No fecking way.
I don't think anybody would say players should just accept what they're given. Negotiation is fine. You can haggle over pay and still maintain a level of respect for the club and your manager. Rooney didn't do that. So the situations were not very similar.If you think Keane, Ferdinand etc didn't do very similar indeed, you're very naïve i'm afraid.
That's fine. My post wasn't directed at you then so no need to get upset over it.I don't hate him, he just isn't a club legend to me and I don't think he deserves a statue.
I know the complexity of people being able to feel anything other than love or hate in a situation might make your head explode but go with it anyway.
It's not just that year. Both times Rooney was United's top performer, going by the Matt Busby Player of the Year Awards, both ended with league cups. Not bad, but by United standards, hardly anything to write home about.Never understood this argument. How on earth could you criticise Rooney for us not winning that year?
In my opinion, it's a completely stupid arguement.It's not just that year. Both times Rooney was United's top performer, going by the Matt Busby Player of the Year Awards, both ended with league cups. Not bad, but by United standards, hardly anything to write home about.
Rooney was never a player you could build a team around, not a player who could be relied on to drag his team to the finish line, a là RvP or Cantona. He's also been uninspiring as a captain.
He was an outstanding and versatile player in his prime, been with us for a long time, scored some beautiful goals and broke the scoring record, and recognition for that is his reward.
I believe his transfer requests would have been forgiven if he was good enough, because fans are fickle, but off field antics aside he is still some way short of an all time great.
tl;dr: No, not worthy of a statue.
Not well liked amongst a minority of try-hard United fans. Guess you didn't hear the away end at Stoke? That's where our hardcore support reside.Absolutely not. Yes he has the record which will grant him legendary status, but he is not well liked with Utd fans due to his past behaviour holding the club to ransom.
He will never be beloved by the Utd fans the way Best, Charlton, Law, Ferguson were. Never
Not a criticism, just the fact that the year he was awesome was, unfortunately for him a forgettable year.Never understood this argument. How on earth could you criticise Rooney for us not winning that year?
Unfortunate, exactly.Not a criticism, just the fact that the year he was awesome was, unfortunately for him a forgettable year.
Don't get yourself wound up, it's just opinions.In my opinion, it's a completely stupid arguement.
That's the point. Cantona brought something more than goals and stats, he inspired the team and fans.He scored 34 goals in each of those seasons, more than Cantona ever scored (25 max), so it's not his fault that we didn't win the league in those years. We came very close in both years and it just so happens we fell short.
Berbatov played some awesome stuff and scored some fabulous goals. Legend?Also, in the 2010/11 season, Rooney didn't score a tally to write home about but he scored massive goals such as the City bicycle, West Ham away hat-trick and the penalty at Blackburn to win the league.
I didn't say he wasn't a 'legend'. And it is debatable and depends on your definition of the word.Statue is a matter of opinion but it's not even a debate about whether he's a legend or not. Just go on United's website and check.
If that City bicycle kick and West Ham away hat-trick isn't inspiration when we really needed it, I don't know what is.Don't get yourself wound up, it's just opinions.
That's the point. Cantona brought something more than goals and stats, he inspired the team and fans.
Berbatov played some awesome stuff and scored some fabulous goals. Legend?
I didn't say he wasn't a 'legend'. And it is debatable and depends on your definition of the word.
Keane was a huge fuss at the time, that was 50k a week was huge money.I don't think anybody would say players should just accept what they're given. Negotiation is fine. You can haggle over pay and still maintain a level of respect for the club and your manager. Rooney didn't do that. So the situations were not very similar.
Hence so many not wanting a statue.
I'd say Keane was the one to look at. He'd have been out of contract, so didn't need to put a transfer request in.Keane got what he deserved proportionately. The club was printing money back then and were low balling him and I don't ever recall him being "Angry and Confused" at the club during his negotiation and subsequently submitting a formal transfer request.
Ferdinand you have a point on but I don't see a clamour for him to have a statue so I don't see what he has to do with it.
Fact is Rooney fleeced us when we were in a vulnerable position firstly then spat the dummy when we brought in Kagawa and van Persie and then he was eventually dopped.
And the answer would be the highest ever goalscorer for this club and country, records that will take incredible efforts to ever matchThere is about six players ahead in the queue for a statue.
Can only imagine how hilarious this statue would look. Some kid in the distant future is going to look at that statue and say, "who is the ogre man daddy?"
But that was the reality of the situation. Keane said he wanted a pay rise, United said no, negotiations went not and the deal was sorted. Even though it had everybody worried there was an honesty, Keane was upfront about what he wanted. He never dressed up his desire for a better deal as anything else.Keane was a huge fuss at the time, that was 50k a week was huge money.
He'd clearly met with all the rival clubs, and there were plenty of stories and quotes from him about how he might well go unless he got his money.
Got about as close as you can get without officially putting a transfer request in.
The obvious difference of course was that he'd have been a free agent, so didn't need to.
Rush played over a hundred games more but it's still some record.But Rooney did play in mid for many games, which I doubt Rush did, so not really fair to compare.
Shanks.Yeah Newcastle have a Shearer statue, Arsenal Henry, Bolton Lofthouse, Everton Dixie Dean and i think Wolves have a Bull statue might be others.
So it seems to be a thing, in that case i think it would be fair enough for Rooney to get one eventually if the club wants to.
Agreed. Over-rated and never a main man but he is a legend now that he has our goalscoring record. The latter in itself is not enough to warrant a statue.It's not just that year. Both times Rooney was United's top performer, going by the Matt Busby Player of the Year Awards, both ended with league cups. Not bad, but by United standards, hardly anything to write home about.
Rooney was never a player you could build a team around, not a player who could be relied on to drag his team to the finish line, a là RvP or Cantona. He's also been uninspiring as a captain.
He was an outstanding and versatile player in his prime, been with us for a long time, scored some beautiful goals and broke the scoring record, and recognition for that is his reward.
I believe his transfer requests would have been forgiven if he was good enough, because fans are fickle, but off field antics aside he is still some way short of an all time great.
tl;dr: No, not worthy of a statue.
You do know that the questioning the clubs signings and the transfer request etc was in the summer?But that was the reality of the situation. Keane said he wanted a pay rise, United said no, negotiations went not and the deal was sorted. Even though it had everybody worried there was an honesty, Keane was upfront about what he wanted. He never dressed up his desire for a better deal as anything else.
Contrast that with a player questioning the ambition of the club and manager then almost immediately signing a new deal.
You can see the difference right?
It was a sorry episode for Wayne because it portrayed him as a money man who had dropped his grievance the minute his salary was raised. Thats the way it was presented, but i don't think it was Wayne's intention to make it a financial issue.
We were talking about clubs giving their top scorers statues though mate.Shanks.