You could clearly see he was under instruction to play it tidy, provide cover, & keep possession. He did a good job of that for the most part, and helped create chances in open play as Watford opened up the game. Could have done better with a couple opportunities, but compared to Rashford/Lingard he's far more productive considering he's not playing consistently.
Stop rating him based on flashy dribbles, how much he runs (lol) etc. It's his tactical discipline/decision making that Mourinho criticizes & today i think he showed good discipline. Could he have ran more in the end maybe? But not critical when you are up a goal with the game almost over. Did you see McTominay running up to support that counter, no...
Get a grip people. Should Jose play him over Rashford/Lingard YES. But unless we have a new manager who can actually set up a balanced team that puts our attacking players in good positions, all our attackers (except those who can finish crosses) will end up looking mediocre. Do you think fans of the other top clubs criticize their top young talents for tracking back??? FFS, this has been the reality and will be with our attacking football until we get a new manager.
Very well said. I don't think anyone would back Martial's defensive game at all - however ultimately our emphasis on defence is actually part of our attack - we allow the pressure on our back line so we hit the team on the counter; ultimately this is why Sanchez, Rashford & Lukaku might be at RB in the 89th minute. Add to that - we lose the ball and can't retain a control of possession meaning a lot of our defensive work happens reactively on the spot which leaves players out of both their attacking & defensive positions - playing like bulldozers - playing like players who give a ****.
Martial is not suited to either the attacking nor defensive side of Jose's tactics whilst someone like Rashford is more suited to the defensive side than actually being all that important in the attacking side of our football.
The amount of time we actually allow the opposition to have the ball in comparison to a team like City is absolutely insane - we let the opposition control matches & Martial is rightfully or wrongfully called Lazy.
Whilst I have seen enough of him to not completely rule out him being lazy in his defensive game - I have also seen enough footballers who are not defensive bulldozers all across the pitch.
Ultimately there's a difference between a team of 11 players that keep 60-70% possession, fighting for that tiny occasion when the opponent has the ball as attackers in their position; vs - a whole team who give up 50-55% possession in terms of game fluidity and have to spend that time dropping back, defending deep, defending in not their original attacking or defensive positions ultimately to also hit that club on the counter.
Whilst Guardiola might rightfully never back Martial due to him being Lazy - the fact is that the team will dominate that game to the point that there players are not bulldozing defensively by the corner flag ever 5 minutes - they maintain possession & defend as soon as they lose predominantly with high pressure with their face still towards the opposition goal - not having to run back towards ours.
Martial will be better defensively for a team that attack better & attack more consistently. They are linked even though he will never be ji sung parks one lung.