I don't see how the things go hand in hand it's an investment nothing more. I don't understand this revolutionist theory that if a certain buyer purchases a club they must change their own philosophies / laws to conform because it's an investment. There are valid issues within their own countries rightly so but this can be said about almost every nation that is in existence today.
Football for example includes diversity and inclusion (races, ethnicities etc) and there are various relative financial institutions around club infrastructure who in their executive fields of hierarchy lack diversity so must football enforce that any club that has ties with any of world leading private bank have them reform their policies to ensure they are compliant with diversity in their corporate structures as a reflection ? The same can be said for brands that create kits, boots and sponsors who somehow will use unfair trading practices in less developed countries to help bolster profit margins and use trade policies to import those products and distribute them. If that's the case then cull Cadbury as a partner because most cocoa comes from poverty ridden farmers in Africa who are paid pittance and enforce child labour while these companies reap profits in the billions. Why are there no threads on this ?
The reality is that the world is inherently flawed and if there's extravagance to ostracize one don't forget the rest.
Still feels surreal .. My Tribe owns Man United. 