Elon Musk | Owner of X

Bebe

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
5,581
Location
The true north.
The world's already an absurd comedy, I can't see how this makes anything worse in particular. Much funnier though, which is always appreciated.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
The world's already an absurd comedy, I can't see how this makes anything worse in particular. Much funnier though, which is always appreciated.
You don't see how it will make things worse when Trump and all his QAnon cult followers are allowed to resume the Twitter amplification of their lies?
 
Joined
Sep 23, 2017
Messages
2,298
Peakest example of Feck You Money the world has seen. Throwing down $45bn to own the libs.

Best case scenario: Everyone abandons the platform, no viable replacement pops up. World gets a little better and Elon loses a fat chunk.

Likely scenario: Same cesspool with a few new/returning characters added.
 

Halftrack

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
3,953
Location
Chair
So he could be buying it to effectively buy a future president and get whatever he wants.

Or he could be buying it to try and genuinely revolutionise social media as he has said, which means combatting its main problem - Its massive boatloads of disinformation and use as a political manipulation tool for the far/alt-right. If he has some idea how to do that.

I've always got the impression he leans toward saving the world rather than destroying it so one can hope huh.
On the other hand, he practically begs for the attention and admiration of internet edgelords, he's a covidiot, he's anti-union, anti-workers' rights, he runs workplaces that are unsafe and rife with racism, he's pro "free speech" (the kind where no one is allowed to dunk on, make fun of or get mad at you for your opinions.)

I don't think there's much hope of him making Twitter better.
 

Rhyme Animal

Thinks Di Zerbi is better than Pep.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
11,193
Location
Nonchalantly scoring the winner...
On the other hand, he practically begs for the attention and admiration of internet edgelords, he's a covidiot, he's anti-union, anti-workers' rights, he runs workplaces that are unsafe and rife with racism, he's pro "free speech" (the kind where no one is allowed to dunk on, make fun of or get mad at you for your opinions.)

I don't think there's much hope of him making Twitter better.
This. He’s an alt-right icon ffs.
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,723
Location
The Zone
Meh it might mean the end of twitter which really wouldn't be a bad thing although it is one of the better social media sites(People do tend to overestimate the impact it has on politics and facebook is far bigger shite show anyways).
 
Last edited:

WPMUFC

Full Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
9,665
Location
Australia
40 billion so he gets to control the narrative about himself and all his ventures.

Absolutely wild. Probably work out to be very cheap when he crushes all dissent that he doesn't like.
 

Simbo

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
5,234
Its not going to the be the end of Twitter ffs, as fun as it would be to see it, he's not investing this sort of cash for it to die, he's not that daft.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,073
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Genuinely terrible news for democracy this.
That’s my instinct too. I’m absolutely convinced that the FB algorithms which used outrage to drive engagement have directly caused the worst political polarisation in our lifetimes (ever?) I’m not sure if Twitter content has been tweaked to the same extent but with a shady prick like this in charge that’s surely inevitable.
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,080
Location
?
He paid 40 billion for Twitter? Doesn’t he know it’s free on the App Store?
 

ZIDANE

Full Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
7,540
Location
Manchester
Supports
The Philosophy.
I'm not sure it will change all that much, there will be new features that make the platform better and it's really been under-developed for many years and wasn't growing - Jack (founder) spoke out about the board in a limited manner recently.

In terms of free speech, Elon made it clear that the line will be difficult to judge in the TED talks but there is a clear line around breaking the law in that country.

And Elon isn't going to be reviewing individual tweets, he said the algorithm should be open source so the world can see how it works and with open-source you often get the world feeding back on it.

He still has to find half the money or sell Tesla shares, I suspect he will look around for someone else or a group to partner with and run it. He's got Tesla, Boring, and SpaceX to run.

Given the rise of Tik Tok and demise of FB (in terms of growth) it feels like there was starting to become a void.
 

Frosty

Logical and sensible but turns women gay
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
17,281
Location
Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango!
That’s my instinct too. I’m absolutely convinced that the FB algorithms which used outrage to drive engagement have directly caused the worst political polarisation in our lifetimes (ever?) I’m not sure if Twitter content has been tweaked to the same extent but with a shady prick like this in charge that’s surely inevitable.
The UK Government's Online Safety Bill wants to clamp down (in a very ineffective way) on fake news and disinformation. But now Twitter is in private hands I genuinely don't see Musk bending to any Government demands from the UK, US or elsewhere.

Instead we will get more and more Trumps who instead of clamping down on disinformation simply pander to Musk to get an audience.

And to think the main concern of the UK Government in relation to elections at the moment is to make it harder for people to vote...
 

bucky

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
9,599
Its not going to the be the end of Twitter ffs, as fun as it would be to see it, he's not investing this sort of cash for it to die, he's not that daft.
I mean you just have to look at tumblr. If idiots are in charge, it can go downhill quickly.
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,723
Location
The Zone
The UK Government's Online Safety Bill wants to clamp down (in a very ineffective way) on fake news and disinformation. But now Twitter is in private hands I genuinely don't see Musk bending to any Government demands from the UK, US or elsewhere.

Instead we will get more and more Trumps who instead of clamping down on disinformation simply pander to Musk to get an audience.

And to think the main concern of the UK Government in relation to elections at the moment is to make it harder for people to vote...
Still mental that they did this in the last election.

 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end

:eek: He's not wrong...
I doubt it. China will continue to ban Twitter and continue to use their own social media platforms domestically. They have no reason to strong arm Musk for influence over Twitter. It's not like they need it when they have already Weibo. They'll save up that influence for something more meaningful in the long run.
 

Sir Matt

Blue Devil
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
18,327
Location
LUHG
I doubt it. China will continue to ban Twitter and continue to use their own social media platforms domestically. They have no reason to strong arm Musk for influence over Twitter. It's not like they need it when they have already Weibo. They'll save up that influence for something more meaningful in the long run.
Yet they dedicate resources to bot farms and spreading Chinese propaganda via Twitter. If anyone with a decent following on Twitter tweets about the Uighur genocide, they get hounded by Chinese astroturf accounts. They also track dissidents and try to use Twitter to unmask domestic critics using it. If Musk decides to force everyone to provide identification documents as part of his "verifying" all humans, the Chinese will inevitably hack Twitter (or buy some insider off like the Saudis did) and use that information to persecute people in and out of China. Musk would be unable to enact any response without risking Tesla's business there.
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
Yet they dedicate resources to bot farms and spreading Chinese propaganda via Twitter. If anyone with a decent following on Twitter tweets about the Uighur genocide, they get hounded by Chinese astroturf accounts. They also track dissidents and try to use Twitter to unmask domestic critics using it. If Musk decides to force everyone to provide identification documents as part of his "verifying" all humans, the Chinese will inevitably hack Twitter (or buy some insider off like the Saudis did) and use that information to persecute people in and out of China. Musk would be unable to enact any response without risking Tesla's business there.
Fair points.

I think, on balance, ID Verification will do more good than harm. But I hadn't considered your side of it. And it's not like Twitter is a 'nice' place even now.
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,942
I don't think it's really about all the free speech stuff at all, he's a bit of an arsehole with the stuff he comes out with, but at it's core he's a capitalist and that's what this purchase will be about. There's tonnes of value in Twitter that could be unlocked with the right features and UI changes.

I hope he messes it up though because his legion of arse lickers are insufferable as it is.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,750
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
I don't think it's really about all the free speech stuff at all, he's a bit of an arsehole with the stuff he comes out with, but at it's core he's a capitalist and that's what this purchase will be about. There's tonnes of value in Twitter that could be unlocked with the right features and UI changes.

I hope he messes it up though because his legion of arse lickers are insufferable as it is.
No need to personally attack @Revan like that.