I think this it the wrong way of looking at it. I do agree that playing more conservatively would have resulted in better results so far this season. That's how we played for much of last season and it certainly covers up the shortcomings in a few of our players and gives us an extra degree of cover. However I also think the ceiling for that type of football is far lower.
If our aim is to become compete toe to toe with any team in world football - which may seem a long way away this season but surely is the goal - then at some point we need to transition to a more pro-active, attacking and, frankly, risk taking form of football. If that means taking a step backwards before we take a few forwards, then that's fine.
Obviously our problem is that we've taken several steps backwards this season, not just one, which is why I'm not against being more conservative for a while. But I think conservative football won't win us the league again. Its more a question of when we take that step, not whether.
Yeh all very fair. I would disagree that a 4231 in defence and attack is “defensive” by definition, but there is clearly a reason that a lot of teams are trying to play this “Pep” system .
However, we look terrible playing it. Which can only be because of a few reasons:
1. Too much change too quickly
2. Poor coaching
3. It doesn’t suit the strengths of the players.
It’s likely a combination of all three, but my biggest concern is point 3. For me, it highlights a lot of our best players weaknesses (Bruno sloppy possession when covering deep, Rashford too wide, Casemiro overrun, Shaw too narrow), whilst taking away all of their best qualities.
I just don’t think we have the squad for the system… it would need ripping up and starting from scratch.
So until that is a reality, play to your strengths.