DOTA
wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2012
- Messages
- 24,504
I think that's fair.Im fairly confident that’s exactly what I’m thinking of but until I see the news on Boomerang I am believing nothing.
I think that's fair.Im fairly confident that’s exactly what I’m thinking of but until I see the news on Boomerang I am believing nothing.
Nah. INEOS was pushing PR through english sports journos. Bloomberg and Reuters are legit highly rated financial news establishments.Which time is it that they are "confident"? Sixth? Tenth? INEOS have also been confident on many occasions.
Personally I don't hold them in as high regard as some do. Being better than tabloids or twitter ITKs doesn't take much. Anything based on the words of sources close to the source is more likely to be wrong than right, no matter who is reporting it.Already destroyed if you know world news.
Not sure "Ineos remains confident in their bid" was PR. Unless you meant something else.Nah. INEOS was pushing PR through english sports journos. Bloomberg and Reuters are legit highly rated financial news establishments.
These bidders are two of the most confident guys ever. No matter how many times they get played for fools by a bunch of people whose entire looks could be described as “ageing sex offender chic”, the two lads are absolutely delighted with themselves.
It'll probably turn out that you were the source, they overheard you through a window.The guys who wrote the bloomberg article are just the floor below mine. Might give them a visit
I wouldn't dare to joke about our new overlords, fellow Citizen!This is a joke right?
Call him Mr. Jassim call him Mr. JimThese bidders are two of the most confident guys ever. No matter how many times they get played for fools by a bunch of people whose entire looks could be described as “ageing sex offender chic”, the two lads are absolutely delighted with themselves.
You'd have to go back in time, and delete about a hundred years of history and 60 trophies for us to be like the berties.Oh great. We're becoming Manchester City II now.
These bidders are two of the most confident guys ever. No matter how many times they get played for fools by a bunch of people whose entire looks could be described as “ageing sex offender chic”, the two lads are absolutely delighted with themselves.
ChilevisionReuters and Bloomberg are both very solid. Only source more reliable than them is Chilevision, but they have not reported on this takeover for some reason.
20
Glazers are insaneCall him Mr. Jassim call him Mr. Jim
Call them Mr. Vain
Where's that bloody ban hammer when you need it?fellow Citizen!
I got a funny feeling it will not be this time.It’ll get downplayed soon. It’s how this works
Possible. They've certainly been very vocal these past three weeks.
We never had the Football clubs, someone else has always owned the club.Also, a reminder that, Qatar winning doesn't mean we (meaning the fans) have our football club back. It means someone else has it.
ExcellentQatarrington
No fans own their clubs in the PL. If it means we’re debt free and have a set of owners who instead of bleeding the club dry actually invest in the club with the ambition of returning us to the top then bring it fecking on!!Also, a reminder that, Qatar winning doesn't mean we (meaning the fans) have our football club back. It means someone else has it.
Hey, they also have a history. It's just a shit history!You'd have to go back in time, and delete about a hundred years of history and 60 trophies for us to be like the berties.
We haven’t had our football club since before Louis Edwards with that logicAlso, a reminder that, Qatar winning doesn't mean we (meaning the fans) have our football club back. It means someone else has it.
Not trying to be confrontational or anything here mate, but I'm genuinely curious. What exactly does having our football club back mean to you?Also, a reminder that, Qatar winning doesn't mean we (meaning the fans) have our football club back. It means someone else has it.
Thanks for the laugh, amazing.Also, a reminder that, Qatar winning doesn't mean we (meaning the fans) have our football club back. It means someone else has it.
Dude if our club is winning we are enjoying. You never had or owned the club anyway. We enjoying supporting the club and attending the games.Also, a reminder that, Qatar winning doesn't mean we (meaning the fans) have our football club back. It means someone else has it.
sheikh jassim supports unitedAlso, a reminder that, Qatar winning doesn't mean we (meaning the fans) have our football club back. It means someone else has it.
Your logic makes no sense.Also, a reminder that, Qatar winning doesn't mean we (meaning the fans) have our football club back. It means someone else has it.
Starts right about nowWhat time is the AGM?
That's Sheikh George Denis Bobby Eric Jassim to you.sheikh jassim supports united
A club like United could never be owned by the fans in this climate. Its impossible. If the richest man in Britain has been ran around for 8 months, that dream is dead and buried. You can see the appeal of getting a sugar daddy after 18 years in an abusive relationship, though.Also, a reminder that, Qatar winning doesn't mean we (meaning the fans) have our football club back. It means someone else has it.
What was ours worth with Team viewer?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Confident they've won is very different."Confident of winning" means nothing to me. Been hearing this type of message for months and nothing's happened. I'll believe it when it's announced and not before. Fully expecting we won't have heard any official new by this time next week. Hope I'm wrong but I don't think I am.
Around twice that, but Qatar was a sleeve sponsor for Bayern, not the main one.What was ours worth with Team viewer?
It would be a pretty epic thread if you did and photo documented your tripThe guys who wrote the bloomberg article are just the floor below mine. Might give them a visit
47m£.What was ours worth with Team viewer?