g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
cant he join us and just buy a replica Madrid shirt?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
cant he join us and just buy a replica Madrid shirt?
There we go.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That's the main thing, I'd have liked Camavinga here but if he's got a Real Madrid boner then no point, but we need a quality midfielder, it's bad enough that one of McFred starts most games next season, nevermind both.i certainly hope Ole has an alternate CM in mind if this starts to go badly and all indications point to waiting a year so he can join madrid on a free
If there isn't there should be!To the Tchouameni thread then. If…there ever was one.
Just checked, he's indeed liked it.Stay with us muppets.
He liked the Sancho announcement last week and the Sancho/Rashford video earlier today too. Patience muppets.Just checked, he's indeed liked it.
that's simply an oversimplification and generalization, you can't just jump into conclusions with that kind of speculationThat policy is BS. First of all; Real and Barca will always be no1 choice for nearly all players.
And look at City or Chelsea. You think that their players really really really wanted to play for them and only for them? If you want a player, you fight for him.
Was just going to post this.Stay with us muppets.
I have a small glimmer of hope that he's using Real Madrid to make us hurry up and sign him. Would be glorious
We do if he puts in 3-4 good years then brings in a £100m+ fee.Well feck him if true, we don't need a player who's dreaming on moving to Madrid.
We're Spurs?We do if he puts in 3-4 good years then brings in a £100m+ fee.
more likely to just leave us on a free like PogbaWe do if he puts in 3-4 good years then brings in a £100m+ fee.
No but if we get 4 years out of a player then sell for a decent profit there’s no harm in that. Ideally he’d stay for 10 years but that’s not the modern game and rarely happens.We're Spurs?
Yes, I think United fans have been a bit spoiled by having a few one club and long term players. We need to get used to a cycle where some players only stay a few years. It's ok for that to happen.No but if we get 4 years out of a player then sell for a decent profit there’s no harm in that. Ideally he’d stay for 10 years but that’s not the modern game and rarely happens.
More like a Rice alternative, if you want a player like him.Has anyone seen this Kamara kid from Marseille?
Could he be an alternative to Camavinga?
'Only god knows'If the kid wants to pull a Cristiano Ronaldo move I’m perfectly fine with that.
Different type of player, more like Rice.Has anyone seen this Kamara kid from Marseille?
Could he be an alternative to Camavinga?
I agree. 5 years of Haaland and Camavinga for less than £60 million and selling them on for the guts of £200 million or being in a strong position to keep either is what I’d call good management.Yes, I think United fans have been a bit spoiled by having a few one club and long term players. We need to get used to a cycle where some players only stay a few years. It's ok for that to happen.
That's a bit churlish, we did exactly the same thing with Ronaldo.We're Spurs?
We bought him in anticipation of selling him off for a profit?That's a bit churlish, we did exactly the same thing with Ronaldo.