g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Andre Onana image 24

Andre Onana Cameroon flag

2023-24 Performances


View full 2023-24 profile

5.6 Season Average Rating
Appearances
49
Clean sheets
12
Goals
0
Assists
0
Yellow cards
6

Chip

Full Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2010
Messages
2,722
He was louded as one of the best GK with his feet before he came here, but suddenly he is only decent for some of our fans. Ok. :lol:
The United effect, eh? Not the first time a player's level suddenly drops extremely after joining us.
 

Dansk

Full Member
Joined
May 7, 2017
Messages
1,398
He's obviously not a shit keeper. His start here hasn't been the best, but people are going way overboard about a select few incidents. If he was genuinely not good, he wouldn't be widely regarded as one of the better keepers in the world, with the likes of Oliver Kahn and Manuel Neuer rating him as their favourite.

We've gone from a keeper who was only a shot-stopper and nothing else whatsoever, to a keeper who's good at all the "else" stuff while shot-stopping isn't quite his forté. It's like breaking up with a girl who was a drug addict, domestic abuser and sociopath but also a great cook, and finding a new girl who's lovely in every way except her cooking is a little bit below par, and then regretting it because you miss the last girl's cooking. It's irrational.

A year ago, we were pulling our hair out because we had a keeper who could do nothing but save shots. Now we have one who can do those things we missed. If he had also been the perfect shot-stopper on top of that, he'd have been the best keeper in the world and cost £100m and would have had offers from every club in the world, so there's no chance we would have got him.

Onana is realistically the best keeper we could have got to replace DDG. There were no better options available, and he'll do fine once the team as a whole is not in disarray. Keep in mind he's also playing behind a replacement defense because all the first choices are injured, and his main strength - distribution - is hindered by the fact that we're utterly impotent up front. Once that's sorted, he'll do well. The current state of the team is making his job very hard.
 
Last edited:

poleglass red

Full Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2015
Messages
3,716
I'm not a huge fan, but I wouldn't be writing him off just yet. He's had an unsettled back line, a non exisitent midfield and we've just recently started playing with an actual centre forward. We know he's very good with the ball at his feet, everything else he's not bad, just isn't great. He had some issues settling in, many players do when they come to the PL, with it being us of course they get highlighted. His real plus ie distribution was kind of negated in previous ganmes as he had no outlets, especially when Rashford was playing centrally. We are starting to get players back, let's see how he gets on then before we write him off.
 

Okey

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
2,437
I like how he's comfortable with the ball, but watching him spend 20-30 seconds on the ball every time he is on the ball is infuriating, especially when we're chasing a goal.
If there obvious passes he's ignoring, I would be infuriated too. But there's usually no one showing up well enough for the pass. Teams that want to play out from the back aren't usually as static as we tend to be. The lack of movement makes you wonder if we're truly training to play out from the back.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,264
Again, trotting out this line.

Nobody claimed he would transform the attack or that a goalkeeper would increase the finishing of chances.

People, myself included said that a goalkeeper of his quality, would help with the build up phase and the recycling of possession, enabling the team to build sustained periods of pressure and defend higher. Which in turn should lead to more goal scoring opportunities created. Utd actually have the most high turnovers in the league, but the fewest of these turned into goals. It's precisely the reason why you bring in a player of his skillset.

It's the idiots who are writing a player off after 5 or 6 games that really need to have a word with themselves.
OMFG

Go through the De Gea Performance thread, circa June/July 2023, for yourself. It was one pisstake after another how De Gea destroyed our attacks and how Onana, being a proper modern keeper, would "transform" our attack.

It was never just about helping with the buildup phase and the recycling of possession, but since this is now what we're shifting to as the reason for bringing in Onana, we are undeniably worse in our buildup play and recycling of possession. I will not blame Onana for the deterioration of our buildup and possession, but no sane person will argue that United have improved their buildup and possession play since the arrival of Onana.

At least not so far. And that's the point, the point being that our previous keeper was what was holding back our buildup and possession play. De Gea's howlers were reason enough to let him go, but apart from being at least a wash in terms of shot-stopping, the entire rationale for Onana was that he would improve our performance overall with superior buildup play and recycling of possession. That has only not happened, we are undeniably worse at both than we were last season, although I want to be clear that Onana shoulders none of the blame for that. The point is that it was hilariously, and pathetically, claimed here that if we just got rid of De Gea -- and getting rid of De Gea was how it was often described here -- that we would dramatically improve our buildup play and recycling of possession, and thus our attack. Even the lovechild of Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder can see that that has not happened.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
I like him. I think expectations were unrealistic. Thought we all knew this transfer meant sacrificing saves for ball ability. Another thing that's not necessarily specific to this case is w reeally gotta stop thinking we're one bad position away from unlocking excellence in other sides of the pitch. The others still need to actually know how to keep the friggin ball for such a sacrifice to be worth it. Maguire was also supposed to be the ball playing CB to change everything, Varane was going to unlock Maguire, Sancho was going to unlock our right side. The adjacent position isn't why all our favs are limited. Time to get real.
 
Last edited:

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
44,426
Fortunately for him, he isn't the main or only source of our problems, and is still adjusting to a new league so can be given some leeway. But let's not pretend that we wouldn't be taking the piss if he was playing for one of our rivals.
 

FerociousCorgis

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2017
Messages
4,437
If there obvious passes he's ignoring, I would be infuriated too. But there's usually no one showing up well enough for the pass. Teams that want to play out from the back aren't usually as static as we tend to be. The lack of movement makes you wonder if we're truly training to play out from the back.
it was pretty much the same under ddg too. So much static in front of him that just forces gk to go long. Hell if anything i feel like we have been moving even less in front of onana than we were for ddg. Idk but it boggles my mind right now with what im seeing. Just have no idea how that could be want EtH wants them to do.
 

Superunknown

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
8,429
I quite like him, tbh. He's definitely got skill with the ball. Shot stopping needs to be better, but the defence and midfield also need to work harder to minimise the amount of shots he has to face. I feel that he has been spending too much time waiting for the right pass to make because there just isn't enough movement in front of him, which has been a problem of ours for such a long time. When he does kick it long, it usually rebounds off Rashford and we lose the ball. If we're going to be using this kind of goalkeeper, we need to be offering so much more in front of him. He's not suddenly a failure and not good enough at Man United. The problem is that we're not good enough all over the pitch and aren't functioning as a unified, well drilled team. Part of that is down to the chopping and changing because of injuries, which has made it hard to implement an idea because the parts keep changing within that machine.

To write him off after such a short amount of time is folly.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,388
OMFG

Go through the De Gea Performance thread, circa June/July 2023, for yourself. It was one pisstake after another how De Gea destroyed our attacks and how Onana, being a proper modern keeper, would "transform" our attack.

It was never just about helping with the buildup phase and the recycling of possession, but since this is now what we're shifting to as the reason for bringing in Onana, we are undeniably worse in our buildup play and recycling of possession. I will not blame Onana for the deterioration of our buildup and possession, but no sane person will argue that United have improved their buildup and possession play since the arrival of Onana.

At least not so far. And that's the point, the point being that our previous keeper was what was holding back our buildup and possession play. De Gea's howlers were reason enough to let him go, but apart from being at least a wash in terms of shot-stopping, the entire rationale for Onana was that he would improve our performance overall with superior buildup play and recycling of possession. That has only not happened, we are undeniably worse at both than we were last season, although I want to be clear that Onana shoulders none of the blame for that. The point is that it was hilariously, and pathetically, claimed here that if we just got rid of De Gea -- and getting rid of De Gea was how it was often described here -- that we would dramatically improve our buildup play and recycling of possession, and thus our attack. Even the lovechild of Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder can see that that has not happened.
I did, could only find these quotes from someone called lex talionis who repeatedly says it, but never actually provides the proof of the posts they keeping claiming said it first.

How much more evidence do we need to explain the substandard play of Sancho, Martial and Antony this season back to the horrifying performances of David De Gea?
But if we get rid of De Gea and bring in Costa instead, great, but we better address the vastly higher needs at striker...unless the argument -- which I've actually read here -- is that De Gea is at fault for our poor finishing on goal, carries the day, which is beyond daft.
 

Herschel Krustofsky

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
796
Location
Manchester
Supports
Balanced perspectives
I like him. I think expectations were unrealistic. Thought we all knew this transfer meant sacrificing saves for ball ability. Another thing that's not necessarily specific to this case is w reeally gotta stop thinking we're one bad position away from unlocking excellence in other sides of the pitch. The others still need to actually know how to keep the friggin ball for such a sacrifice to be worth it. Maguire was also supposed to be the ball playing CB to change everything, Varane was going to unlock Maguire, Sancho was going to unlock our right side. The adjacent position isn't why all our favs are limited. Time to get real.
This is what’s been depressing me of late, Bruno & McSauce were particularly terrible for this against Bayern.

Bruno going for Hollywood balls and instantly inviting Bayern onto us, McSauce possibly just seeing things that others don’t.
 
Man Utd 3:0 Crystal Palace

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,098
An amazing stat I just looked up to demonstrate how much more we’re using the keeper in possession. PL official stats.

Season before ETH arrived DDG made 788 passes in his 38 league appearances.

Onana has played 6 games and is already on 213.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,582
Lovely saves, doing whatever to keep the ball out.
The save in the second half when he stopped it with his foot was nice especially as it's an awkward place where you are tempted to go with your hands sometimes
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,264
Solid saves v Palace. It would be ludicrous to argue that Onana’s footwork had anything to do with our improved buildup play and possession recycling, as such indicators have a lot more to do with quality midfield play — Casemiro and Amrabat — but when you win 3-0 and the keeper makes a couple of fine saves it’s entirely appropriate to acknowledge that the keeper did his job. Quietly, but effectively…which is how it should be.
 

stw2022

New Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2021
Messages
3,687
It's funny to watch now often opposition players backing off the press once it's played back to him. Noticed it a couple of times last night
 

Marcelinho87

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2010
Messages
7,265
Location
Barnsley
Solid saves v Palace. It would be ludicrous to argue that Onana’s footwork had anything to do with our improved buildup play and possession recycling, as such indicators have a lot more to do with quality midfield play — Casemiro and Amrabat — but when you win 3-0 and the keeper makes a couple of fine saves it’s entirely appropriate to acknowledge that the keeper did his job. Quietly, but effectively…which is how it should be.
You will see Amrabat drop for the ball from him a few times throughout, with the right players and system Onana will be key in our first phase of play.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,290
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
An amazing stat I just looked up to demonstrate how much more we’re using the keeper in possession. PL official stats.

Season before ETH arrived DDG made 788 passes in his 38 league appearances.

Onana has played 6 games and is already on 213.
That’s amazing. Would put him on target for 1349 over the season. Almost twice as many as DDG. Which is two fingers to the “BuT YoU sAiD He’D cHanGe ThE waY we PlAy!!!” crowd. News flash. He has.

I’d still like to his passing be a little more incisive. Although I guess he’s avoiding any risky passes after having a disappointing start to his United career. The last thing he needs now is to concede a goal due to a misplaced pass. So it’s understandable he’s playing it safe. Hopefully the best is yet to come
 

TrustInJanuzaj

'Liverpool are a proper club'
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
10,788
Solid saves v Palace. It would be ludicrous to argue that Onana’s footwork had anything to do with our improved buildup play and possession recycling, as such indicators have a lot more to do with quality midfield play — Casemiro and Amrabat — but when you win 3-0 and the keeper makes a couple of fine saves it’s entirely appropriate to acknowledge that the keeper did his job. Quietly, but effectively…which is how it should be.
Your agenda is painfully transparent.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,388
Your agenda is painfully transparent.
That poster has created an imaginary argument about the keeper being responsible for attacking players scoring more goals. But, still refuses to acknowledge how having a keeper who is good on the ball will benefit the team as whole in terms of building up play in the first phase and recycling possession.

Onana had a good game last night, Palace were poor enough, but he did his job well, they have nothing to complain about today.
 

OmarUnited4ever

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,459
That’s amazing. Would put him on target for 1349 over the season. Almost twice as many as DDG. Which is two fingers to the “BuT YoU sAiD He’D cHanGe ThE waY we PlAy!!!” crowd. News flash. He has.

I’d still like to his passing be a little more incisive. Although I guess he’s avoiding any risky passes after having a disappointing start to his United career. The last thing he needs now is to concede a goal due to a misplaced pass. So it’s understandable he’s playing it safe. Hopefully the best is yet to come
I think one thing that is bit obvious is that at times, oppo players avoid pressing him, which means they can go man to man and make it difficult for Onana to pick a free player in the middle or final third unless someone makes a run on the flank.

It is also obvious our players' movements aren't well coordinated yet to pull oppo players apart, so not easy for Onana to find someone in an open pocket of space.

but still, teams now worry about pressing us gung-ho as they risk an over the top simple pass that can expose the vacant spaces they leave behind which in turn makes our build up from the back a lot easier.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,290
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I think one thing that is bit obvious is that at times, oppo players avoid pressing him, which means they can go man to man and make it difficult for Onana to pick a free player in the middle or final third unless someone makes a run on the flank.

It is also obvious our players' movements aren't well coordinated yet to pull oppo players apart, so not easy for Onana to find someone in an open pocket of space.

but still, teams now worry about pressing us gung-ho as they risk an over the top simple pass that can expose the vacant spaces they leave behind which in turn makes our build up from the back a lot easier.
Yup. The first and most obvious difference is how much time he has on the ball compared to DDG. Being able to build up from the back without being under any pressure is a big advantage right out the gate.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,098
That’s amazing. Would put him on target for 1349 over the season. Almost twice as many as DDG. Which is two fingers to the “BuT YoU sAiD He’D cHanGe ThE waY we PlAy!!!” crowd. News flash. He has.

I’d still like to his passing be a little more incisive. Although I guess he’s avoiding any risky passes after having a disappointing start to his United career. The last thing he needs now is to concede a goal due to a misplaced pass. So it’s understandable he’s playing it safe. Hopefully the best is yet to come
It’s just a godsend to have that extra time, one of the reasons the best teams look like they play with so much intensity is their keepers will routinely do what Onana does through a game to give the outfield players time to recover. Then when the ball is back in play they are running about like mad men again.

Incidentally that’s where I’d say City are weakest when they play Haaland in my opinion, if Haaland and Doku start those are both players who are physically not able to press with the same intensity as other players for a long period - the trade off is the explosive threat they both carry which is very hard to stop when they have the ball but it will be interesting when we play them if we try to keep the ball and make them work hard to get it back vs previous years where we’d go long, they’d then patiently build and we’d be chasing the ball for way too long.
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,962
Supports
A Free Palestine
He's class - I knew he'd be a transformative signing for us.
 

dinostar77

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
7,316
He's class - I knew he'd be a transformative signing for us.
Potential to be, but not yet. Utd defensive line should be much higher for him to have the transformative effect people speak about.

Maybe it will take time for our defenders to get out of a low block mentally. We've had that since mourinho onwards.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,955
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
It's funny to watch now often opposition players backing off the press once it's played back to him. Noticed it a couple of times last night
Teams don't press us anymore and there's no panic at the back now, we're much more assured with him in goal and it's a massive improvement on the hand grenade football we played when De Gea was here.
 

Lyng

Full Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
5,225
Location
Denmark
Great saves and his usual composed passing. His impact is clear for all to see as teams just dont press us in the same way anymore.
 

Superunknown

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
8,429
Today was one of those games where I expected we would be using him in the sweeper role, pinging the ball out wide, coming out of his box to start attacks. We're seeing less and less of that side of his game already, which is the one thing I was looking forward to with him. Hmm.
 

Ted Lasso

Full Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Messages
1,930
Today was one of those games where I expected we would be using him in the sweeper role, pinging the ball out wide, coming out of his box to start attacks. We're seeing less and less of that side of his game already, which is the one thing I was looking forward to with him. Hmm.
Was thinking exactly the same. 80% possession and he's just a few yards outside of our box nowhere near play. You see keepers with a fraction of his ability involved across the league. I don't understand it
 

FerociousCorgis

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2017
Messages
4,437
I get people don't press us anymore, but still nothing really comes of having onana back there with the ball. He doesn't come out that much sweeping, and the passing is essentially like having maguire there passing. We need to start moving the fecking ball quicker and get back to pass and move
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,300
Goldridge just said he should have saved it.....no DDG agenda....