As explained multiple times, I think it’s absolutely fair enough for you to spend your time deploying this odd,
‘yeah but’, take on human rights abuses as long as you’re being consistent with it on literally
every subject - if not, it makes you a hypocrite and renders the points you’re attempting to make appear as petty whataboutisms -
as with the ridiculous cartoon reply you posted of the EU gagging Ozil that
@Synco succinctly dismantled.
That was something you posted in response to the German players making a brilliant gesture on being banned by qatar and fifa from expressing a simple message of solidarity with the LGBT community while playing in a country that has barbaric, evil attitudes toward that community.
Did you disagree with the sentiment of the German players’ gesture?
Do you support qatar and FIFA’s stance? If so, great, we can debate.
If however your point in such an example is simply a petty whataboutism, then you’re gonna be called out on it. I’m sorry if that bothers you or you genuinely can’t understand why it’s viewed as so, but rather than going ‘round in circles, or doubling down like some kind of conversational turd that simply won’t flush away, you’d be better just to accept that there’s nuanced debate, and then there’s pedantic whataboutisms, and the latter is a waste of everyone’s time.