Eboue
nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
Agreedhaha he's short and has a weird voice hahaha isn't that funny? glad a kid got bullied, what a loser
Agreedhaha he's short and has a weird voice hahaha isn't that funny? glad a kid got bullied, what a loser
It wasn't a joke. You posted it because you got too emotionally invested and shitposted and are now walking it back because people called you out on it.
even if you are somehow right if I took it back then that's the end of that.It wasn't a joke. You posted it because you got too emotionally invested and shitposted and are now walking it back because people called you out on it.
Wow so edgy and subtle...Sudden influx of social justice warriors in here virtue signalling their disgust at people finding Ben being bullied funny.
Get off my turf, you daytrippers.
Somehow? You know I'm right, foo.even if you are somehow right if I took it back then that's the end of that.
Even by you're definition I wasn't serious but annoyed at the bernie brigade
Soyboy ****.Squishy is blatantly short with a funny voice too. And no sense of humour either judging by his reply to this.
No, I mean it. There's a load of you who suddenly care about feelings when it's Ben who's being bullied.Wow so edgy and subtle...
Outrage culture I tellz yaNo, I mean it. There's a load of you who suddenly care about feelings when it's Ben who's being bullied.
Seems I should have used some more words, because you obviously didn't understand what I've said.You've used a lot of words to basically say 'the centre also commit violence, so you can't say the far left also do it'. A lot of words for a lot of whataboutism.
What I wrote:You (...) basically say 'the centre also commit violence, so you can't say the far left also do it'.
Looks like you kind of went on autopilot there.By which I don't want to curb any reasonable discussion about regressive tendencies in the real-existing left, btw. They sure as hell exist.
From the standpoint of a general criticism of violence and bigotry - not the same as pacifism -, culprits from the left can be criticized as much as anyone else. But that approach also pulls the rug under anti-communism and anti-"extremism", as it hits the societal order they're designed to promote in the same way.Which hysterics? The far left have a long, violent history of repressing people who clash with the way they want to mould society. And we've seen in this thread in the last two pages how people are happy to justify bullying or general cnuty behaviour as long as it happens to certain people.
And the only reason the 'western far left' has a lot of catching up to do is because the Western far left never gained any genuine kind of power, because we witnessed examples of what they're capable of in Asia/Eastern Europe.
I didn't say that far left extremists invented those tactics or that they were the only ones who practised it, merely that they do so, and often hypocritically hide behind their ideology as an excuse to be nasty.Seems I should have used some more words, because you obviously didn't understand what I've said.
What you read:
What I wrote:
Looks like you kind of went on autopilot there.
--------
From the standpoint of a general criticism of violence and bigotry - not the same as pacifism -, culprits from the left can be criticized as much as anyone else. But that approach also pulls the rug under anti-communism and anti-"extremism", as it hits the societal order they're designed to promote in the same way.
This thread is a bit of a mess, btw.
"Permanently marked". Okay.Somehow? You know I'm right, foo.
Even though you took it back, I'm afraid you're permanently marked by that statement. At least it's not a tagline.
So can you point out a time I didnt care for anyone else being bullied?No, I mean it. There's a load of you who suddenly care about feelings when it's Ben who's being bullied.
Your vote for Trump comment is still being invoked to this day, yes? *adds another tally*"Permanently marked". Okay.
Depends on who invokes it. Context matters.Your vote for Trump comment is still being invoked to this day, yes? *adds another tally*
That doesn’t matter. It’s the fact that posters invoke it to begin with. Happens to a lot of posters. Look at Raoul. We’re still giving him shit about his comment of Trump pivoting to the left, and he said that in 2016/17.Depends on who invokes it. Context matters.
Feel free. I wasn't quoting "permanently marked" in an attempt to question it, just how childish it sounded. Then again you're here with the pro bullying stance so I'm not sure I should be surprised... after all, it's not like you have actual solid arguments to defend that.That doesn’t matter. It’s the fact that posters invoke it to begin with. Happens to a lot of posters. Look at Raoul. We’re still giving him shit about his comment of Trump pivoting to the left, and he said that in 2016/17.
As if you don’t half come up with some childish shit on your own, especially when the comment in question is pretty damn childish.Feel free. I wasn't quoting "permanently marked" in an attempt to question it, just how childish it sounded. Then again you're here with the pro bullying stance so I'm not sure I should be surprised...
There’s a recent gem in the 2020 thread, apparently he found enough empathy for little Benny but when it came to people in need of free healthcare, ‘this is America’.No but if I am to take this as an open invitation to point out when I feel you're lacking the empathy that you found in this thread, then that sounds fun.
We are still giving him shit for ‘racism is largely blunted in the States’, that must be like 2012 or soThat doesn’t matter. It’s the fact that posters invoke it to begin with. Happens to a lot of posters. Look at Raoul. We’re still giving him shit about his comment of Trump pivoting to the left, and he said that in 2016/17.
Imagine taking Eboue’s comments so much to heart that you descend into a sociological critique of certain political spectrums just to make yourself look like some paragon of virtue.
Eboue is a genius fisherman.Imagine taking Eboue’s comments so much to heart that you descend into a sociological critique of certain political spectrums just to make yourself look like some paragon of virtue.
That sounds like a fun term that would wind up a lot of people who deserve winding up. I'll make a note of it.The far-centre
"Extremism" logically implies a genuinely non-"extreme" counterpart. Which has never existed from the angle of any serious criticism of organized violence and social cruelty. It is therefore a self-excuse of the self-styled "center" by design, and that has always been its primary function. Ideologically, it's the continuation of Cold War anti-communism, whose interest-driven selective morality is well documented.I didn't say that far left extremists invented those tactics or that they were the only ones who practised it, merely that they do so, and often hypocritically hide behind their ideology as an excuse to be nasty.
People are wary of extremism and communism for good reason. That doesn't mean the existing order doesn't have blood on its hands, but generally whenever a society makes a huge shift one side or the other, a huge amount of bloodshed goes with it. So it's pretty understandable that 'extremist' might be considered a bit of a dirty word, whether that's rightly or wrongly.
If he didnt want to be bullied he should have thought of that before he was Ben Shapiro.
If there was ever any question of this guy deserves being made fun of for his shortness...Ben's reply to a bot that tweets him every day to remind him he's short
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date