I do not get it!
Who's an obvious candidate though?
They might be waiting for a +ve result in the FA cup to make it more palatable. I.e. if they indeed plan to go with him.
In the Arsenal match? The two biggest issues that everyone has repeated over and over ever since preseason weren't there in that match. The team was more compact with a smaller gap between the attackers and the defenders, and the third midfielder (Mainoo) was playing more as a normal #8 instead of acting as a #10 like they have been in almost every other game this season.
We don’t want to announce a new contract amidst all the poor results. We will wait until FA Cup final - if we win, or even lose after a decent enough performance (like 2-0, 3-1 loss) they will us momentum created by that to push the announcement through. Probably a 3-year extension.
Losing the cup final 3-1 really would give us incredible momentum.
Obvious candidate = Pep or Klopp.
Would really be the ignition for a summer of sheer positivity
It really is this now, isn't it? I have to watch, but don't actually want to.That awful feeling of realising Utd are on tonight.
What great fun that will be
And yet he keeps firing his managers at Salford every few months, me thinks Nev is full of cow doodoo.
Maybe it works for Salford City
Capello was almost 46 when he won his 1st trophy as Milan manager. De Zerbri is still only 44 and has had to work his way up the football ladder.
There's many, many options out there that aren't Ten Hag. It's been two years and we've gotten progressively worse, there will be no corner turning, just brief up ticks in form surrounded by random batterings.
No one gets the players they want! You think Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool etc all didn't want Kane in the summer? Do you hear them complaining? How many teams wanted Bellingham and didn't get him? How many teams will want Mbappe? You can't always get the players you want so you have to get the best out of the players you have or the players you get instead. Ten Hag can sit in an interview and bemoan the fact he wanted Kane and De Jong but they aren't valid excuses. I'm sure Fergie wanted Zidane, Del Piero, Thuram, Ronaldo etc back in the day, he didn't get them but he managed to do alright with O'Shea, Blomqvist and Greening etc.
That's one hell of a long game though, don't you think? This has been rumbling on for months, way before we even got to the FA Cup Final. They've had a couple of results like the Liverpool one where they could have took the opportunity.
Because they were all crap or past it Garry. Now shut up.
And was the team more compact on account of following instructions, or because the ‚tactics‘ were different?
That actually shows that this tactical adjustment could have been made anytime earlier. But no. He had to go with the best transition team in the world nonsense until he meets a team he knows we would concede in double figures. It was not impossible and maybe we would even have suffered fewer injuries. So why was he so stubborn?
FYI it takes more energy to stay compact than to leave gaps.
What do people mean by this? What is/was "obvious" about Ten Hag?
and thats decent!
So are you saying that EtH deliberately left gaps because we were not fit enough? Interesting take. The helter skelter chasing back when we lose the ball looks quite tiring as well to be honest.
People need to let go of this idea that INEOS will be making decisions, they are not the Glazers.
Yeah if we lose that game by less than 3 goals it will be considered a good result by most I think. Just like our loss to Arsenal was considered an impressive performance.
So you think that the players just suddenly decided to play a completely different way in preseason all on their own, going against what ETH wanted? That we signed Mount with the intention of playing him deeper than he ever had before, that McTominay just decided to start pushing much further forward than he ever has before, that Eriksen decided to push further forward than he did last season, that Mainoo (when he isn't playing as the DM) plays higher up the pitch than our players in a similar position last season did?
Scoring a goal against City and losing by just two goals will definitely be considered a good result by ETH and his crowd. Probably also by United people in power.
Mate, do you not get a bit bored of this routine? You've been doing it for so many months
But I’m being serious here. It’s a largely popular opinion that last weekend’s result and performance against Arsenal were good, we lost that game 1-0 having almost no shots on their goal. Why would a 3-1 loss to a better team be considered bad by the same people who are now applauding that performance?Mate, do you not get a bit bored of this routine? You've been doing it for so many months
He didn't get FDJ who didn't want to come here and Harry Kane who wasn't allowed to come here. Apart from that he got his players, the first season actually scuppered the second season because he was so insistant on getting certain players we overpaid for them.
We are actually playing a higher line than last season, although still fairly deep.
Even if the the gaps are a result of being gassed and confused from tactics based on speedy transitions and pace?
Clearly not. Their still in league 2Maybe it works for Salford City
It is normal to get stretched when attacking directly in numbers, it is very demanding tactically and physically on the players.
