Jose Mourinho | 2017/18 Assessments | Poll Added

Your stance


  • Total voters
    1,563
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

JK-27

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
869
We just can't seem to play consistent football for 90 mins. We are constantly starting games too slowly and by the time we realise we need to put in some effort, it's normally too late.

I can see why City won the league, but if we are so inconsistent and yet are still 2nd in the league then Liverpool, Spurs, and Chelsea must be really shite.
 

RonaldoVII

Full Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
24,270
Location
PSN:FrozenInHell
Was he hoping the fringe players would do better tonight? It's not often they all come together and play well when the team is changed so much. He needs to get rid of 5/6 players in the summer and freshen the squad up whilst adding a couple of quality additions.
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,263
Location
Manchester
We can't fecking start a game. What is he doing before the match? Probably mumbling at everyone.
 

RORY65

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
4,565
Needs to stop covering for the Glazers, second place and a FA cup with this team is overachieving. A 150 million budget on 2-3 players wont cut it.

Needs a massive window, our club can't carry that many mediocre or below average players season after season. Fullbacks needs to be a priority.
Covering for the Glazers? He's spent £300 million and thrown massive wages at the likes of Ibrahimovic, Pogba and Sanchez and he's chosen to prioritise big money signings rather than several signings (he also clearly doesn't see full back as an important position in a team). The reality is with the money and our budget, we should be closer to City than the rest of the top 6 are to us so to suggest he's overachieving is bonkers. He's doing par in terms of results but the way they're being achieved leaves a lot to be desired.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,100
We just can't seem to play consistent football for 90 mins. We are constantly starting games too slowly and by the time we realise we need to put in some effort, it's normally too late.

I can see why City won the league, but if we are so inconsistent and yet are still 2nd in the league then Liverpool, Spurs, and Chelsea must be really shite.
The big red flag for me is that players seem to be picking and choosing their games. We've beaten all the top sides but lost to all the newly promoted ones as well.

Suggests they're playing for the occasion and not the manager.
 

Thiim

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 9, 2012
Messages
1,264
Location
Offside (by the length of a toe)
He will not be at the club at the end of next season. It's pretty much guaranteed the way things are shaping up right now. Then we'll appoint some tired old wanker and try to aim for fourth again.

When was the last game we played well? When was the last game we played some enjoyable football for more than 30minutes during one half? It soesn't happen anymore.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,100
Covering for the Glazers? He's spent £300 million and thrown massive wages at the likes of Ibrahimovic, Pogba and Sanchez and he's chosen to prioritise big money signings rather than several signings (he also clearly doesn't see full back as an important position in a team). The reality is with the money and our budget, we should be closer to City than the rest of the top 6 are to us so to suggest he's overachieving is bonkers. He's doing par in terms of results but the way they're being achieved leaves a lot to be desired.
Agree with everything said here. Good post
 

goin4glory

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
5,033
Location
Crushing Souls.
Started with a line up the muppets would dream of, Martial/Rashford/Mata and got exactly what the realists expected. None of them are good enough to be starters.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
Conceding 4, scoring 1 and losing all games away against the promoted teams. Not to mention results like 0-0 v Southampton, 0-1 to West Brom or 2-2 v Stoke. That's 16 points dropped against teams struggling in the relegation fight, the same number of points between us and City right now.

Jose seriously needs to sort this out. It's all well and good winning against the top teams but dropping 16 points to these teams is an absolute joke.
This is the keynote to our season.

I hope somebody mentions this to Jose, this is NOT good enough.
 

Jacko21

Full Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
4,584
Location
Manchester
He will not be at the club at the end of next season. It's pretty much guaranteed the way things are shaping up right now. Then we'll appoint some tired old wanker and try to aim for fourth again.

When was the last game we played well? When was the last game we played some enjoyable football for more than 30minutes during one half? It soesn't happen anymore.
He will.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,129
He will not be at the club at the end of next season. It's pretty much guaranteed the way things are shaping up right now. Then we'll appoint some tired old wanker and try to aim for fourth again.

When was the last game we played well? When was the last game we played some enjoyable football for more than 30minutes during one half? It soesn't happen anymore.
Unfortunately he will. We had to give him a new contract to shut him up sadly.
 

Donnie Brasco

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Messages
202
Location
Mulberry Street
Covering for the Glazers? He's spent £300 million and thrown massive wages at the likes of Ibrahimovic, Pogba and Sanchez and he's chosen to prioritise big money signings rather than several signings (he also clearly doesn't see full back as an important position in a team). The reality is with the money and our budget, we should be closer to City than the rest of the top 6 are to us so to suggest he's overachieving is bonkers. He's doing par in terms of results but the way they're being achieved leaves a lot to be desired.
Peanuts in todays market. We didn't have a senior striker, no world class players besides De Gea. Our best players are those he brought in. I would trust him with another 300 million.
The manager of the world richest clubs with the highest income shouldn't have too prioritise signings, we are not Tottenham.
City had 4-5 players that were way better than anything we had.

He took over a complete shite team, the worse United team I remember in the last 30 years.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,129
Peanuts in todays market. We didn't have a senior striker, no world class players besides De Gea. Our best players are those he brought in. I would trust him with another 300 million.
The manager of the world richest clubs with the highest income shouldn't have too prioritise signings, we are not Tottenham.
City had 4-5 players that were way better than anything we had.

He took over a complete shite team, the worse United team I remember in the last 30 years.
Van Gaal must've been a miracle worker then.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,154
Location
Canada
Can't wait for the day he leaves tbh. He'll keep us in respectable positions in the table but we'll be awful to watch until the day he leaves. Then we can hope again.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,475
Basically said that’s why these lot don’t play every week now stfu asking about Rashford and Martial.
 

RORY65

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
4,565
Peanuts in todays market. We didn't have a senior striker, no world class players besides De Gea. Our best players are those he brought in. I would trust him with another 300 million.
The manager of the world richest clubs with the highest income shouldn't have too prioritise signings, we are not Tottenham.
City had 4-5 players that were way better than anything we had.

He took over a complete shite team, the worse United team I remember in the last 30 years.
Peanuts? Barring PSG and City it's a level of spending that barely any club in Europe can match. Bayern's record all-time signing cost less than half what both Pogba and Lukaku cost. When has he had to prioritise signings? In his first two summers he said he wanted 8 players, he got 7 and then got Sanchez in in January. The reality is City did have a better squad to begin with and have spent more and hired a better manager. I have no issue with us being 2nd to them but given that our resources and squad are much greater than everyone but them, we shouldn't be playing such unattractive football with them setting the record for the biggest gap ever between 1st and 2nd.

I don't think his job should be under threat at all but your claim that he's overachieving is just wrong, we should be 2nd, we are 2nd but the football is dross and one of the few virtues we had when he took over, a couple of exciting attackers, haven't improved due to him not coaching attacking play and wanting ready made solutions that he doesn't have to take any responsibility for developing.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,100
Fair point. But in reshaping the squad Fergie got rid of ageing players (Strachan), boozy crocks (Whiteside and McGrath) and players who simply weren't good enough (Davenport, O'Brien). There was a lot of fat to cut.

Look at the squad Mourinho has. He's got Pogba (world's most expensive player last year), Martial and Rashford (golden boy and runner-up), Sánchez (one of best players in PL for last four years) and Lukaku (signed for 75 million last summer). Who is Mourinho going to get that's markedly better than those players? What is the point of shipping out those young, obviously talented players, particularly given Mourinho might not be here for the long-term?
 

Dinghy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
2,499
Don't know what the hell he sees in players like Fellaini, Darmian, Mata and Young.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
Nervous at the thought of letting the guy begging Fellaini to stay to rebuild the team in his image.

Anyway I'm sure he only picked today's team because there was nothing to lose. we had three palm trees in midfield and the slowest least dynamic combination on the right. And I thought Valencia wad bad. He at least makes himself available as an outlet when Mata roams
 

Minimalist

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
15,091
Peanuts? Barring PSG and City it's a level of spending that barely any club in Europe can match. Bayern's record all-time signing cost less than half what both Pogba and Lukaku cost. When has he had to prioritise signings? In his first two summers he said he wanted 8 players, he got 7 and then got Sanchez in in January. The reality is City did have a better squad to begin with and have spent more and hired a better manager. I have no issue with us being 2nd to them but given that our resources and squad are much greater than everyone but them, we shouldn't be playing such unattractive football with them setting the record for the biggest gap ever between 1st and 2nd.

I don't think his job should be under threat at all but your claim that he's overachieving is just wrong, we should be 2nd, we are 2nd but the football is dross and one of the few virtues we had when he took over, a couple of exciting attackers, haven't improved due to him not coaching attacking play and wanting ready made solutions that he doesn't have to take any responsibility for developing.
Anyone saying United have spent peanuts since Ferguson retired (or even since Mourinho came in) is in deep need of medication.

We're incredibly low value for money. I'd pull up the numbers but they're not flattering.
 

Walters_19_MuFc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
29,680
Location
Birmingham
He chats so much nonsense, at times.

He's just said that the players that replaced the others tonight didn't perform (which is true) and that's why the others always play. Clearly referring to Lukaku and Sanchez, but then how many shite performances have we seen from them two?

Sanchez was awful for 3/4 games in a row and not once was he dropped.

It's also always hard for a player who is constantly on the bench to just come in and perform. In the words of Van Gaal, you need match rhythm.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,154
Location
Canada
Peanuts in todays market. We didn't have a senior striker, no world class players besides De Gea. Our best players are those he brought in. I would trust him with another 300 million.
The manager of the world richest clubs with the highest income shouldn't have too prioritise signings, we are not Tottenham.
City had 4-5 players that were way better than anything we had.

He took over a complete shite team, the worse United team I remember in the last 30 years.
You would trust him with another 300 million? Which one of his signings has come off? Also all this talk about "only 300m" (crazy), but ignoring that we also signed Sanchez and Ibra on free transfers, so you can pretty much add on another 80m-100m to that in terms of value.
  • Bailly 30m - always injured
  • Ibra on a free - Never going to be more then a stop gap for one year as it turned out
  • Mkhitaryan 25m - Did alright in the Europa League but trash other then that until we gave him away for a player with 6 months left on their contract
  • Pogba 90m - Mourinho drops him for the most important games of the season against Sevilla. Says it all.
  • Lukaku 75m - He's done pretty well but he's never a 75m player and not at the top level of strikers. But decent enough sure.
  • Matic 45m - He's a good player, but out POTS last year was Herrera. Matic essentially just replaced him from the 11, so you can't say it was an amazing signing.
  • Lindelof 30m - Nothing more than a squad player
  • Sanchez on a free - Hasn't performed any better then Rashford or Martial have overall this season. Was borderline world class last season
So what's that, a few marginal successes but no clear "very good signing"? Along with not really improving anyone in our side compared to before. We obviously need to support him in the transfer window just like any manager, but to say I'd trust him to change anything would be pushing it.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,100
Ah brilliant! So we're dropping to mid-table next season?

Can't wait.

EDIT: In all seriousness, the Ferguson comparisons can't fcuk right off. He's nothing like Ferguson.
Indeed. He's not fit to lick the great man's boots.
 

exit35

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
20
Fair point. But in reshaping the squad Fergie got rid of ageing players (Strachan), boozy crocks (Whiteside and McGrath) and players who simply weren't good enough (Davenport, O'Brien). There was a lot of fat to cut.

Look at the squad Mourinho has. He's got Pogba (world's most expensive player last year), Martial and Rashford (golden boy and runner-up), Sánchez (one of best players in PL for last four years) and Lukaku (signed for 75 million last summer). Who is Mourinho going to get that's markedly better than those players? What is the point of shipping out those young, obviously talented players, particularly given Mourinho might not be here for the long-term?
Really? You left out all of the bang average players we have.

Two quality fullbacks, a quality midfielder to replace fellaini and a proper right winger to replace Mata would go some way to raising the quality on the pitch and in doing so could raise the performance of others.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
He chats so much nonsense, at times.

He's just said that the players that replaced the others tonight didn't perform (which is true) and that's why the others always play. Clearly referring to Lukaku and Sanchez, but then how many shite performances have we seen from them two?

Sanchez was awful for 3/4 games in a row and not once was he dropped.

It's also always hard for a player who is constantly on the bench to just come in and perform. In the words of Van Gaal, you need match rhythm.
Some of his favs also had stinkers tonight. No need for a manager to single anyone out. We lost a similar game a few weeks back with our first teamers
 

Oldyella

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
5,913
Wouldn't be at all surprised if he suffers another mutiny at United. The fact that players are picking and choosing their games doesn't bode well for him.
Not even sure they are picking and choosing. We tend to lose the games we are expected to win, simply as we dont know how to attack when teams sit deep against us.

Aside from signing better players, I see no indication he is working on our attacking play at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.