Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,831
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
Some of the delusion comments I've read by some of the leaver's supporters are beyond relief. One actually told me that Brexit will bring the empire back. I am not suggesting that all Leave supporters are as dumb as this person is. However there's high expectations out there and usually that always end up in a massive dissapointment
I have not heard one sensible rational comment from any Brexiter yet, that includes before the vote and since the vote, not one single sensible reply.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,714
They did. Repeatedly, but it was dismissed as scaremongering and Leave had the UK's two biggest newspapers backing them.
I agree. Experts came from all 4 corners of Britain saying that leaving the EU would be madness. Unfortunately they weren't listened to because they don't have funny hair or froggie eyes.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Indeed. News Corp and whatever the Daily Mail's holding company are called make up nearly 60% of newspaper readership in this country with the Express making up I think another 7 or 8%
Murdoch has too tight a grip on this country. There is no way that Leave would have won without him. The Sun in the lead up to the vote was appalling, the first 8 pages were filled with anti immigrant sentiment when I picked it up about a week out.

Now Murdoch is 'delighted' and sees 'opportunities'.

Highly disturbing.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,997
I have not heard one sensible rational comment from any Brexiter yet, that includes before the vote and since the vote, not one single sensible reply.
I don't agree. I don't think @Nick 0208 Ldn is anything like correct but his arguments are not ridiculous. He actually thought it through in a very interesting way even if I'm personally convinced he came to the wrong conclusions.

People like that Stanley guy with their "bloke in the pub said" arguments need to take a short walk off a tall cliff.
 

Crossie

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
4,929
Supports
vibrant attacking football
They did. Repeatedly, but it was dismissed as scaremongering and Leave had the UK's two biggest newspapers backing them.
Indeed. News Corp and whatever the Daily Mail's holding company are called make up nearly 60% of newspaper readership in this country with the Express making up I think another 7 or 8% and I believe every one of their papers was / is pro-Leave? Then you've got Sky News and various other shit sources including the currently awful political reporting of the BBC as well who are constantly more interested in covering the Labour party throwing their toys out of the pram that they have to be socialists again than actually reporting on anything useful such as what appalling bellends the Tory Leave MPs are.

There needs to be a new call for splitting up the press. ******* Harman proposed a bill in 2013 to limit share of readership for one owner to 15%, it was smashed down by all the cowardly MPs who think they can butter up Murdoch to get elected. Well look what happened to Cameron for selling his soul to Murdoch. Career over. Same with Osborne.
I'm not saying remain did not address it. I'm saying they didn't do it clearly enough. I've been listening several hours a day to BBC and Sky News during the last 12 months, and I've been reading a lot of English media outlets as my job requires it anyway. The emphasis of remain as I perceived it was on the economical consequences - without explaining properly why those consequences would occur. The terms of deals Norway or Switzerland have in place was in my view significantly under-addressed.

I fully agree however with your assessment of Sky News and their obsession with the coverage of Labour as well as the decrease of BBC's political coverage, TwoSheds.
 

fcbforever

New Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2013
Messages
4,077
Location
Merkellandia, the land of silent horrors
Supports
FC Bayern München
Broadly speaking, no i did not; moreover, the EU's support of TTIP will damage all three. I also consider Brussels' handing of the migrant crisis as a reason to doubt its competence in that area, which i corroborated by the MSF (an organisation i support).

And i most certainly voted Leave, i'd been waiting fifteen years for such an opportunity.
You do realise British politicians were pushing it and are the most americanophile in the process and leaving the EU will probably mean you will get a much worse deal, also because now you are a bit irrelevant to American trade interest? :confused:
 

SwansonsTache

incontinent sexual deviant & German sausage lover
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
15,563
Location
Norway

M18CTID

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
2,506
Location
Gorton
Supports
Manchester City
They did. Repeatedly, but it was dismissed as scaremongering and Leave had the UK's two biggest newspapers backing them.
Funny how some of the Remain voters are now saying that everything the Leave campaign said was a lie or scaremongering. Sounds like you fell into the same trap of only listening to the likes of Farage - something that you're so quick to criticise a lot of Leave voters for by the way - when if you'd bothered to actually do any research you'd know that there were other facets to the Leave campaign. Here's a link to the Labour Leave campaign website below - perhaps each and every one of you pontificating on here and sneering down your noses at those of us that didn't listen to Farage when arriving at our decision would like to put the time and effort into trying to debunk every point made on the EU facts A-Z list. After all, some of you are hilariously claiming that everything the Leave campaign said is a lie:

http://www.labourleave.org/get-involved/#values
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,456
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
Curious DM article debunking claims house prices will fall, grocery bills will go up etc...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/ne...-taxes-debunk-myths-plan-family-finances.html

This bit is weird- lists good things the EU did, but with the caveat we obviously made them better...

AND WHAT IF YOU'RE SCAMMED BY A SHOP?
Many shoppers may worry that they’ll lose a host of EU consumer safeguards against rip-offs. But the good ones weren’t just hard-wired into UK law - our Government had improved on them to provide even better help for customers sold dud deals.

In 2014, the EU banned sneaky charges and pre-ticked boxes on websites that opt people into buying costly insurance.

The EU Consumer Directive also gave online shoppers 14 days to return goods bought on the web - up from seven days - and extended rights to online music, films and e-books.

Britain updated its Consumer Rights Act to combine several consumer laws, including the Sale of Goods Act, Supply of Goods and Services Act, and the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,997
Funny how some of the Remain voters are now saying that everything the Leave campaign said was a lie or scaremongering. Sounds like you fell into the same trap of only listening to the likes of Farage - something that you're so quick to criticise a lot of Leave voters for by the way - when if you'd bothered to actually do any research you'd know that there were other facets to the Leave campaign. Here's a link to the Labour Leave campaign website below - perhaps each and every one of you pontificating on here and sneering down your noses at those of us that didn't listen to Farage when arriving at our decision would like to put the time and effort into trying to debunk every point made on the EU facts A-Z list. After all, some of you are hilariously claiming that everything the Leave campaign said is a lie:

http://www.labourleave.org/get-involved/#values
Tell you what fella, since you want to feck up my country why don't you tell me which of these claims you believe to be true and I'll tell you whether you're right.

Incidentally, the "Labour Leave" campaign was almost entirely funded by Tory donors.
 

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,831
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
I don't agree. I don't think @Nick 0208 Ldn is anything like correct but his arguments are not ridiculous. He actually thought it through in a very interesting way even if I'm personally convinced he came to the wrong conclusions.

People like that Stanley guy with their "bloke in the pub said" arguments need to take a short walk off a tall cliff.
I don't think Nick is an idiot or a racist but has been hoping and is still hoping something great is going to happen out of all this, but still have not seen how that is going to happen, if someone , anyone could tell me how this is going to be a benefit with serious rational argument then I'd welcome it but in the months leading up to the vote and since the vote ,there is still nothing that is viable in this real and not imaginary world
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Funny how some of the Remain voters are now saying that everything the Leave campaign said was a lie or scaremongering. Sounds like you fell into the same trap of only listening to the likes of Farage - something that you're so quick to criticise a lot of Leave voters for by the way - when if you'd bothered to actually do any research you'd know that there were other facets to the Leave campaign. Here's a link to the Labour Leave campaign website below - perhaps each and every one of you pontificating on here and sneering down your noses at those of us that didn't listen to Farage when arriving at our decision would like to put the time and effort into trying to debunk every point made on the EU facts A-Z list. After all, some of you are hilariously claiming that everything the Leave campaign said is a lie:

http://www.labourleave.org/get-involved/#values
I don't know why I clicked that expecting to be presented with someone new, and not the same tired list of half-truths and bare faced lies as anywhere else.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,816
Broadly speaking, no i did not; moreover, the EU's support of TTIP will damage all three. I also consider Brussels' handing of the migrant crisis as a reason to doubt its competence in that area, which i corroborated by the MSF (an organisation i support).

And i most certainly voted Leave, i'd been waiting fifteen years for such an opportunity.
Why do you think the UK will be in a better position to oppose TTIP and resist US pressure without the EU? The UK bravely opposing US interests isn't something we often witness.

You had the right to veto the thing while in the EU. Now you don't. Of course, after Cameron loudly backed TTIP, its opposition might actually regard Brexit as good news. Without the UK it might actually be more difficult for the US to push it through.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Why do you think the UK will be in a better position to oppose TTIP and resist US pressure without the EU? The UK bravely opposing US interests isn't something we often witness.

You had the right to veto the thing while in the EU. Now you don't. Of course, after Cameron loudly backed TTIP, its opposition might actually regard Brexit as good news. Without the UK it might actually be more difficult for the US to push it through.
We won't be.

Nick's talking a load of rubbish.

We've managed to get ourselves into potentially the only situation possible where we could have TTIP foisted upon us.
 

M18CTID

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
2,506
Location
Gorton
Supports
Manchester City
Tell you what fella, since you want to feck up my country why don't you tell me which of these claims you believe to be true and I'll tell you whether you're right.

Incidentally, the "Labour Leave" campaign was almost entirely funded by Tory donors.
And that my friends proves the point I was making about the narrative running right through this thread.

feck up your country? Jesus wept.
 

Rory 7

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
7,454
Location
A car park in Saipan
I have not heard one sensible rational comment from any Brexiter yet, that includes before the vote and since the vote, not one single sensible reply.
Mate I wanted the UK to remain but surely you have to accept people have the right to be disenfranchised with the EU. Yes it would be better if the UK stayed in but breaking away and renegotiating your relationship is a legitimate position to take; albeit a more moderate one than the guff spun by Farage and Co.
 

fcbforever

New Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2013
Messages
4,077
Location
Merkellandia, the land of silent horrors
Supports
FC Bayern München
Funny how some of the Remain voters are now saying that everything the Leave campaign said was a lie or scaremongering. Sounds like you fell into the same trap of only listening to the likes of Farage - something that you're so quick to criticise a lot of Leave voters for by the way - when if you'd bothered to actually do any research you'd know that there were other facets to the Leave campaign. Here's a link to the Labour Leave campaign website below - perhaps each and every one of you pontificating on here and sneering down your noses at those of us that didn't listen to Farage when arriving at our decision would like to put the time and effort into trying to debunk every point made on the EU facts A-Z list. After all, some of you are hilariously claiming that everything the Leave campaign said is a lie:

http://www.labourleave.org/get-involved/#values
Just some small things.

#1 Animal welfare: Still, 70% of the pork imported to the UK will be produced under illegal circumstances in the EU. Your companies could have tried to import something else before, they didn't, they won't in the future. After all, it's not easy to find a fitting subsitution for 70% of imports.
The UK ban of intensive battery cages will be further ignored. You are not in the EU anymore after all.

#2 Common agricultural policy. It's more like 35%. And the reason the percentage is so high in comparison the others factions mentioned is the fact that the EU budget is really rather tiny. A similar budget with a 35% percent agricultur subvention in the UK would mean a subvention of 0.3% of the GDP into agriculture.

#3 common fisheries policy. That's hardly the EU's fault. Extensive fishing by British trawlers has been a major contributor. At last, Fish stocks are rising again because of regulations. Regulations you can't leavy anyway, no matter of you are part of the EU or not. Most of them are multilateral treaties between countries with North Sea boundaries.

#4 Costs. Alright, you don't have to spend that now. But you will spend something else when you want to enter the commom market again, most likely more than before.
And let's not get to that incompetence argument, it's a bit silly when it's told by Labour of all parties.

#5 Dumping. Do a minimum wage. Germany did as well. And don't you think companies would pay more to british workers when no others would be available. They won't magically get more profitable over night when there's Brexit-day. STUPID argument. Btw, you can't really exit the freedom of movement anyway if you wan't access to the common market. We've been there.
Oh, and about thee bailout options for countries in trouble: try talking about what the EU did NOT allow these countries. Because most likely, these woul have taken even more drastic dumping measures of they could've. And they would have just devalued there money, becoming more competetive overnight.
(I wonder of the people writing this shit have even basic understanding of economics.)

#6 Investment in the UK.
"The strong UK economy and a skilled workforce attract international companies to invest here – not our membership of the EU." Keep telling that to yourself.
"The Head of the world’s biggest car maker, Toyota has pledged to keep building cars here when we vote to leave the EU." Of course they will. Plant is already there. Question is whether they would build another one in the UK in the future. You know, investment.
Exports have fallen? Well somebody decided you don't need to produce anything when there is the City of London, hardly the EU's fault. Not driving your car producers in the ground with stupid workers rights policies might have helped as well, Labour.

#7 Trade deficit won't go away. You can't just shift imports, it's not a trade deficit with the EU, it's one per se, because, again, you don't have an industrial base anymore. Btw, a deficit isn't bad per se as well, if you have a strong 3rd sector in the country.
You wanna know why you have a trade surplus with the rest of the world? You don't have one with Japan, the US or China. The surplus comes because apart from the EU and those few developed countries, the rest of the world is still poor or emerging markets. They are dependent on western goods, nobody should be proud of having a trade surplus with Kongo.
Regarding 3m jobs in the UK depending on the EU and 5m jobs in the EU depending on the UK....5m out of how many people? And 3m out of how many again?
Yeah, stupid argument.

I could just go on and on.

Like, you really believe multinations won't dodge taxes anymore in Britain if you leave the UK? Think again. Norway voted against the EU? Of course they do, they give a rats shit about how much money they pay to the EU and how they have no say in it's processes. The country SHITS money. They can afford it. You can't
One of the more major lies: Less than 50% of exports to the EU. Well, yeah, technically true, but not if you count countries in Europe following EU regulations, like your beloved Switzerland. With them, it's still pretty much 50%.
We wont afford a tarrif war. We will just tell you what to do and you will do it.


Seriously, if that's what you based your vote on, I feel sorry for you.
 

M18CTID

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
2,506
Location
Gorton
Supports
Manchester City
Mate I wanted the UK to remain but surely you have to accept people have the right to be disenfranchised with the EU. Yes it would be better is the UK stayed in but breaking away and renegotiating your relationship is a legitimate position to take; albeit a more moderate one than the guff spun by Farage and Co.
Thanks Rory - good to see someone with a balanced view. FWIW, I was in the Remain camp at the start of the campaign but eventually switched over to leave. I'd say I was 60-40 in favour of leave at the time of the vote and this is the issue I think a lot of leavers and remainers had. Many of them were just on one side rather than the other but could see the pros and cons that of both remaining and leaving.
 

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,831
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
Mate I wanted the UK to remain but surely you have to accept people have the right to be disenfranchised with the EU. Yes it would be better if the UK stayed in but breaking away and renegotiating your relationship is a legitimate position to take; albeit a more moderate one than the guff spun by Farage and Co.
I do not disagree that people could feel disenfranchised by the EU, but if they give a legitimate reason why they feel disenfranchised by the EU, fair enough- but that's the point I'm making, where is this honest truthful reason - people accuse politicians of lying, fair enough, people lie also and are completely misinformed - not because the immigrants are taking all their jobs or the EU makes all Uk laws, it's blatantly untrue
 

Rooney1987

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
6,245
Location
Bradford
Watching some of the US Satirical shows and man are we the greatest embarassment in the world right now.
Predictable and understandable. I've got a few friends in San Francisco and they're gleefully enjoying this. All the crap they get from the worlds press about Trump and the gun issues.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,654
What devilish says is my point:

The leave campaign did make references to countries like Norway or Switzerland without clearly saying how the exact relationship of countries with the EU is: What it exactly entails. It would have become obvious that their promises were not substantiated.

The remain campaign was dumb enough to not point out clearly enough that all those promises made by leave were BS and that this won't change in the future. They also failed to point out the consequences if the UK had treaties with the EU like Canada will have.

Don't get me wrong: I fully respect the outcome of the referendum. All I'm saying is that the leave campaign worked with a bunch of lies and remain wasn't able to highlight this. The deal UK will get won't be better.
They've already began backtracking for half the things they promised so probably the next government(whatever it is) won't get along with them.
 

M18CTID

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
2,506
Location
Gorton
Supports
Manchester City
Just some small things.

#1 Animal welfare: Still, 70% of the pork imported to the UK will be produced under illegal circumstances in the EU. Your companies could have tried to import something else before, they didn't, they won't in the future. After all, it's not easy to find a fitting subsitution for 70% of imports.
The UK ban of intensive battery cages will be further ignored. You are not in the EU anymore after all.

#2 Common agricultural policy. It's more like 35%. And the reason the percentage is so high in comparison the others factions mentioned is the fact that the EU budget is really rather tiny. A similar budget with a 35% percent agricultur subvention in the UK would mean a subvention of 0.3% of the GDP into agriculture.

#3 common fisheries policy. That's hardly the EU's fault. Extensive fishing by British trawlers has been a major contributor. At last, Fish stocks are rising again because of regulations. Regulations you can't leavy anyway, no matter of you are part of the EU or not. Most of them are multilateral treaties between countries with North Sea boundaries.

#4 Costs. Alright, you don't have to spend that now. But you will spend something else when you want to enter the commom market again, most likely more than before.
And let's not get to that incompetence argument, it's a bit silly when it's told by Labour of all parties.

#5 Dumping. Do a minimum wage. Germany did as well. And don't you think companies would pay more to british workers when no others would be available. They won't magically get more profitable over night when there's Brexit-day. STUPID argument. Btw, you can't really exit the freedom of movement anyway if you wan't access to the common market. We've been there.
Oh, and about thee bailout options for countries in trouble: try talking about what the EU did NOT allow these countries. Because most likely, these woul have taken even more drastic dumping measures of they could've. And they would have just devalued there money, becoming more competetive overnight.
(I wonder of the people writing this shit have even basic understanding of economics.)

#6 Investment in the UK.
"The strong UK economy and a skilled workforce attract international companies to invest here – not our membership of the EU." Keep telling that to yourself.
"The Head of the world’s biggest car maker, Toyota has pledged to keep building cars here when we vote to leave the EU." Of course they will. Plant is already there. Question is whether they would build another one in the UK in the future. You know, investment.
Exports have fallen? Well somebody decided you don't need to produce anything when there is the City of London, hardly the EU's fault. Not driving your car producers in the ground with stupid workers rights policies might have helped as well, Labour.

#7 Trade deficit won't go away. You can't just shift imports, it's not a trade deficit with the EU, it's one per se, because, again, you don't have an industrial base anymore. Btw, a deficit isn't bad per se as well, if you have a strong 3rd sector in the country.
You wanna know why you have a trade surplus with the rest of the world? You don't have ne with Japan, the US or China. THe surplus comes because apart from the EU and those few developed countries, the rest of the world still poor or emerging markets. They are dependent on western goods, nobody should be proud of having a trade surplus with Kongo.
Regarding 3m jobs in the UK depending on the EU and 5m jobs in the EU depending on the UK....5m out of how many people? And 3m out of how many again?
Yeah, stupid argument.

I could just go on and on.

Like, you really believe multinations won't dodge taxes anymore in Britain if you leave the UK? Think again. Norway voted against the EU? Of course they do, they give a rats shit about how much money they pay to the EU and how they have no say in it's processes. The country SHITS money. They can afford it. You can't
One of the more major lies: Less than 50% of exports to the EU. Well, yeah, technically true, but not if you count countries in Europe following EU regulations, like your beloved Switzerland. With them, it's still pretty much 50%.
We wont afford a tarrif war. We will just tell you what to do and you will do it.


Seriously, if that's what you based your vote on, I feel sorry for you.
No it's not entirely what I based by vote on but at least you took the time out to read it - my point was that not everything coming from the leave side was lies and that there were other facets to the campaign too.

Re Norway - they're not shitting money as much as they were. It might've escaped your attention but 38,000 jobs in the oil and gas industry have been lost in Norway in the past few years and Norway is more heavily reliant on oil and gas than the UK. It's not the EU's fault that 38,000 jobs have been lost because it's down to circumstances beyond their control but the EU haven't done anything particularly pro-active in trying to alleviate the situation.

Much of everything else you state is just an opinion on how you think things will pan out - I respect that opinion but that's all it is. An opinion. No-one knows how it will turn out because there has been no previous precedent where a country has left the EU.

"We will just tell you what to do and you will do it." Is your name Jean-Claude Juncker? :lol: I think you'll find that there will be negotiations and compromises on both sides - if you think the UK will just be "told what to do" then you really need to have a word with yourself.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
We wont afford a tarrif war. We will just tell you what to do and you will do it.
I voted Remain but I think you are deluded if you believe that. Several major European markets plummeted into bear market conditions after Brexit. The UK markets suffered but not as badly. Italy is close to a banking crisis and bailouts could be on the cards. Italy is responsible for one third of the Eurozone banking debt.

The British economy is comfortably better equipped to cope with this crisis than the Eurozone.

Add to that the rise of leave campaigns in other countries and I estimate the EU bargaining position as a lot weaker than you do.

Not to mention that America will be leaning on the EU to be sensible.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
Having spent a few days posting little snippets of anger and exasperation, I have a slightly longer take, and an explanation of why I am incredibly worried about the political future of our country:

In one sentence, the Leave campaign, and the right more generally, have created a horribly and incurably toxic political situation within our country.

The Leave vote is at its heart a rejection of the status quo. It is people who feel that the current economic order is not serving them expressing that anger. Racism and xenophobia thrive in such an environment, and those campaigning for Leave have presented it as an easy solution to the economic stagnation many have felt whilst also pandering to those fears.

But the EU, and freedom of movement within it, are not to blame for their economic stagnation and struggles. Suggesting otherwise is a horribly poisonous thing to have done:

1. The EU may be an ally of the globalisation and market capitalism that has left the working classes behind, but leaving cannot cure globalisation's failings. To combat the ills of globalisation you need the opposite of a retreat into the nation state. You need countries to work together to develop a more equitable settlement.

2. Leaving will in fact make the economy worse in the short to medium term. Investment will fall. Regeneration projects will falter. National debt will rise or services will be further cut. If the Conservatives are truly to dedicated to radically rolling back the state Brexit offers the perfect excuse to go further.

And so we have a situation in which people who are struggling economically have been encouraged to make a decision that will only make things worse for them economically in the short term. But not only that, the campaign preyed upon fears about their country being overrun by swarms of foreigners. That it was no longer sufficiently English. That their services and schools couldn't cope with the burden of foreigners. Fears like these are easy to stoke in the febrile atmosphere of economic uncertainty, but far less easy to cure.

What happens in 5 years time when those areas left behind by globalisation have stagnated even further in the wake of Brexit? These voters have their country back, but it is not getting better for them in the short term. Will they be placated by the promise that now we are leaving things will get better with time? Or does the anti-immigration sentiment this referendum has fuelled grow? What is preventing the anger that was directed at the arrival of immigrants from shifting to demanding the deportation of those who are already here?

The Leave vote is the product of anti-elitism and xenophobia, fuelled by the failings of globalised capitalism to deliver growth and prosperity to the western working class. Within England however, the Leave vote has created the perfect opportunity for the far-right to grow and thrive.
Great post, totally agreed
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,476
So according to Cameron if the paper headlines are to be believed. It was the fault of the EU why there was a leave vote. No it's all down to you Mr Cameron. And your legacy will show that you took us out of Europe and the break up of the United Kingdom.
Yep and it's amazing to think someone who has done so much damage got into power first time around without even winning a majority. Think about that after a recession the opposition should have won by a landslide. And he couldn't even muster enough votes to get elected on his own without forming a coalition.

He only got re-elected on the back of promising this Referendum, which he completely misjudged and fecked up. And all that without even mentioning the damage he's done to the NHS, or the Austerity forced upon people over the last few years to preserve a AAA credit rating which is now down the shitter anyway.

Has to go down as the worst Prime Minister in modern history and a moron.
 

M18CTID

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
2,506
Location
Gorton
Supports
Manchester City
I voted Remain but I think you are deluded if you believe that. Several major European markets plummeted into bear market conditions after Brexit. The UK markets suffered but not as badly. Italy is close to a banking crisis and bailouts could be on the cards. Italy is responsible for one third of the Eurozone banking debt.

The British economy is comfortably better equipped to cope with this crisis than the Eurozone.

Add to that the rise of leave campaigns in other countries and I estimate the EU bargaining position as a lot weaker than you do.

Not to mention that America will be leaning on the EU to be sensible.
Exactly. There's so much to play out on this yet. Telling people that UK will just do as it's told is ignorant, arrogant, and naive. I think what we will see over the coming months is a more conciliatory tone from both the UK and the EU - it's not like Farage is going to be conducting negotiations:lol:
 

Rory 7

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
7,454
Location
A car park in Saipan
I do not disagree that people could feel disenfranchised by the EU, but if they give a legitimate reason why they feel disenfranchised by the EU, fair enough- but that's the point I'm making, where is this honest truthful reason - people accuse politicians of lying, fair enough, people lie also and are completely misinformed - not because the immigrants are taking all their jobs or the EU makes all Uk laws, it's blatantly untrue
The treatment of Ireland by the EU would be reason enough alone to leave. We were completely shafted on the banking issue, whereby the EU essentially bullied us into not burning bond holders. As a small country we didn't have much choice but the way the EU imposed its will on this country after our bail out is evidence enough of just how the EU works. Our sovereignty was for all intents and purposes handed over. Britain is different, it can stand up to the EU and that's what your government should have done.

If Cameron has any balls he wouldn't have resigned on Friday. He would have used the result as a bargaining chip and gone back to the EU looking for real reform. Instead he's let the extreme right win. He's a coward. Cameron had the opportunity to force real change as a result of this referendum but he had wasted that chance. Now we will have the worst of both sides dictating the future of Europe.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Exactly. There's so much to play out on this yet. Telling people that UK will just do as it's told is ignorant, arrogant, and naive. I think what we will see over the coming months is a more conciliatory tone from both the UK and the EU - it's not like Farage is going to be conducting negotiations:lol:
There will be compromise whatever happens I'm sure.
 

rcoobc

Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
41,702
Location
C-137
Yep and it's amazing to think someone who has done so much damage got into power first time around without even winning a majority. Think about that after a recession the opposition should have won by a landslide. And he couldn't even muster enough votes to get elected on his own without forming a coalition.

He only got re-elected on the back of promising this Referendum, which he completely misjudged and fecked up. And all that without even mentioning the damage he's done to the NHS, or the Austerity forced upon people over the last few years to preserve a AAA credit rating which is now down the shitter anyway.

Has to go down as the worst Prime Minister in modern history and a moron.
To be fair to the tories, they got a higher percentage of the vote than Labour did in 2005.

They almost got as many actual votes as Labour did in 2001 too although a big drop as a percentage (very low turnout in 2001).

They then secured an absolute majority of seats, increasing the number and percentage of voters, which is almost unprecedented.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
I think you're basing too much on the strength of the EU economy, which is worth much much less without the EU. If the EU takes Scotland and Frankfurt takes the investment banks which is a huge possibility, the UK negotiating position is pretty fecked.
Scotland isn't going anywhere before we leave completely. Tusk refused to meet Sturgeon deeming it 'irresponsible'. Breaking up the UK only further inflames the issues across the world. Banks and businesses will be considering their options of course but making decisions before a clearer picture is presented would simply be stupid.

The Eurozone is failing currency, why would any business jump from a crisis zone straight into a worse one?
 

ClutchHunter

Full Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2011
Messages
2,876
It's hidden behind a pay wall. Have you got a decent summary?
This link may work: http://www.ft.com/fastft/2016/06/28/vodafone-to-consider-hq-move-after-brexit/

If not:

Vodafone has signaled that it could consider moving its headquarters out of the UK given uncertainty about how many of the “positive attributes” of being in the EU will remain once Britain has exited the bloc.

The telecoms group, which was founded in the 1980s in the UK but now generates the majority of its revenues overseas, said that it was not possible “to draw any firm conclusions regarding the long-term location for the headquarters of the group”,reports Daniel Thomas in London.

In a statement, the group said that it would “continue to evaluate the situation and will take whatever decisions are appropriate in the interests of our customers, shareholders and employees”.

Vodafone said that it was committed to supporting UK customers and would continue to invest in the local UK operating company in future. The group, which has more than 13,000 workers in the UK, is headquartered in London but has its local operations in Newbury.

The majority of its 462m customers, 108,000 employees and 15,000 suppliers are based outside the UK, it added, with European businesses excluding the UK accounting for 55 per cent of group earnings. The UK only accounts for 11 per cent of group earnings.

Vodafone said that the UK’s membership of the EU has been an important factor in the growth of the company, stressing that freedom of movement of people, capital and goods were “integral to the operation of any pan-European business as are single legal frameworks spanning all member states”. It also highlighted the emerging digital single market.

But it added: “It remains unclear at this point how many of those positive attributes will remain in place once the process of the UK’s exit from the European Union has been completed. It is therefore not yet possible to draw any firm conclusions regarding the long-term location for the headquarters of the group.

As a first step, the company said that it would strengthen Vodafone’s regulatory and public policy activities in Brussels to ensure that the businesses within the EU would continue to be represented.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,547