LawCharltonBest
Enjoys watching fox porn
I agree on the principle that United sign 2 starter DM/CMsI think he should stay on loan there for another season.
Otherwise he has to stay because another season of McFred will make me very angry
I agree on the principle that United sign 2 starter DM/CMsI think he should stay on loan there for another season.
and that shows how much he knowsHe called him Gardner.
Tuanzebe was our 3rd choice CB when he came back but could never get off the treatment table. Shit comparison.Nah, no it isn't.
Villa asked for Tuanzebe back on loan after promoted, we said no, the rest is history and he's warmed the Napoli bench after not getting a look in at Villa as he hasn't developed.
If Forest come in for Garner on loan next season, we should be letting him stay there, he's nowhere near good enough for us anyway at this point in time.
Yeah, fewer progressive passes than Joe 'sideways' Allen.Think those that claim he has a great passing range and is a progressive passer of the ball are kidding themselves. I get it, we've all done it, but Garner is pretty average.
Too slowSome posters on would criticize Busquets' passing if he was from the United academy....
Loan him back. Don’t just sell a top young player because other young players have failed before him.Should cash in while his value is up as I would guess Nottinham will want to keep him. Unfortunately we are not smart enough to do that so will keep him in our first team squad until his value reaches 0.
Yeah not really. I do believe a manager and a treble winner have the capability to rate a player better than most caftards.and that shows how much he knows
He can’t even get his name rightYeah not really. I do believe a manager and a treble winner have the capability to rate a player better than most caftards.
The name thing was all me, I just didn't want to let the virgin spelling nazi get more ammunition.He can’t even get his name right
Too slow
Liverpool sold Rhian Brewster for £20M. We should be selling the likes of him and Henderson and reinvesting in the squad.He is a more talented player than McTominay and Fred, but he's still not good enough to be a first choice Manchester United player. We need to stop being sentimental and lowering our standards.
Hopefully Forest buy him, it would be a great move for the lad.
Haha, fvcking hell fella, he’s levels above McHiding so I’m seriously bemused as to whether you actually understand footballHe looks like a below par McTominay. Not seen much that makes me that excited.
Let's be honest, the odds that he will make it here and be an important player for us are very slim. Selling (ideally with some sort of buy back clause) while their value is on the high is a much safer option.Loan him back. Don’t just sell a top young player because other young players have failed before him.
£50m buyback?! That's more than fecking Fred cost and he was massively overpriced.I like Garner but from a cold, hard business perspective, this would be a great time to sell him.
Id say he's a good player for his age but right now, he's nowhere near the level required to challenge for top three in the PL
Ask Forest for £25m and put a £50m buyback clause in. That gives him the best chance to play weekly in the PL and develop to his max. potential and we get instant cash to inject into the squad
Apart from perhaps looking like him from a distance, he's nothing like him.He's very similar to Carrick, who never looked as he took a game by the scruff of the neck, he just quietly controlled the game. I thin with the right partner ( in a double pivot for example) he could make it here. I would certainly like to see him given a chance
so is GarnerApart from perhaps looking like him from a distance, he's nothing like him.
The Carrick comparison is a bit lazy just because he's a midfielder that passes sideways. Carrick passed sideways and backwards a lot, but was very progressive when he needed to be. Carrick was also very good defensively.
Garner has nothing on Carras aside from a general comparison. Carrick didn't start out as a DLP who screened the defense. He stayed in midfield, but was able to adapt to the base of midfield like Scholes did.so is Garner
Not from what I've seen.so is Garner
Then you haven't been watching closely enough, he has an excellent range of passing and has great vision and regularly plays line breaking passes.Not from what I've seen.
Yeah, I think what's more likely is people telling themselves what they want to see. Time will tell.Then you haven't been watching closely enough, he has an excellent range of passing and has great vision and regularly plays line breaking passes.
I've watched him lots of times over the last 2 seasons, I'm not telling myself anything, I'm telling you.Yeah, I think what's more likely is people telling themselves what they want to see. Time will tell.