I have. And they lied. They lie all the time and at every chance. They lie when they talk about Ireland, they lie when they talk about France. They lie when they talk about the EU and they lie when they talk about borders.
There may come a time when the EU will cross the line with the most hardened remainers. It's interesting how far people would be willing to go before enough would be enough.
This is where you're going wrong. Don't believe them.
What vision? They all have their own non-sensical “ideas” that would be unrealistic if written in a GCSE economics exam
Why do you feel so threatened by the EU? In the modern globalised world, all interactions involve give and take, particularly if you are an island of 70m in a world of behemoths like the US, China and India. Surely it’s better to be together with a neighbouring bloc of 500m, most of whom have broadly similar values to your own and in which you have a very powerful voice.
March 2013 negotiations started with japan for a FTA so about 6 years, but trade negotiations leading to the FTA started in 2002.
Just because James wanted it all doesn't mean Scotland isn't an English colony ruled from London even if limited autonomy has now been given to back, like shiny beads as gifts to the natives. Wales was annexed again by England in the 15th century and we all know our disgraceful history in Ireland. United union my arse.
Trump and the Mexican's pay.
How dare you bring evidence and facts in to this.Which isn't that unusual but it's the fact they then mock others for predictions backed up by the treasury, businesses, economists and do so arrogantly. Most discussion in here is backed up in some fashion or other.
No doubt this I'll be that unwelcoming leftists being mean to the right leaning nonsense
Yet your Monarch is English and you are ruled from London. However, Scotland got there it is an English colony.
I was around. So what? And you know who else was around? The experts and decision-makers in the article who were far from enthusiastic about joining the Euro. Very different to how you described it.
Hardly surprising. It's jut to appease those who voted against her yesterday so they back off until Brexit is somehow resolved.
Blair and Major are knobs. The EU is imperfect. Obviously. Any organisation of that size is. Nevertheless there is no viable plan which presents leaving as being better than remaining - only some which mitigate the worst of the damage.
We're ruled from London but have a say in who rules us to an extent that's roughly proportionate to our population. We had a Scottish PM a decade or so ago and have had some in the past. I'd say a colony is generally subjected to foreign rule; our rulers in the 1700s actively chose to join up with England because they thought they could get a lot out of it. I'm no unionist (the opposite actually) but we benefited massively from the union at the time.
That is one of the many flaws of democracy. The original intention of it has been slowly twisted after so many decades.
There are current benefits to being in a Union, just like there are benefits to Britain being in the EU. I was really just commenting that the idea that a border of sorts in the North Sea not working because we are the or a United Kingdom doesn't really mean much.
The CBE recently published an economic forecast for all Brexit scenarios. It was all over the news about 2 weeks ago. You should look it up.
Yes emotive stuff but the fact remains Scotland was never a colony, entered willing into the partnership that was the union, and was not subjugated in the brutal manner that Ireland was. To equate the two is historical bunkum and has only gained recent credence due to a crap film
Scotland is currently a colony however it was achieved. James wanted to own everything and by the time of the political union Scotland already has an English Monarch so was in a personal union already. Hardly a free joining of equals.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Dear lord. They actually don't understand the whole process, do they? Or maybe they do and they think the public are really thick? Which says a lot, too. Maybe they need a "Trade for Dummies" course or something.
Was Scotland settled by the English? Scotland and England are a Union not a Colony. By any terms that Colony is understood, I don't see quite how Scotland is one.
We rule/own them.
And you Uncle smelt of elderberries?
Scotland is a country with its own traditions and ways of doing things yet it has representation in Westminster and also its own Parliament, in no terms is it ruled any differently to how England is ruled, or Wales. Scotland has the right to self-determination and as for colony I am willing to bet that a damn sight more Scots have settled in England than English have ever settled in Scotland. If the Scots don't like and haven't enjoyed austerity for the last 8 years then it is no more liked by the English. Freedom!
Not anymore, these last twenty years he has smelt dead thank you.And you Uncle smelt of elderberries?
I'm not sure Monty Python would like that answer.
But you are not French either Wibbs
It’s all so surreal. Like the whole thing is a parody and none of us are in on the joke.
Ohhh. So you have to be fat to be stout now do you?But you are not French either Wibbs
Freedom!Ohhh. So you have to be fat to be stout now do you?
Don't you oppress me.
This makes little sense I'm afraid, they are working for their electorate by pushing the agenda on which they were elected to office. The fact this differs from the government reflects the elecorates split views/interests.
