Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

fallengt

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
5,602
Jassim's bid was an extension of the Qatari government, the same government who is happily hosting and keeping safe Hamas leadership.
By that logic, Glazers funded Donald Trump & Us gov whom back Israel gov whom hitting on civilians at Gaza

Jebus, it must be tiresome to play this game
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,668
The Glazers are scum who have fecked this club beyond belief so yeah I’ll accept I was maybe a little harsh but the point stands, however we look at it his football clubs have been a failure.
You have no point let's be honest. There's about as much evidence that Jassim would lead us to glory as there is Ratcliffe.

The only thing we had for Jassim was clearance of debt.
 

Melville Red

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
985
Location
Arm chair or Pub
Is INEOS now the new shirt sponsor?

I wonder if Jasmin will now go and buy Everton? That will shut the red Scouse scum up, and will surely make us see what could have been.
 

RedRocket9908

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2023
Messages
2,378
Location
Manchester
Would surprise me that halfway through the negotiations with Ratcliffe the Glazers pull out.

What Ratcliffe wants will be impossible for the Glazers to give up ie control, especially for someone who had only invested 25%
The whole deal that SJR is rumoured to have agreed makes zero sence which is why I dont believe its true.

How can he have full control if he only owns 25%?

How can he pump in this alledged 4bn in if the Glazers still own a bigger share (44%) and could change their mind and decide to sell those shares to Shiekh Jassim or someone else?

What about the other investers who own a combined 31%, couldnt they form an alliance and use their 31% to over-rule SJR's decision or challange the legallity of him having control?

If he is paying £1.35bn for 25% and will likely want the price of any shares he purchases in the future to be pro-rata that means the price for 100% is £5.4bn which is less than Shiekh Jassim was offering so why would the Glazers agree to these terms?

Are the Glazers going to use some of the £1.35bn to pay off at least the debt they put on the club like how Liverpools owners paid off their clubs debt with the proceeds of a shares sale?
 

Luffy

Gomu Gomu
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
1,843
Location
Mauritius
There must be a poll about who is happy with the deal and who wanted the Qatari takeover. I will vote only if there is a 3rd, 'undecided' option.
 

astracrazy

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
1,335
I presume this in the end to refurbished or new stadium and training centre then?

Because surely SJR isn't going to invest into all that if he only owns 25%.
 

L1nk

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
5,098
The whole deal that Sir James Arthur Ratcliffe FIChemE is rumoured to have agreed makes zero sence which is why I dont believe its true.

How can he have full control if he only owns 25%?

How can he pump in this alledged 4bn in if the Glazers still own a bigger share (44%) and could change their mind and decide to sell those shares to Shiekh Jassim or someone else?

What about the other investers who own a combined 31%, couldnt they form an alliance and use their 31% to over-rule Sir James Arthur Ratcliffe FIChemE's decision or challange the legallity of him having control?

If he is paying £1.35bn for 25% and will likely want the price of any shares he purchases in the future to be pro-rata that means the price for 100% is £5.4bn which is less than Shiekh Jassim was offering so why would the Glazers agree to these terms?

Are the Glazers going to use some of the £1.35bn to pay off at least the debt they put on the club like how Liverpools owners paid off their clubs debt with the proceeds of a shares sale?
They will obviously sign a contract having all of it down in writing, you all seem to think they’ll do a deal for right now and then completely wing it after that.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,343
By that logic, Glazers funded Donald Trump & Us gov whom back Israel gov whom hitting on civilians at Gaza

Jebus, it must be tiresome to play this game
You shouldn't bother, he usually has the worst takes on most subjects here.
 

L1nk

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
5,098
I presume this in the end to refurbished or new stadium and training centre then?

Because surely Sir James Arthur Ratcliffe FIChemE isn't going to invest into all that if he only owns 25%.
He will because its the start of eventual full takeover
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,135
Location
Where the grass is greener.
Could be proven wrong but I don’t think we hear of this Jassim bloke again in terms of buying a team if he is indeed out of this process.

Of course judging by how football has gone for us over the last ten years, he’ll buy Liverpool now I’ve said that.
 
Last edited:

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,788
Location
india
They can’t even sell us properly. fecking parasites who always find a way to keep their grasp of the club and it’s drastic decline
 

Himannv

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Messages
5,811
Location
Somewhere in the draft forum
Aren't we already light years behind our rivals?
We’d be even further behind than before. You can bet there will be no improvements to facilities and the stadium and surrounding areas. That stuff becomes harder to do the longer you delay. That’s on top of all the delay that will happen due to not getting best in class in terms of players and staff for a number of years to come.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,135
Location
Where the grass is greener.
At least if they really do take over the footballing side of things we might see a bit of change? Maybe? I just want to believe that some good can come out of this, because on the surface I’m beyond underwhelmed by the prospect.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,217
Location
Hell on Earth
The whole deal that Sir James Arthur Ratcliffe FIChemE is rumoured to have agreed makes zero sence which is why I dont believe its true.

How can he have full control if he only owns 25%?

How can he pump in this alledged 4bn in if the Glazers still own a bigger share (44%) and could change their mind and decide to sell those shares to Shiekh Jassim or someone else?

What about the other investers who own a combined 31%, couldnt they form an alliance and use their 31% to over-rule Sir James Arthur Ratcliffe FIChemE's decision or challange the legallity of him having control?

If he is paying £1.35bn for 25% and will likely want the price of any shares he purchases in the future to be pro-rata that means the price for 100% is £5.4bn which is less than Shiekh Jassim was offering so why would the Glazers agree to these terms?

Are the Glazers going to use some of the £1.35bn to pay off at least the debt they put on the club like how Liverpools owners paid off their clubs debt with the proceeds of a shares sale?
Tbf its a very United thing that Ratcliffe is doing. We just never do things the simple or easy way!!
 

Acquire Me

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2006
Messages
8,401
Location
Norway
There must be a poll about who is happy with the deal and who wanted the Qatari takeover. I will vote only if there is a 3rd, 'undecided' option.
We really don’t need a poll to see that people are too emotional on the subject.
 

Wednesday at Stoke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
21,696
Location
Copenhagen
Supports
Time Travel
We’d be even further behind than before. You can bet there will be no improvements to facilities and the stadium and surrounding areas. That stuff becomes harder to do the longer you delay. That’s on top of all the delay that will happen due to not getting best in class in terms of players and staff for a number of years to come.
PIF turned Newcastle around from direr straits in the span of a season.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,217
Location
Hell on Earth
We’d be even further behind than before. You can bet there will be no improvements to facilities and the stadium and surrounding areas. That stuff becomes harder to do the longer you delay. That’s on top of all the delay that will happen due to not getting best in class in terms of players and staff for a number of years to come.
Charlie Savage was quoted to have said that they have better facilities at Reading FC!!

A League One club. :lol: :lol:
 

AFC NimbleThumb

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
8,363
Brexit Jim is the guy who uses his birthplace to tug the puppet strings of gullible people and xenophobes, big difference.

Same thing he did with INEOS - played on the ‘keep it British’, Brexit card, then got what he wanted and fecked all the idiots over that’d bought into his nonsense :lol:
What’s that saying, when somebody shows you who they are believe them. . .
 

AFC NimbleThumb

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
8,363
If rumors are true sporting decision's go to Ineos then that's a step up. Our problem was never spending. It was spending *BAD*
Nice signed Aaron Ramsey, Ross Barkley & Kasper Schmiechel in one window.

The absolute ludicrous way people are talking up Ineos despite living proof they can barely run a decent footballing operation themselves is bordering on corrupt. This 25% nonsense is putrid.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,319
By that logic, Glazers funded Donald Trump & Us gov whom back Israel gov whom hitting on civilians at Gaza

Jebus, it must be tiresome to play this game
If only the Glazers did have the backing of the US government!
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,217
Location
Hell on Earth
Jassim's bid was an extension of the Qatari government, the same government who is happily hosting and keeping safe Hamas leadership.

Cut the racism rubbish out.
Iranians are the ones behind Hamas. Not the Qataris. And besides, what's this bullshit of extensions? Is everyone in Qatar guilty of the acts of their gov't? Then every American is a war criminal by your extension for the illegal war in Iraq.

It's just bullocks what you said.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,613
Location
Manc
I've never been comfortable with a middle eastern bid tbh.

Jim might not be the saviour we all dreamed of on paper but if he has found a way to get the Glazers moving towards the exit door then well done to him.

All I want is that scum family to feck off, but it's not an easy task to get rid of those rats.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,063
It’s not a done deal yet but it’s looking incredibly likely now, which is incredibly depressing. I have supported United for decades, admittedly mostly through the good times but also when we were shit but if this deal goes through I’m done with United. Maybe I’ll check the final score here and there but I’ll move on to other things in life that will be much more with my time. Why? Because there will be no hope of proper title run under Gkazer/Ratcliffe control of the club. And if there’s no hope of a proper title run there’s really no point to any of this. A bad season or two is part of the ups and downs of any top club, but to be a perpetual laughingstock of false promises is unacceptable.

I’m in no position to tell anyone else what to do, but if there was mass revolt against this deal and the stadium emptied out I would be incredibly proud of the greatest supporters in any sport on the planet. It may take emptying the stadium out — no more purchasing of merchandise or anything else that feeds revenue to the club — to send the message to these jackasses who may hold the keys to the padlocks at OT but isn’t really their club. The club belongs to you heroes who have been there through it all at OT, not just when Cantona chipped the keeper but when City hammered us 1-6. In response to any of these assholes like Simon Jordan who defend the Glazers, of course they have the legal right to run the club into the ground, but we all have the right to call the Glazers out on what they have done to this club that millions around the world embraced as an important part of their lives.
 

redsunited

Full Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
838
Location
London
Worst run club. United became a club which gets into CL spots occasionally and it doesn’t look like changing in next decade or so. It is a matter of time City ground gets a ticker banner with number of years without United winning the league.
 

blackhawk747

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 6, 2013
Messages
129
Supports
Carrick FC
I wonder if the final offer of SJR will be offering a piece of the merge of Manchester United and INOES franchise to the Glazers in exchange for the remaining % class B stock. In term of business perspective, with INOES taking the shot as majority owner and taking care the sport side of things, and the Glazers will be providing the experience and connections of the commercial side, it will not only benefit the future multi football club group and also the others INOES sport franchise such as the F1 team and the cycling team. It could be a win-win situation for SJR and the Glazers, and also the Manchester United fans. If we see the INOES Sport as a whole, we don’t have to suffer the ridiculous management of the Glazers anymore. I think it’s a very creative merger solution if it pulls off.
 

Someone

Something
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
7,961
Location
Somewhere
I’m happy enough with the current compromise provided that there is a full buyout in ~3 years.

It might not be my first choice but it’s a step in the right direction. Many people acting like Ratcliffe is a naive idiot when he’s just got one over on a nation state. The guy obviously knows what he’s doing in business.

The true test will now come in how he rebuilds this club. I’m fairly content at the moment for a few reasons.

He has to do at least three things:

He simply has to address the debt and what his plans are for it.

He has to address his vision and plans for the future ( including the full buyout)

He has to address the stadium situation

Until he communicates with us his intention and what his actual plans are then it’s very difficult to have an objective view on this. I will remain cautiously optimistic about things until I hear what he’s going to say.
He isn't an idiot by his interest doesn't necessarily align with what's best for the club. He wanted to run the football side of the club and he's gonna get that, but as far as we're concerned it's like replacing Arnold with someone else.

The club needed someone who can clear the debt, and maybe invest in the stadium and training facilities. That's gone out of the window now, and the debt remains, so any hope of the club actually financing itself for the stadium is over because we can't possibly tolerate any more debt. Now I've seen people saying that investment will be made by Ratcliffe and I don't understand how can that be possible. It's just wishful thinking.

Ratcliffe probably thinks he can turn things around on the pitch if he's allowed to run the club, but the club needs more than that, and he couldn't care less as long as he gets his way. feck him really.
 

DuruttiColumn

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 25, 2020
Messages
96
Fair enough, we don’t need to be the plaything of some rich princeling and nobody involved in the process gives a toss about the fans.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,290
Why are multiple people referring to him as "Sir James Arthur Ratcliffe FIChemE"?

Obviously there's some context I'm missing to what I'm sure is a funny joke.
Apparently it autocorrects? I don't get it either....
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,343
Location
Salford
I might deluded but I think this all a smoke screen for Qatar to increase their bid.
I might be deluded too but I wondered that

The way the Glazers have handled this whole process I doubt they’ll care about broken assurances to Ineos. If Qatar come in with a higher bid per share I think they’ll still get it. Should know this week if our theory has any merit

I still personally think Ineos will get it, but I have a slight feeling Qatar may yet come back with a last gasp attempt now that they feel like it’s nearly gone
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,871
This is a daft post by Romano. If Jassim wanted the club that badly, he would have offered what was acceptable. You can't say "you will buy something at any cost" and then refuse to give the owner what they want.

I honestly believe if he had that amount and seriously offered that amount he would have got the deal done.

He didn't have the funds
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,962
Location
Austria
At least if they really do take over the footballing side of things we might see a bit of change? Maybe? I just want to believe that some good can come out of this, because on the surface I’m beyond underwhelmed by the prospect.
I just really hope Ratcliffe has learned some stuff from owning Nice. He's been underwhelming there but maybe he's learned his trait now. Changing Murthough and Arnold would be the first thing they have to do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.