- Joined
- Jun 23, 2015
- Messages
- 2,644
God you’d think Sir Jim had said he was torching Old Trafford and hanging Fergie from the rafters.
Try a bit of positivity for once for feck sake.
Try a bit of positivity for once for feck sake.
yeah. i’d rather no investment whatsoever.Outside of a hedge fund buying us that's a load of bollocks isn't it
25% with no option to buy it all, 300m investment into the stadium when it needs over a billion
Not blinded by this shitty deal one bit
Of course it will changeThis is why I wanted Qatar btw, all this is utter BS. Nothing will change
Good statementTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It’s a fact. SJR is own record telling INEOS creditors that none of INEOS’ money will be used to finance the takeover or project.& so the moaning begins
Agreed. Very well written and makes direct challenges that are now down to Ratcliffe to addressesGood statement
Kaveh the robot not impressed. Think he wanted the fake sheik.
Not the massive changes we wanted and needed long term. Why would Jim put his money into something he has no full control over or full owns? The lack of full ownership clause is a major concern for me, all the rumours were just to keep fans happy it seems.Of course it will change
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Exactly. It is better for everyone that the Glazers retain full control over everything!yeah. i’d rather no investment whatsoever.
I'm determined to at least hope this is a first positive step, even if its just we now have a much quicker acting football operational side, but can't help but worry that your concerns are very much valid.And rightly so
Look at the deal its awful
Sir Jim/ Qatar whoever takes control I couldn't care less but at 25% its awful for the club
300m dollars will get us a new roof at OT and a new coat of paint
Glazers were on their knees and Jim has given them a lifeline.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
300 mill can be a down payment on expansion or the development of a new stadium. The process will require a loan no matter who the owner is.And rightly so
Look at the deal its awful
Sir Jim/ Qatar whoever takes control I couldn't care less but at 25% its awful for the club
300m dollars will get us a new roof at OT and a new coat of paint
Glazers were on their knees and Jim has given them a lifeline.
Where have you been?25% is madness.
fecking parasites. feck off
Yes ok, 100%. why spend 300 million when they can spend none. Better not investOutside of a hedge fund buying us that's a load of bollocks isn't it
25% with no option to buy it all, 300m investment into the stadium when it needs over a billion
Not blinded by this shitty deal one bit
It will be for the training ground and infrastructure.300 mill can be a down payment on expansion or the development of a new stadium. The process will require a loan no matter who the owner is.
Easy there Tucker...a handful of anti-Qatar woke zealots virtual signalling
That's just terminology, the current board have to make the "request" in order to delegate the power as the power currently rests with them, it doesn't mean it was the board's idea.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He can only sack a quarter of himHave they sacked ten hag yet?
2.5 HagHe can only sack a quarter of him
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This the best thing about this. Potentially worst ever thread for quality.Thank fukc something has finally happened. This abomination of a thread can now be closed. 2429 pages with 2400 being a handful of anti-Qatar woke zealots virtual signalling the same half a dozen points time and time and time again while slagging anyone with a different opinion, 24 about finance and 5 about football. Thank God it's no longer needed to quickly check for updates. It's over. What a glorious day.
That tickled me more than it should have.He can only sack a quarter of him
I know (I literally made this thread).Where have you been?
It’s always been a thing since the summer that it was going to be 25%
He can only sack a quarter of him
If investment is coming in I’d want a proper job being done. You’re accepting mediocrity on day 1 well doneYes ok, 100%. why spend 300 million when they can spend none. Better not invest
Glazers want. 1) profits without involvement in what they don’t care about. 2) a shield from public backlash.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date