Antoine Griezmann| Signs a new contract till 2022

Will we sign Griezmann this summer ?


  • Total voters
    700
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Womp

idiot
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
9,269
Location
Australia
We are not not interested in him, the ban made the deal very unlikely.
Which raises the question as to fecking why? Auba is supposedly off for 60 or so million, I'm sure we could have afforded both him and Griezmann instead of blowing our load on inferior strikers. Auba is superior to both Belotti and Morata.
 

Ødegaard

formerly MrEriksen
Scout
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
11,474
Location
Norway
United have known about Zlatans injury for quite some time. If that changes things this much so suddenly, they need to find something else to do.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,344
Location
Manchester
I'm calling bullshit on that. Ducker knows nothing, his third tweet even leaves room for getting out of it with basically saying but it could still happen.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,533
:lol: are we giving up because of James Duckweed?

Amazing autocorrect ^^
No, like 5 journo's tweeted the same thing within 5 minutes, it's obviously a club briefing. Also Di Marzio said our interest had cooled last week too.
 

Djemba-Djemba

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
21,563
Location
Manchester
It's disappointing if true.

I still have hope it'll happen but it looks like if it does it'll be another long drawn out tiresome saga.

Wonder who we're now after then. I'd be underwhelmed if it was Lukaku to be honest.
 

WPMUFC

Full Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
9,733
Location
Australia
I'm calling bullshit on that. Ducker knows nothing, his third tweet even leaves room for getting out of it with basically saying but it could still happen.
Ducker, BBC and MEN all within minutes of each other, saying the same thing? It's a briefing.
 

Summit

"do the dead, spread your seed and get out"
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
51,054
I'm calling bullshit on that. Ducker knows nothing, his third tweet even leaves room for getting out of it with basically saying but it could still happen.
It isn't just Ducker mate. Too many for it not to be a club brief.
 

settembrini

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
3,283
We need both though. We can work multiple deals at one time
We don't tbh. If we go into next season with Mkhitaryan/Mata as our #10s OR play a midfield three of Pogba/Herrera/new DM I think we would be fine.

However going into next season without a new #9 would be a massive gamble.

Griezmann is a brilliant player and I'd love to see him in our team but he's closer to a luxury signing than an important one.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
We must have been given the green light for a no 9.
We're not turning Antoine down without oir main no 9 target agreeing to a move
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,414
Location
Lucilinburhuc
Which raises the question as to fecking why? Auba is supposedly off for 60 or so million, I'm sure we could have afforded both him and Griezmann instead of blowing our load on inferior strikers. Auba is superior to both Belotti and Morata.
Atletico dont want to sell due to not getting any players in this summer, that means we have to pay his buyout up front. I doubt the club would do that. And maybe Mou was just not keen on Auba for whatever the reason.
 

Summit

"do the dead, spread your seed and get out"
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
51,054
Never wanted him anyway. Would have never carried that 7 at United.
 

Morpheus 7

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
3,714
Location
Ireland
The English media are rubbish on transfers for us now, they are probably reading what Di marzio said and seen the ban being upheld. Athletico and Griezmann have knew that ban was going to be upheld weeks ago. He would have not said on tv that his future would be decided in two weeks, if things couldn't be concluded either way. I still think he'll come, it's early yet to write this off. I think we will buy a number 9 and 10, it's hardly going to be done by the 1st of June. It's going to be a long window, thing's drag. They usually do with us.
 

iamherenow

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
144
I WANT MBAPPE,HE IS THE ONLY ONE THAT WILL SATISFY MY MUPPETRY AFTER GRIEZMANN..get it done woody..i want that boy
 

Dracula

caf plane air-master
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
3,991
Makes perfect sense. If need a striker then depending on who we get and how much they are will dictate whether we would be willing to meet greizmanns release clause.
 

FCBarca

Mes que un Rag
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
14,246
Location
La Côte, Suisse
Supports
Peace
So the Ibra Injury that happened months ago has made United change their mind only now, the day Atleti's ban is upheld? Sounds like a bit of saving face tbh, don't think this one will happen.

Onto the Lukaku thread.
Agree although it's a bit silly in the end as the whole internet knows about the CAS verdict impacting Atletico - only logical that United were going to have to course correct as a result

Chelsea vs United for Lukaku then
 

Ole90+3

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
5,957
Location
Paddy's Pub with the gang
I don't think Griezman's the kind of guy to play second fiddle in terms of deals, it gets done soon or it won't get done he isn't gonna sit tight all summer hoping a bid comes in.

He will commit to Athletico in the coming days if United's lack of interest is true. We've completely fecked this up.
Why does he need to do anything? It's Atletico's fault for not playing ball with United in regards to negotiating. If he doesn't sign a contract, then there's a better chance that Madrid will sell this window or next. Griezmann is still young, and we're still going to be very interested in his services even if the transfer doesn't happen in this window.
 

MuFc_1992

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
1,212
Why would it be a negotiating tactic when he has a release clause in his contract. We were never getting him for anything less than that and I don't think our ability to trigger his clause depends on Athletico's transfer ban. Am I missing something here?
 

Mister_Stubbs

New Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
9,634
Location
6th
If we are about to sign Robert Lewandowski then fair enough but we aren't. Gobsmacked that the club feels the need to pass up on one of the genuine world class players in world football right now.
 

senorgregster

Last Newbie Standing
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
10,343
Location
Anywhere but Liverpool
No, like 5 journo's tweeted the same thing within 5 minutes, it's obviously a club briefing. Also Di Marzio said our interest had cooled last week too.
Why would a club brief the press on a matter like this? What is there to gain? If anything it hurts us because we'd lose leverage over clubs with players we want.
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,414
Location
Lucilinburhuc
We don't tbh. If we go into next season with Mkhitaryan/Mata as our #10s OR play a midfield three of Pogba/Herrera/new DM I think we would be fine.

However going into next season without a new #9 would be a massive gamble.

Griezmann is a brilliant player and I'd love to see him in our team but he's closer to a luxury signing than an important one.
of course we need both, he wouldnt be our priority if that was the case. Ibras injury didnt happen yesterday. We needed a striker anyway after his injury, but also Griezmann, who was a target before and after his injury.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,146
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Makes sense that we've cooled interest. We desperately need to bolster that number 9 position. Greizmann will happen, it just might not be anytime soon.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,664
Location
Salford
I want Mbappe, but he's so Real Madrid bound that he may as well have their badge tattooed on his face
 

Reynoldo

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2006
Messages
4,970
Location
Dublin
It's not exactly turning our noses up. The transfer ban for Atletico means that we are forced to pay the €100m in one lump sum rather than instalments. This changes things and it makes sense that our priorities have changes. It's a smart move from the club. Get the players we need first and foremost, and if there is scope there to purchase Griezmann then I've no doubt we will, even if he doesn't come until January/next summer.
Unless someone buys him in the meantime for the lump, cue meltdown on here if he signs for PSG or the like
 

villain

Hates Beyoncé
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
14,974
United have known about Zlatans injury for quite some time. If that changes things this much so suddenly, they need to find something else to do.
Think it has more to do with Ibra's future. He's probably signaled an intention to leave rather than staying. Therefore we need to prioritise a replacement for him.
 

Woodzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
14,830
Location
Cardiff
This one just had to turn into a saga didn't it...

Just knew it was going to be the dead cert it has seemed for months.

Acquire Me remaining confident still gives me hope though.
 

vk20legend

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
823
Location
The Village.
I still think we'll get him. Maybe we want to get a striker in first and then go for him.

I don't want us to get Mbappe as I'm sure in about two or three years into the contract he'll start "dreaming" about Madrid and we'll just be forced to sell him after developing him and see his best years at Madrid. Feck that. I would rather take my chances with Rashford than this scenario.

I would rather extend Ibra for a season, get AG and a CM and CB and maybe get Chicharito if Rooney leaves and go for a striker next season.
 

ilovethisgameahahah

New Member
Joined
May 5, 2017
Messages
596
Why would it be a negotiating tactic when he has a release clause in his contract. We were never getting him for anything less than that and I don't think our ability to trigger his clause depends on Athletico's transfer ban. Am I missing something here?
Because Atleti might be asking for the money in a lump sum to try and put us off. Normally transfer fees are paid over years,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.