Genuinely confused as to how you watched the game vs Spurs and came out thinking "y'know, this game proves we should replace Onana". Was this the game that made you realise that he isn't going to transform our attack?
You’re confused because your attempt at a strawman argument exposes you, not me. I never wrote that Zonana’s performance v Spurs proved or disproved anything.
By everyone’s account, even those of his diehard supporters, Onana has not performed anywhere near what was expected. Starting with preseason he looked a shambles but it was early days. He has struggled all season, particularly in the CL, and he was struggling before the Spurs match, when his performance was on par with his performances most of the season so far.
I actually defended Onana here from the accusation that the Richarlison goal was all Onana’s. My accusation here is that Onana should have done better on the Betancur goal. Beyond that, I have been in arguing that if given another season to settle into the demands of playing for United and if given better coaching that Onana could become a decent keeper.
As for the transformation argument, you really don’t want to open that can of worms. Suffice it to say that the notion that Onana could have ever transformed our attack was mind bogglingly moronic in the first place.
Quite the opposite of what you claim I claimed.