yadda yadda yadda. I've covered every point you've raised, so what do you keep bringing up the same?
You have no facts to back up your opinion. It's all straw man and false equivalence, which suggests you either just hate Mourinho or are a Woodward shill. Thats your prerogative. And also fine.
But until you produce some facts that prove your hyperbole, it will simply remain as your opinion.
Fact: Mourinho had spent more than any manager except Pep Guardiola in his first two summers at Manchester United.
Fact: Mourinho said at the start of 2017/18 that the squad is equipped for fighting for the title.
Fact: Despite this, Mourinho was already bemoaning squad quality by the middle of his second season, shitting on the club after a highly disappointing Champions League defeat in which he left our best outfield player on the bench.
Fact: Mourinho's most successful season, at every single club he ever managed, was either his first or second. His third season, was always the worst, without exception.
Fact: When Klopp caught up to Mourinho's spending, he actually put up a real challenge to Manchester City and won the Champions League. All this despite starting off with an inferior squad compared to Mourinho's.
Fact: Most of the signings made during Mourinho's tenure didn't work out for one reason or another. Bailly is an unreliable, rash sicknote; Mkhitaryan turned out to be simply not good enough; Matic had a couple of good months and then the same steady decline that had been already apparent at Chelsea; Lukaku started well but remained incredibly streaky and inconsistent, his poor technique restricted him, and he was used as a target man despite being blatantly unsuitable; Sánchez didn't contribute anything; Fred barely looks like a footballer; the jury is very much out on both Dalot and Lindelöf.
Conclusion: the level of resources Mourinho was afforded were sufficient for better performance, as Klopp's example shows. His third season was unlikely to be better than the previous two, as his entire managerial career as well as his transfer record shows; the level of spending - again, as much as title-challenging, CL-winning Liverpool - certainly doesn't explain the absolutely disastrous form of the first half of 2018/19.
Of course you can claim that the transfer record is Woodward's fault but that's just speculation I'm afraid, not one of those "facts" you seem to love so much. So even if we just completely disregard transfers, the rest of the facts really look bad for Mourinho.