Leg-End
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2004
- Messages
- 19,554
So dumb from Mercedes, bizzare thinking. Same from Ferrari, why not pit one!
No idea but I will enjoy the memes after they finish P3 and P5Why are Ferrari not pitting?
It's bizarre, with Le Clerc they may have been worried he comes out behind Sainz but he's down on power anyway so he would have been a sitting duck. I don't get it at all.what are all these guys doing not putting. Le Clerc, Sainz and Hamilton? Madness. Absolute clueless strategy.
Can’t pit now. Opportunity was missed.Why are Ferrari not pitting?
Perez, you meanIt's bizarre, with Le Clerc they may have been worried he comes out behind Sainz but he's down on power anyway so he would have been a sitting duck. I don't get it at all.
They would lose track position, not worth the risk.what are all these guys doing not putting. Le Clerc, Sainz and Hamilton? Madness. Absolute clueless strategy.
How is he supposed to know if he should pit? He doesn’t know where everyone is behind him. He should have been pulled in instantly on softs. Mercedes feck up as per.Hamilton moans when engineers tell him what to do then moans again when they let him make the choice
Sorry, yepPerez, you mean
you sound just as clueless as the Merc engineersHamilton moans when engineers tell him what to do then moans again when they let him make the choice
You mean Perez and he wouldn’t have because Perez pitted, unless you mean Perez wouldn’t have pitted if Le Clerc did? If that’s the case I wouldn’t be worried at all because Le Clerc would have passed him easily.It's bizarre, with Le Clerc they may have been worried he comes out behind Sainz but he's down on power anyway so he would have been a sitting duck. I don't get it at all.
thats what the strategists are for, is it not.Hamilton moans when engineers tell him what to do then moans again when they let him make the choice
If Leclerc had pitted, then I'm sure Perez wouldn't have done, but yeah he would have passed him easily. It's just a weird decision and I don't get the downside for Leclerc pitting in that situation.You mean Perez and he wouldn’t have because Perez pitted, unless you mean Perez wouldn’t have pitted if Le Clerc did? If that’s the case I wouldn’t be worried at all because Le Clerc would have passed him easily.
No, Le Clerc at worst would drop behind Perez but only if Perez didn’t pit. And if Sainz didn’t pit he would have moved out of Le Clerc’s way. So that would at worst leave Le Clerc on fresh softs behind two red bulls on old hard tyres. So this is wrong.They would lose track position, not worth the risk.
Even the laps behind the SC are on par with the rest of the racethe SC has made the last 10 or so laps more intresting.
There isn’t any downside. Really bonehead move. Honestly I don’t think any team has any sane people devising strategy except Red Bull.If LeClerc had pitted, then I'm sure Perez wouldn't have done, but yeah he would have passed him easily. It's just a weird decision and I don't get the downside for Le Clerc pitting in that situation.
It’s the right call, the Ferrari is in no way superior to Red Bull today so being behind Perez is a dumb move on a circuit that is difficult to overtake.No, Le Clerc at worst would drop behind Perez but only if Perez didn’t pit. And if Sainz didn’t pit he would have moved out of Le Clerc’s way. So that would at worst leave Le Clerc on fresh softs behind two red bulls on old hard tyres. So this is wrong.
Hamilton I’m less sure of where he would end up but judging by where Russell came out, he wouldn’t have most any.
I hope by mental you mean ridiculousthat fake Marina is just fecking mental
this is just wrong. Sorry but totally rubbish.It’s the right call, the Ferrari is in no way superior to Red Bull today so being behind Perez is a dumb move on a circuit that is difficult to overtake.
Hamilton would have come out between Schumacher or Ocon.
oh yes , that just what I mean, who thought that was a good ideaI hope by mental you mean ridiculous