Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

phelans shorts

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
27,217
Location
Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
Ronaldo has pretty much said Carrington is exactly the same as when he left it in 2009. 13+ years without any sort of improvement or modernisation for a club like United is criminal. Read up about what he said about the swimming pool as a prime example.

As for OT, if you've been there, you'll know it needs a massive refurbishing job at the very least!
I don’t give a feck what that prick has to say about anything, because he’s about a reliable a source on anything as any narcissist.

I’ve got a season ticket, I go to stadiums all over the country/continent. Old Trafford is much, much closer to the top of the list of stadiums than the bottom.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,072
Location
Austria
The stadium is far from tragic. I can only assume you’ve not been to many others if you think it is.

What exactly needs demolishing at Carrington? Why?
You can't be serious when it comes to OT. Been to the Allianz' arenas in Munich and Vienna and both are on another level when it comes to the facility. I'm not saying a completely new stadium is needed but OT needs a huge refurbishment and has for years.
 

Mmxxii

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 14, 2022
Messages
25
Stadium expansion: £800M
Increase in attendance: 40%
Increase in revenue: £41M
Loan costs over 25 years: £32M+ interests.

A new stadium would pay for itself.
How much interest do you think Utd will incur on a 25-year loan?

I would think at least 7%
 

Sushi Kagawa

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 14, 2012
Messages
151
Stadium expansion: £800M
Increase in attendance: 40%
Increase in revenue: £41M
Loan costs over 25 years: £32M+ interests.

A new stadium would pay for itself.
800mill isn't even close. Renovation would be well over a billion and a full rebuild would be about 2billion according to reports.
 

phelans shorts

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
27,217
Location
Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
You can't be serious when it comes to OT. Been to the Allianz' arenas in Munich and Vienna and both are on another level when it comes to the facility. I'm not saying a completely new stadium is needed but OT needs a huge refurbishment and has for years.
So on an incredibly small sample size you’ve decided we need a new stadium?

The Munich Allianz ain’t even a particularly good place to watch football. I’d definitely have it below Old Trafford as a sporting venue.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,988
So on an incredibly small sample size you’ve decided we need a new stadium?

The Munich Allianz ain’t even a particularly good place to watch football. I’d definitely have it below Old Trafford as a sporting venue.
I do think our stadium is extremely worn and I'm dire need of renovation or rebuild.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,072
Location
Austria
So on an incredibly small sample size you’ve decided we need a new stadium?

The Munich Allianz ain’t even a particularly good place to watch football. I’d definitely have it below Old Trafford as a sporting venue.
Mate actually visiting OT and watching games there was enough to see that. You don't even need to compare it to other stadiums. It's in a dire state.
 

phelans shorts

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
27,217
Location
Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
I do think our stadium is extremely worn and I'm dire need of renovation or rebuild.
I’m not saying it doesn’t need any work at all, but it’s not this urgent necessity that it’s being made out to be. There’s far more pressing issues.
Mate actually visiting OT and watching games there was enough to see that. You don't even need to compare it to other stadiums. It's in a dire state.
I go every week, often a couple of times, it’s absolutely not in a dire state. You’d have an aneurysm if you went to the San Siro for instance.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,265
Location
Where the grass is greener.
We don’t need a new stadium, we probably don’t need a new training ground (I’ve never been so I’ve no idea, just as I’m betting you don’t) so that makes everything a lot easier
We need both of those things.Or at least both need to be massively renovated. You can pretend we don’t if you’d like.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,540
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Yeah with how much we need I do think so
Thing is, we would be free to compete financially if we weren’t shackled by paying for the pleasure of being owned by the Glazers (debt/dividends). We do a pretty good job currently inspite of that.
I don’t think anybody is going to come in and drop another few billion for a stadium straight away - I’m pretty sure it would be funded by borrowing and sponsorships the way Spurs and Arsenal have - even with oil money.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,072
Location
Austria
I’m not saying it doesn’t need any work at all, but it’s not this urgent necessity that it’s being made out to be. There’s far more pressing issues.

I go every week, often a couple of times, it’s absolutely not in a dire state. You’d have an aneurysm if you went to the San Siro for instance.
Which is why they build a new one
 

Laurencio

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
3,220
How much interest do you think Utd will incur on a 25-year loan?

I would think at least 7%
Probably a lot lower than that, but even at that interest the increase in revenue covers it.

It is worth noting that there are plenty of places we can borrow money at better rates than that though.
 

Zippycup

New Member
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
1,041
This is the sensible approach. We would ‘like’ a stadium and training ground refurb, but neither are absolute necessities.
I think the modern player likes to have the best training facilities available. It could be the difference between a player joining or not.
The few million it would take to upgrade the training ground would be money well spent.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,072
Location
Austria
It was in a much worse state 20 years ago than Old Trafford is now. That’s one of the better Italian stadiums too.

There’s far bigger issues.
The last point I agree with. Which doesn't change the notion that it would be nice to have an owner that is happy to invest and I don't see that with Ratcliffe. Not in the places he's been so far at least. Maybe that changes when he decides to buy us for a few billions. Which I still highly doubt.
 

Woziak

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
3,765
Not if he offers £3b it won’t. They’re looking for big money and he will offer what he feels United are worth, not what they want.
This is true but he won’t be the only bidder, they will have at least 5 or 6 who pass the financial tests set by the raine group and then some of these bidders will fall away to 2 or 3 serious parties, we’ve heard already that there is an American, Asian and Middle East interest. There may be a joint bid with Qatar investment and Indian with someone like Beckham as the figure head.

The Dubai Sovereign wealth fund are clearly in the running, and you have to assume at least one very credible American investor. We just need to be patient as long as it’s not a partial buyout and all of the glaziers siblings relinquish all shares in the club, it can only be good news as the new owners would have to pay off the debt first and for the first time in 18 years we would be debt free. A leveraged buy out this time is not on the agenda and talk of Ineos being cheap skate owners, I’m not so sure that’s fair either.

Would they be perfect no, are any owners really perfect, PSG and City have the so called perfect owners for over a decade but neither has won a champions league, with all that wealth at their disposal , something the hated Glaziers have done and they also reached the same 2 CL final defeats as well plus that one victory.

We just want our club back, no debt, good stewards who care and love the club put in charge and a wining football team for the men, woman and youth. We don’t want football mercenaries ever again and people in charge like Ed Woodward who failed miserably.
 

Messier1994

The Swedish Rumble
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,368
That’s interesting. I would have thought that for the selling club being able to point to X amount of guaranteed income for several years would be helpful given the rolling nature that FFP takes (it does I think?) but I’m no accountant so anything beyond the utter basics when it comes to FFP is beyond me
I am no accountant either, but it shouldn't impact the earnings.

I think it is one of those PE/management consultants' invention. The cost of paying 100m -- after 12 months -- is not 100m. It is perhaps 97m since you can get interest on the 97m for 12 months. The cost of paying 100m after 36 months is perhaps 91m instead of 100m. Some management consultant comes in and say I bet I can save you 5m if you pay me 500k for a months job, and come up with a bunch of stuff like this. An executive of a football club is under pretty much scrutiny. When you negotiate a football transfer, its important that the numbers announced looks good. The nitty gritty terms might not be as important. I bet a buying club has a pretty strong position if it comes to negotiating that a transfer fee should be paid out over x number of years. If we buy players for 150m per year, and manage to get an average pay-out time 12 months down the road, its a little money. Its using all possible small venues to improve the profit that the PE investors do really well. There are many examples of really large groups going from breaking even to making 5-10% profit by only taking small measures.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,955
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Yep. I don't genuinely get people worrying. Our knew owners will be filthy rich. It's as if people don't realise the scale of this opportunity of owning us.
Exactly. For reference, a basket ball team, the Phoenix suns, were sold in December for $4b.

The sale price was 13x their yearly revenue.

We’re going to go for an insane amount.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,617
Location
Barrow In Furness
We need a new stadium, training ground and quality players. Good luck financing that all with our current revenues alone.
Especially is the new owners decide to take a big chunk of the revenue for themselves, the bigger the group of investors, the bigger slice of the pie they will want.
 

Compton22

Knows that he knows nothing.
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,393
I don’t give a feck what that prick has to say about anything, because he’s about a reliable a source on anything as any narcissist.

I’ve got a season ticket, I go to stadiums all over the country/continent. Old Trafford is much, much closer to the top of the list of stadiums than the bottom.
So a player who actually went to the training ground and independent bodies who are paid to assess the work that needs to be done at OT can't be trusted? They're just saying that it's well behind other comparable facilities in the country for shits and giggles? :rolleyes:
 

phelans shorts

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
27,217
Location
Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
So a player who actually went to the training ground and independent bodies who are paid to assess the work that needs to be done at OT can't be trusted? They're just saying that it's well behind other comparable facilities in the country for shits and giggles? :rolleyes:
What did these independent bodies say exactly? Then I might listen to, a trademark narcissist I won’t give time of day.
 

Messier1994

The Swedish Rumble
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,368
It was in a much worse state 20 years ago than Old Trafford is now. That’s one of the better Italian stadiums too.

There’s far bigger issues.
I think you make a good point, and it is always important to see the whole picture when analyzing a situation.

The narrative is that the club 'must' do this and that. In reality it is a bit more complex. What is abundantly clear is that we are:
(a) Not setting aside any funds to improve the infrastructure.
(b) Not paying off our debt, that is significant, instead its increasing.
(c) We do not have any margins to do the above, we would have to do "a Tottenham" or "a Leicester" to have any chance to spend on the infrastructure
(d) We are a club that benefits greatly from being really big, the others can only compete with our profits if they win the PL/CL while we struggle. But this won't last forever. We are big because we were great. Kids of today don't nearly become United fans to the same extent. If we take 10 years to get the club in order, we would rob Peter to pay Paul, lose commercial incomes from our market position to gain incomes from the infrastructure.

We cannot keep running this club without being able to set aside funds for -- large -- investments in the infrastructure. Even if OT and Carrington could probably be used for another 10 years, there is definitely an underlying problem that is unsustainable. In addition, improving these things will probably be beneficial to do, sooner rather than later.

Lastly, like we are seeing from Chelsea and Manchester City -- it is absolutely crucial to have a youth academy that produces sellable players on a regular basis to compete at the highest level. To get there, it also requires investments that we cannot afford. If you buy kids for 45m every summer, it will pay off. We did it for a while under Solskjaer, but at other times we do nothing becuase we don't have the transfer funds.
 

Laurencio

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
3,220
Especially is the new owners decide to take a big chunk of the revenue for themselves, the bigger the group of investors, the bigger slice of the pie they will want.
Thanks to FFP not including infrastructure investments you could theoretically spend more on players by building a new stadium.

Loan the club a sizable percentage of the cost interest free (or at a ridiculously low interest) from the owner company with a long down payment plan. Borrow the rest at sensible interest rates from various sources. That results in an incrimental increase in yearly revenue that in turn increases the room the club has for investment, and opens up opportunities for stand and stadium sponsorships to further increase revenue.

It is worth noting that an oil state could technically build a new stadium without it costing the club a single pound. It would be a silly thing to do but they could.
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,719
800mill isn't even close. Renovation would be well over a billion and a full rebuild would be about 2billion according to reports.
Yeah £800m is nowhere near enough, at least twice that given work required on stadium and training ground.

The Glazers have maxed out their borrowing options. To raise 1.5 billion the Glazers would have to sell off around 30-35 percent of their shares. That means each Glazer giving up a third or close to half of their shares for nothing because it all has to go back into the club.

You’ve still got a huge debt that limits spending and probably a sustained period of lost revenue whilst stadium is renovated/rebuilt to cope with. It’s untenable for Glazers to continue and new owners are going to have to inject a lot of cash or have capacity to borrow lots which isn’t leveraged on the club.
 

fezzerUTD

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 26, 2015
Messages
1,331
Not a lot compared to other "sugar daddies". And on shit mostly
Why would he spend millions trying to get Nice to be the second best team in France? The ROI will be minuscule, the prize money and tv rights money will be fecking terrible. He isn’t stupid hence why he’s got money in the first place.

He could build a club which gradually gets in the top 3 in France and get in the CL without blowing money allover the place.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Why would he spend millions trying to get Nice to be the second best team in France? The ROI will be minuscule, the prize money and tv rights money will be fecking terrible. He isn’t stupid hence why he’s got money in the first place.

He could build a club which gradually gets in the top 3 in France and get in the CL without blowing money allover the place.
So why would he back anything more than a top 4 spot for United based on this logic
 

Telsim

Full Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2021
Messages
4,985
If I remember correctly he hired his brother.

I’d rather have The Glazers than Sir Jim, everything about his potential buy is giving me nothing but worry
The parasites have to go at all costs, but something about Ratcliffe does rub me the wrong way. The whole "he is a fan, so he will do a better job" angle doesn't fly with me. It's based on nothing but wishful thinking and make believe. Very naive. The man didn't care about poisoning the land and the people to make profit. He will do anything to that end. I don't trust him to run the club competently. Besides, he isn't exactly young. Even if he does run the club well, he could be dead soon. Who knows what kind of corporate scum will inherit the club then? If I have to choose between Glazer and Ratcliffe, I'll go with the latter. But oil money for me is by far the best outcome. At least they have the money to compensate for other shortcomings.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,955
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Here me out on this wild idea lads, but how about, we don't build a new stadium next season and we focus on squad building, then maybe in a couple of years when we're more competitive we can build a new stadium?

That way we don't have to blow up the budget on day one for no reason.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,433
Location
left wing
Here me out on this wild idea lads, but how about, we don't build a new stadium next season and we focus on squad building, then maybe in a couple of years when we're more competitive we can build a new stadium?

That way we don't have to blow up the budget on day one for no reason.
This kind of thinking is how you end up with a crumbling stadium and outdated training facilities. The Glazers are only embarking on this process, because they know that they cannot afford to fund the necessary infrastructure spending from the club's own cashflow. They either need to find a partner or accept a full sale.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,072
Location
Austria
Guys it's not about getting a new/refurbed stadium next year. Or even start planning it next year. But it will become an issue in the foreseeable future and thus I want owners that actually have the funds or at least the willingness to get this done. Ratcliffe sure has things going for him, his sporting investments are a bit of a failure so far though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.