Pat_Mustard
I'm so gorgeous they want to put me under arrest!
You've had to sell off half your team thoughSpeak for yourself I’m sitting on a cool 20m
You've had to sell off half your team thoughSpeak for yourself I’m sitting on a cool 20m
Do we still need to have 12 players in the reinforcement rounds? Would be easier to sell the sub to generate moneyFeel free to sell players if you want money for reinforcements.
I m assuming min prices won’t change in reinforcements at all.Feel free to sell players if you want money for reinforcements.
TRANSFER LIST
Billy Bremner- 30m
Harry Kane- 30m
Paul Janes- 30m
Yaya Toure- 30m
I have 20m, and that 50m list has a few gems left
Wind your neck in FFSI hope any rule changes from here on take a consensus before.
Already been a shabbily run draft.
Dont mind me mate. Keep the rebuilding going. Looks funWind your neck in FFS
Yea, saw that and decided to give in and make my last pick.I've emptied my pocket, all in Cannavaro's bid.
Sorry bro.
I think a bonus (insert sum) should be given to those who get through and we should be allowed to sell players at base price back to bank.Even if you manage to save 20-30m , you can't really significantly reinforce your team. And it all seems a bit pointless, why save your money when you might not even make it through to the next round, you are better off investing all resources now there's no reason to wait. Hopefully Edgar rethinks the reinforcement rules.
Nope.I m assuming min prices won’t change in reinforcements at all.
Reinforcements does not necessarily mean getting another GOAT. You just upgrade your weakest players and you don't need another $100m to do that.Even if you manage to save 20-30m , you can't really significantly reinforce your team. And it all seems a bit pointless, why save your money when you might not even make it through to the next round, you are better off investing all resources now there's no reason to wait. Hopefully Edgar rethinks the reinforcement rules.
Already been a shabbily run draft.
Can we sell players purchased for 20m for 10m right now?The intention was to limit the bidding on usual suspects, and move the active bids to lesser known players....but didn't work. I was expecting more trading on likes of Haan, Koeman, Lerby who are absolute steals now. You all still blew your loads on few and are scraping the barrel down the line.
Anyways, if any of you are having thoughts on getting a >100m players in reinforcements, you can forget it...unless you have saved or willing to trade for it.
aye, agree with that. The bonus shouldn't be a great sum to get you GOAT's but something that you can improve 2 positions for example and keep the squad size at a minimum 12 should do the trick.I think a bonus (insert sum) should be given to those who get through and we should be allowed to sell players at base price back to bank.
No one wants to see stagnant teams all the way through to the final.
Nope.
Reinforcements does not necessarily mean getting another GOAT. You just upgrade your weakest players and you don't need another $100m to do that.
I also agree with Pillow that trying to get 100m players for RI should be very difficult. So something which strikes a balance should be sought.aye, agree with that. The bonus shouldn't be a great sum to get you GOAT's but something that you can improve 2 positions for example and keep the squad size at a minimum 12 should do the trick.
Avoiding the usual super-teams at the end of an all-time draft will be a nice change of pace tbh. I think this has worked out fairly well, and given that the drafting is likely to be done and dusted in under a week it's not like we've invested much time in it anyway. If the later rounds turn out dull due to lack of reinforcements then just chalk it up as an experiment.The intention was to limit the bidding on usual suspects, and move the active bids to lesser known players....but didn't work. I was expecting more trading on likes of Haan, Koeman, Lerby who are absolute steals now. You all still blew your loads on few and are scraping the barrel down the line.
Anyways, if any of you are having thoughts on getting a >100m players in reinforcements, you can forget it...unless you have saved or willing to trade for it.
YesCan we sell players purchased for 20m for 10m right now?
It's upgrading, not buying. Batistuta plus 40m extra would have gotten you Bobby Charlton or Dalglish plus 40m would have given you Masopust or Law or Stoichkov. The tiers are placed that way so you don't need a big money jump to upgrade players. Sell them and add in a little cash and you just jumped a tier.20-30 get's you nothing in this market, that's why saving money is pointless. If you are stingy with players now and save 100m you are very unlikely to make it through to the next round. It's just all pointless.
How is losing batistuta and getting charlton an upgrade to the squad? Its not batistuta that needs to be upgraded. Sorry for using logic.It's upgrading, not buying. Batistuta plus 40m extra would have gotten you Bobby Charlton or Dalglish plus 40m would have given you Masopust or Law or Stoichkov. The tiers are placed that way so you don't need a big money jump to upgrade players. Sell them and add in a little cash and you just jumped a tier.
The problem in normal reinforcements is that you can get rid of Zambrotta and jump all the way to Cafu in one swoop. It is in theory possible here too, but what's more likely is step by step upgrades by moving up tiers.
I'll consider Bank buying back at base prize but won't commit to it now.
If this rule is bought in too, someone can takeover my squad. No point in explaining to deaf ears why it favors some and is bad for othersI'll consider Bank buying back at base prize but won't commit to it now.
But why wouldn't you just buy Charlton or Masopust in the first place?It's upgrading, not buying. Batistuta plus 40m extra would have gotten you Bobby Charlton or Dalglish plus 40m would have given you Masopust or Law or Stoichkov. The tiers are placed that way so you don't need a big money jump to upgrade players. Sell them and add in a little cash and you just jumped a tier.
The problem in normal reinforcements is that you can get rid of Zambrotta and jump all the way to Cafu in one swoop. It is in theory possible here too, but what's more likely is step by step upgrades by moving up tiers.
I'll consider Bank buying back at base prize but won't commit to it now.
Not just those two players literally, but a 30m striker can be upgraded to a 50m one and so on.But why wouldn't you just buy Charlton or Masopust in the first place?
It also doesn't make sense to sell your best players just to make sideways moves.
How?Not just those two players literally, but a 30m striker can be upgraded to a 50m one and so on.
I'd say your theory works well for R1, where you can sell the sub to generate extra cash but post the first RR, you're really struggling to meaningfully improve your side and it goes backwards if anything.Not just those two players literally, but a 30m striker can be upgraded to a 50m one and so on.
Perhaps the fact that it's just you having problems whilst 15 other managers playing are fine with the way this draft is being run, says something?If this rule is bought in too, someone can takeover my squad. No point in explaining to deaf ears why it favors some and is bad for others