I feel like the pro-Ineos posters in this thread are pro-Ineos just because they are anti-Qatar or anti-State backed bids. Claiming that our club would be a play thing, citing examples like Malaga or PSG, without acknowledging the fact that Malaga and PSG were a nothing club, before they hit the jackpot. Lazy comparisons all around. They will not even entertain the potential idea that our juggernaut of a football club can be ran successfully under a state backed regime.
I have not seen any pro-Ineos posters actually stating any belief in Ratcliffe's ability in running a football club, whilst conveniently ignoring the fact that our club will still be debt ridden and Glazers will still be in the club during a Ratcliffe era.
It's like they've been pro-Ineos for 1000+ pages in this thread, so they might as well die on this hill. Regardless of whatever negative info pops up with Ratcliffe.