Benching players can work as long as you can win the games.
Hojlund seems to be an instant hit with the fans and we know Garnacho is popular. If we play those two, we could bench Rashford without a revolt, don’t you think?
Then it would be a matter of how Rashford responds. I am not sure if you were suggesting we should sell him? He is a player we might get a few quid for.
All these players have their unique strengths that are all beneficial to the team when needed but it should be a matter of usage at the appropriate time, not forcing the team to conform to things that are detrimental to our play at specific times.
Rashford is a brilliant player and we should never sell him but I don’t like his untouchable status and he is not the only one. Especially when it’s quite visible he lacks certain tools that are required for the bedrock of ETH football.
Plus he is a wide player, they have inconsistent general game play, so to constantly play or keep them on the pitch when the FB has their number is a suicidal practice. Yet fans/pundits will always tell us he is the only one capable of scoring in our team, meaning we’d rather have him stinking up the place than try something different.
The most inconsistent players in our team don’t have direct competition for their starting positions. Our manager is too busy making them feel comfortable instead of keeping them on edge. We all see what happens with Shaw when he feels his position is under threat.
Garnacho and Hojlund are both very raw in my opinion and a situation that will require a lot of patience from fans. I also think Garnacho is a Rashford clone with more trickery and it doesn’t fill me with optimism if I’m being honest, though he is likelier to whip a cross in.