g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Jadon Sancho image 25

Jadon Sancho England flag

2022-23 Performances


View full 2022-23 profile

5.3 Season Average Rating
Appearances
41
Goals
7
Assists
3
Yellow cards
0
Status
Not open for further replies.

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
20,241
Location
England
How did our scouts not realise how slow and weak he is? He is never going to cut it as a wide attacker in the PL. It's not like he has David SIlva/Mata levels of technical ability either.
In general how have they failed to spot the slowness of Maguire and Sancho. Or that AWB isn’t technically good enough. These glaring flaws should have been picked up on.
 

Red Star One

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
5,290
Location
Barcelona
How did our scouts not realise how slow and weak he is? He is never going to cut it as a wide attacker in the PL. It's not like he has David SIlva/Mata levels of technical ability either.
I'm afraid it's low-key nepotism and not so high standards in terms of expectations from staff members. Neither Ole nor many others having a say in our transfer dealings were really recruited on merit. Transfer-making back then was never professional enough and levels below other top teams.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,312
Location
...
Goals: He's better than 75% of the wide attackers in the league
Assists: He's better than 54%
Expected assists: 58%
Shot Creating Actions: 86%
Take ons: 71%
Progressive passes, carries and passes received: 70%
Pass completion: 95%
Passes attempted(Hideability): 75%

It wouldn't have to be that big a jump.
Here we go.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,312
Location
...
How did our scouts not realise how slow and weak he is? He is never going to cut it as a wide attacker in the PL. It's not like he has David SIlva/Mata levels of technical ability either.
Probably didn’t scout at all, just read ‘94% take ons’ or something to that effect.

I really wanted us to sign Sancho for years but as time went on, it was starting to become clear that there were question marks and sadly, those questions have been answered emphatically so far. Get rid.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,677
Location
The rainbow's end
Back in the summer of 2021, my thought was that both City and United went for the wrong player. Sancho looked a much better fit for Pep's pass and move tactics, starting from a wide position to link up with others, get in good positions in the half-spaces and use his nimble skills to carve an opening. Whereas Grealish, who likes to get on the ball and work it out on the spur of the moment, on the other hand, seemed like the player Solskjaer needed whenever the quick route from Bruno to Rashford wasn't on. I won't say that Graelish has set the world alight at the Etihad, but he's found a role in this City team. I'm not going to defend Sancho, either, as he's been a disappointment for us. But he's continuing to fail in a side which still cries out for sheer individualism to get the job done. Just out of curiosity... let's say that City put 20 million on the table and the prospect to get his 350 grand p/w off our wage bill, would you give him to Pep?
 

dpansheth

Full Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
1,086
Back in the summer of 2021, my thought was that both City and United went for the wrong player. Sancho looked a much better fit for Pep's pass and move tactics, starting from a wide position to link up with others, get in good positions in the half-spaces and use his nimble skills to carve an opening. Whereas Grealish, who likes to get on the ball and work it out on the spur of the moment, on the other hand, seemed like the player Solskjaer needed whenever the quick route from Bruno to Rashford wasn't on. I won't say that Graelish has set the world alight at the Etihad, but he's found a role in this City team. I'm not going to defend Sancho, either, as he's been a disappointment for us. But he's continuing to fail in a side which still cries out for sheer individualism to get the job done. Just out of curiosity... let's say that City put 20 million on the table and the prospect to get his 350 grand p/w off our wage bill, would you give him to Pep?
never been to UK or manchester, but i'll make the trip & drive him to City myself.
 

No Idea For Nickname

Patroness Saint of the anti-RAWKites
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
19,799
Location
Split, Croatia
let's say that City put 20 million on the table and the prospect to get his 350 grand p/w off our wage bill, would you give him to Pep?
No. Would ask at least 35-40m. English, homegrown, marketable... They can afford it, they have the money. F... them.
But Pep would not want him back, he wasn't crying when he left. Maybe he saw somwthing we are seeing now.
 

NotQuiteManc

Full Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
1,928
I guess Bundesliga worked well for him because PL seems to be more intense, more physical, and perhaps too fast for him.
 

TsuWave

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
14,392
Pep would not want him back, he wasn't crying when he left. Maybe he saw somwthing we are seeing now.
Sancho hasn't worked out here, but Pep has let plenty of good players go previously. I don't think that's the litmus test/corroboration you're presenting it as
 

Swedish_Plumber

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2021
Messages
5,134
Location
Edinburgh
He'd do well at West Ham. Maybe we could swap Moyes for Sancho?
I reckon with a bit more time, moyes could get us right up for it in the conference league. Would love Jagielka as an assistant for helping Martinez adjust to the physicality of the league too.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,677
Location
The rainbow's end
never been to UK or manchester, but i'll make the trip & drive him to City myself.
Fair enough, i guess. That's the honest view to have, if you don't rate a player at all. And we've shot our selves in the foot several times in the past with our "protect the value" policy.


No. Would ask at least 35-40m. English, homegrown, marketable... They can afford it, they have the money. F... them.
But Pep would not want him back, he wasn't crying when he left. Maybe he saw somwthing we are seeing now.
It's a hypothetical, obviously it's not going to happen. But if people don't rate him at all, why not, at least, get him off the books? If WHU, for example, inquire about Maguire and are willing to cover a chunk of his wages on the premise that they'll not pay a transfer fee - and Maguire agrees - i would be more than glad to let him go. I presume most fans on here would feel the same. Thus, the question. Is Sancho as irredeemable as the likes of Maguire?

As for Pep, he's an elite manager whose system guarantees success. There are very few in each generation. This can simplify things for the owner, DOF, CEO etc., the same way Ferguson used to make everyone's job easier at United by assuming full responsibility for the comings and goings. They basically strengthened their main rivals for the title this season, that's close to ridiculous. Trust in the system allows you to do that. Fergie did it with Pogba when our best option behind the 35+ Scholes/Giggs was Tom fecking Cleverley.

But we don't have that atm. And it's clear as daylight that - with his own weaknesses as player included - he is not a good match for a team that has only one gear in it. Do you let him go to a team designed to pass its way into the opposition box (City, Arsenal even) and double down on your existing team strengths by replacing him with another player or do you try to add another dimension to your overall game by giving him something to work with on the pitch?
 

pratyush_utd

Can't tell DeGea and Onana apart.
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Messages
8,440
If Sancho was getting stuck in and working hard on and off the ball( like Antony), his lack of form would be tolerable. But to see him stroll around and contribute feck all, it feels like his time is up if he cant change this by the end of season. ETH may not give him more leeway. He has already been shown way too much patience than most players get
 

Valencia's Left Foot

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
562
Supports
Austin FC, USMNT, Three Lions
This guy simply doesn't have the mental toughness or physicality/speed to make it for a top tier EPL team. I haven't even seen a glimpse of what was promised coming over from Dortmund. If the Qataris take over, I hope that we cut our losses with him and bring in someone more dynamic.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,592

He has no heart
This kinda left my mind. I remember him turning his back and ducking down on a shot. I can't find the video but here's the pic.


I'm not sure which is worse
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,192
Location
Canada
Goals: He's better than 75% of the wide attackers in the league
Assists: He's better than 54%
Expected assists: 58%
Shot Creating Actions: 86%
Take ons: 71%
Progressive passes, carries and passes received: 70%
Pass completion: 95%
Passes attempted(Hideability): 75%

It wouldn't have to be that big a jump.
This is the wrong way to use percentiles.... or at least, reading the data.

A club like United ultimately needs players who are in the 90th percentile for the key stats for their roles. For Sancho, that is things like progressive passing, progressive carries, shot creation, expected assists. Bruno for example, 97th/98th/99th percentile for many creation stats, low to mid 90s for plenty of others. Clear quality player. Rashford in the 90's for shooting/being a goal threat from wide. Licha in the 80's and 90s for plenty of defensive, passing and possession statistics.

Being a 75th percentile attacker is being not good enough for a top club, who needs the 90th percentile players.

To add - Garnacho is an elite youngster, and it shows in the stats. 80th percentile in shooting stats already, mid to high 90's in terms of progressive carries, carries into the attacking third, into the box, take ons, touches in the box, etc. He looks like an elite 18 year old in the stats, but in the stats you can also see he is raw in some ways and that tends to be rounded over time. But He is doing it in the prem from 18. Sancho had those elite numbers in the Bundesliga... but hasn't done it for United, and I do think mentally he isn't brave enough or confident enough to handle those expectations.
 
Last edited:

RedDevilQuebecois

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,256
He was the shining example for English players moving abroad to the wonderful Dortmund first then taking the next step but maybe it shows that it’s not the perfect way. There are question marks about that league and he still plays like a youth team player.
With the way that German teams capitulated in front of English teams in Europe (Dortmund even threw it away against Chelsea, FFS!), we have a serious case about how that league turning into a joke that teaches vanilla football rather than preparing minnows for manhood. Right now I would rate the Ligue 1 and even Serie A ahead of the Bundesliga if I'm seeking players who can survive the demands of the Prem.

He is a massive pussy. Let's just call it for what it is. Timid, tepid, no heart, whatever. He has no appetite for the physical side of the game. Weak mentality. Ponderous on the ball. Weak dribbler. Worse signing than Sanchez in my eyes. Cannot see any way back for him. If some team is willing to pay £40M this summer, then sell.
This. I was telling that to a local football pundit from Montreal (he's also a red) as we watched the game, and he agrees that Sancho embodies all the jokes and tropes we used to dish on footballers from continental Europe not cutting it in the Prem.
 

Peelhead

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Messages
96
never been to UK or manchester, but i'll make the trip & drive him to City myself.
Ha! Brilliant strategy from the Visit Manchester tourism authority, how to get millions of people over to crowd fund a player sale and transport.

I have to laugh or I'd cry. I've seen some transfers just go wrong but I think this is the worst I've seen in 40 years of watching.

I think he'll need to go because negativity can really start affecting the team morale.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,923
Location
England
How did our scouts not realise how slow and weak he is? He is never going to cut it as a wide attacker in the PL. It's not like he has David SIlva/Mata levels of technical ability either.
Our scouts recommended the young developmental signing Amad Diallo and Solskjaer/Phelan went with Sancho. And when the Sancho deal fell through in 2020 (due to cost), Woodward then turned to the recommendation of the scouts and John Murtough did the deal for Amad, due to Murtough being the head of youth development and a youngster like Amad falling under his remit.This was briefly discussed on a podcast that discuss structural issues surrounding top level football clubs.

Our scouts also told Woodward not to sign Harry Maguire in 2018, when Mourinho wanted him. And the scouts conclusion was that Maguire wasn't any better than the CBs that United already had at the club. A year later, Woodward ignores the scouts and signs Maguire for Solskjaer and Phelan, with Phelan being Maguire's former manager at Hull City. And this was reported by Daniel Taylor who was then working for the Guardian.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
He's had far less good games for us than even likes of Maguire has had. Scary how bad he's become.

Will probably go out on loan next season at the very most. Nobody is going to offer him a way out with a permanent deal.

We really have to stop giving out these ridiculous contracts to players that don't deserve it.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,201
Our scouts recommended the young developmental signing Amad Diallo and Solskjaer/Phelan went with Sancho. And when the Sancho deal fell through in 2020 (due to cost), Woodward then turned to the recommendation of the scouts and John Murtough did the deal for Amad, due to Murtough being the head of youth development and a youngster like Amad falling under his remit.This was briefly discussed on a podcast that discuss structural issues surrounding top level football clubs.

Our scouts also told Woodward not to sign Harry Maguire in 2018, when Mourinho wanted him. And the scouts conclusion was that Maguire wasn't any better than the CBs that United already had at the club. A year later, Woodward ignores the scouts and signs Maguire for Solskjaer and Phelan, with Phelan being Maguire's former manager at Hull City. And this was reported by Daniel Taylor who was then working for the Guardian.
Ole and Phelan were both football dinosaurs. Damning stuff that.

Many on here were so happy Phelan was brought back, but I thought it was nonsensical he was.
 

Andersons Dietician

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
13,295
It’s getting hard to defend him, Mentally went in the first 5 minutes. In some ways feel sorry for him because hes shown signs of frustration at himself in previous games but he kept going and trying. Sometimes when you’re in a slump of bad form it just seems relentless and you over think the simplest of things and it just snowballls in to every aspect of your game. Looks bereft of confidence and honestly ETH probably has to pull him or let him play through hoping he finds confidence and form somewhere.

The issue with Thursday was in the first 5-10 minutes some things didn’t come off for him, poor first touch and so on and he just gave up and retreated in to his shell. Not sure how you come back from that or if anything can be done at this point.
 

Olecurls99

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
2,168
This is the wrong way to use percentiles.... or at least, reading the data.

A club like United ultimately needs players who are in the 90th percentile for the key stats for their roles. For Sancho, that is things like progressive passing, progressive carries, shot creation, expected assists. Bruno for example, 97th/98th/99th percentile for many creation stats, low to mid 90s for plenty of others. Clear quality player. Rashford in the 90's for shooting/being a goal threat from wide. Licha in the 80's and 90s for plenty of defensive, passing and possession statistics.

Being a 75th percentile attacker is being not good enough for a top club, who needs the 90th percentile players.

To add - Garnacho is an elite youngster, and it shows in the stats. 80th percentile in shooting stats already, mid to high 90's in terms of progressive carries, carries into the attacking third, into the box, take ons, touches in the box, etc. He looks like an elite 18 year old in the stats, but in the stats you can also see he is raw in some ways and that tends to be rounded over time. But He is doing it in the prem from 18. Sancho had those elite numbers in the Bundesliga... but hasn't done it for United, and I do think mentally he isn't brave enough or confident enough to handle those expectations.
We're in agreement there. I was just showing his stats aren't as bad as people would think.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
I am getting more and more convinced that Sancho isn't the right fit in this league.

His stats is as bad as Sanchez at United, who was a big flop. But at least Sanchez works lots harder than Sancho. And his performance is quite meh for most of his time here.

Perhaps we should try to offer Dortmund 70m plus Sancho for Bellingham?
 

Olecurls99

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
2,168
I am getting more and more convinced that Sancho isn't the right fit in this league.

His stats is as bad as Sanchez at United, who was a big flop. But at least Sanchez works lots harder than Sancho. And his performance is quite meh for most of his time here.

Perhaps we should try to offer Dortmund 70m plus Sancho for Bellingham?
Sigh
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,588
I am getting more and more convinced that Sancho isn't the right fit in this league.

His stats is as bad as Sanchez at United, who was a big flop. But at least Sanchez works lots harder than Sancho. And his performance is quite meh for most of his time here.

Perhaps we should try to offer Dortmund 70m plus Sancho for Bellingham?
What makes you think Bellingham would work out?
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,588
Our scouts recommended the young developmental signing Amad Diallo and Solskjaer/Phelan went with Sancho. And when the Sancho deal fell through in 2020 (due to cost), Woodward then turned to the recommendation of the scouts and John Murtough did the deal for Amad, due to Murtough being the head of youth development and a youngster like Amad falling under his remit.This was briefly discussed on a podcast that discuss structural issues surrounding top level football clubs.

Our scouts also told Woodward not to sign Harry Maguire in 2018, when Mourinho wanted him. And the scouts conclusion was that Maguire wasn't any better than the CBs that United already had at the club. A year later, Woodward ignores the scouts and signs Maguire for Solskjaer and Phelan, with Phelan being Maguire's former manager at Hull City. And this was reported by Daniel Taylor who was then working for the Guardian.
Nothing has really changed at United then because Im pretty sure Ten Hag over ruled the scouts plenty this summer
 

Doracle

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,046
What makes you think Bellingham would work out?
I suppose we can at least see that Bellingham has looked impressive for England, which was perhaps the one real red flag in respect of Sancho, so perhaps more suited for top level football?
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
He hasn’t had a single 90 min good performance.

He just performs for an occasional 4 mins in an occasional match & sometimes it can win us the match.

It’s why I know he won’t work - Antony has at least performed for a good 70 mins in a game, so he can improve on that to build some consistency.

Sancho is a nothing player for most of the game.

I will always blame the fan base that wanted him for his signing and his hype.

Only because this fan base have ago at much better players themselves and act like they never make mistakes ever.
 

Doracle

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,046
He hasn’t had a single 90 min good performance.

He just performs for an occasional 4 mins in an occasional match & sometimes it can win us the match.

It’s why I know he won’t work - Antony has at least performed for a good 70 mins in a game, so he can improve on that to build some consistency.

Sancho is a nothing player for most of the game.

I will always blame the fan base that wanted him for his signing and his hype.

Only because this fan base have ago at much better players themselves and act like they never make mistakes ever.
I wanted us to sign Sancho, as we needed a RW, and he was excellent in that position for Dortmund, playing a very similar style to the role I’d expect of him at United.

Now, it’s utterly frustrating for me that we seem to have spent two seasons more or less playing him anywhere but RW. That’s the role he was needed for and where his skillset is most useful. However, I acknowledge that, even on the rare occasion when we have played him there, he hasn’t been any better.

Part of it seems to be that he doesn’t have as much pace/acceleration as I thought but mostly it seems to be a lack of confidence/drive. I still have not completely given up hope but it’s hard to see what can fix him, given the efforts made this season don’t seem to have helped.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,923
Location
England
Nothing has really changed at United then because Im pretty sure Ten Hag over ruled the scouts plenty this summer
He hasn't over-ruled anyone but has infact been working with the scouts like Mayorga and Wells who have replaced Bout and Lawlor. But there was reports that ten Hag wanted Ziyech but was over-ruled by the scouts. And there's also been reports that ten Hag has informed the heads of scouting to assess the likes of Timber and Kudus, which didn't happen under Mourinho or Solskjaer who relied on their personal scouts. Big difference.
 

Drizzle

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
1,350
I was angry at him at the start of the match when we had a promising turnover and a dangerous attacking situation and he released the ball too hastily and messed it up. Clearly panicked about the situation and couldn't handle the pressure. Elite teams have killers in those situations.

The lad is done. He's miles behind Rashford and Garnacho on the left, and Antony on the right. Doesn't have the balls or workrate to play more centrally. How we manage his exit will be key now, because it won't be easy to get rid of him. But we must.

He hasn’t had a single 90 min good performance.

He just performs for an occasional 4 mins in an occasional match & sometimes it can win us the match.
That's the truth of it. Not one single match with a consistent good performance. Not one.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,388
Don't recall a player at United as soft as Sancho. His complete lack of impact at International level should have been a warning sign in retrospect.
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,664
For £ spent per good performance so far he must be one of our worst signings of all time. People here wanted to spend £120m on him!
I said this in October, nothing has changed.

It actually goes under the radar how bad a signing he's been while other players get all the attention.
 

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
14,121
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.
Our scouts recommended the young developmental signing Amad Diallo and Solskjaer/Phelan went with Sancho. And when the Sancho deal fell through in 2020 (due to cost), Woodward then turned to the recommendation of the scouts and John Murtough did the deal for Amad, due to Murtough being the head of youth development and a youngster like Amad falling under his remit.This was briefly discussed on a podcast that discuss structural issues surrounding top level football clubs.
We wanted Sancho the summer he went to Dortmund so I’d be truly fascinated to see from what evidence you’ve deduced he wasn’t recommended by the scouts and that instead they suggested Amad to be the starting right winger to go straight into the first team 3 years ago.
 

Bondi77

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
7,405
I am getting more and more convinced that Sancho isn't the right fit in this league.

His stats is as bad as Sanchez at United, who was a big flop. But at least Sanchez works lots harder than Sancho. And his performance is quite meh for most of his time here.

Perhaps we should try to offer Dortmund 70m plus Sancho for Bellingham?
And put Jude on Sancho's wages :lol: :lol:
Fecking hell!!!
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,923
Location
England
We wanted Sancho the summer he went to Dortmund so I’d be truly fascinated to see from what evidence you’ve deduced he wasn’t recommended by the scouts and that instead they suggested Amad to be the starting right winger to go straight into the first team 3 years ago.
Solskjaer had a personal scout along with Mike Phelan as his adviser who he worked with independently from the club's scouts when it came to recruitment, which is well documented, and both Solskjaer and Phelan were seen several times at football stadiums scouting players. Solskjaer even went on record and said that it took 5 scouts to veto him for a deal to fall through. At other clubs the opinion of just the head of recruitment is enough.

Yes we did try to sign Sancho from City when he was 17 before he left for Dortmund. But that was a Sancho who was valued at considerably less than the player that developed into a first team player at Dortmund.

And I never said the scouts recommended Amad to be a starting 11 player straight away and I quite clearly described him as a player who was recommended as a developmental type signing for the RW. And if Solskjaer had even attempted to try and develop Amad for the inverted RW role, rather than sign another left sided attacker, we would've saved a considerable amount of money.
 

Mercurial

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
2,380
Not setting the league on fire yet. We should not repeat mistakes of old by handing out contracts like this going forward. Doubt he would freely walk away from a weekly fortune anytime soon to save his career. Besides, who would carry that salary and pay a high transfer fee on top? It's bad business and were stuck to it. Best hope is he can better himself or that we cut loose on a cheap if club sees no path forward.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.