That was a great goal from Diogo Jota
Europa League / Conference League 23/24
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) was joined by comedian Ali Woods to look back at the best and worst moments of a rollercoaster season with the annual United Hour Awards.
Has Ten Hag been sacked yet? We're not sure and we hope not, but it's looking more likely as the days pass.
Who should replace him and why is it taking so long to make a decision?
Ffs, Liverpool will get something from this won’t they.
They just won’t die.
They just won’t die.
This is the difference between city/liverpool and united. Even when they are poor they always keep themselves in the game. They'll probably get a draw now
United if we where 3 1 down at this stage, your not expecting us to pull it back.
United if we where 3 1 down at this stage, your not expecting us to pull it back.
Yep
You just fecking knew it.
Of COURSE
Hand ball in the build up
I swear their luck is the opposite of ours
feck off
This ref doesn’t have a fecking clue.
HAHAHAHA
Come on VAR
Do what you do best
Do what you do best
Hahahahajhahaha
Go on rule it out
McManaman can't deal with it 
McMananaman is making this all the sweeter
I’d be livid if that was against us. Just shows how absolute dogshit VAR is.
Sure it would be ruled out if it was us so good to see them finally suffer too usually it goes their way
Looooool!!!!!!
This is hilarious!!
This is hilarious!!
I thought the rule was only for the goalscorer?
His tears are delicious!
The good thing is they would have been pissing themselves laughing at us yesterday, so have some of that!
Good about time those cnuts had a bad rub of it again.
Of course Gurner is screaming at the referees
I don’t think the “only the goal scorer” rule makes any sense, if you’re going to blatantly cheat like McAllister just did then it shouldn’t matter if he’s the one who scored it or not.
That's literally how there rules are now though. It's a stupid rule but...
They was laughing at us last night. Now they get the same…
Looked like a ref that was desperate to give the goal for Liverpool.
A sending off ignored, OG gets them back into the game and thought they had scored equaliser in the 9th minute of added time would be typical lucky Liverpool had that happen.
In the grand scheme of things it matters nothing as Liverpool will top that group and will likely go on to win that trophy in Dublin
I know mate, I’m just saying I think the rule is dumb.
Oh absolutely it is.
Dunno wether to watch the West Ham game or villa…
Don't think VAR can disallow that, no?
This is exactly why I ain't getting a ticket for the final even if I do regret not going in 2011. (Not often a European final is on your doorstep regardless of the peformance that ended up being played out). No way I'm going to watch those cnuts win a trophy and be surrouhded bt thousands of them as well.
Sincerely hope this doesn't end up with a West Ham Liverpool final. 2 sets of belllend supporters in the city next summer belugh
Not 100% but if Toulouse player heads it away (by choice… he could have hoofed it, controlled it), is it not a new phase of play?
So rules now take into account whether hit body first, where on arm, how long before, distance from ball to arm, whether new phase and intent…..
I think the rules are just a tad too complicated. Combined with officials being sh!te.
Obviously caveated by it wasn’t us and it was Liverpool so hey…
So rules now take into account whether hit body first, where on arm, how long before, distance from ball to arm, whether new phase and intent…..
I think the rules are just a tad too complicated. Combined with officials being sh!te.
Obviously caveated by it wasn’t us and it was Liverpool so hey…
Hoping Oly will do us a favour and kick Wet Spam for 90min ahead of Sunday. There’s a couple of Forest players on the bench - do your duty lads.
Lenglet gives Villa the lead. Goal disallowed for offside.
Danilo gives Rangers the lead.
It's harsh to go all the way back for something the ref missed but Mac did seem to handball it. He kind of judged the ball wrong and the ball rolled up his chest and onto his upper arm. It's still hard to say whether he used his arm intentionally because the initial contact is with his body. I don't know how you can be sure it's an intentional handball unless you're being strongly influenced by players yelling, holding their heads in mock disbelief, and furiously gesticulating 'handball' with their arms.
I mean how far back can you actually go to re-ref some minor infraction in the lead up to a goal anyway.
It's massively unfortunate and it's getting a bit tedious for everyone.
I mean how far back can you actually go to re-ref some minor infraction in the lead up to a goal anyway.
It's massively unfortunate and it's getting a bit tedious for everyone.
Last edited: