10 minutes stoppage time.
Anyone watching able to confirm that’s fair?
10 minutes stoppage time.
It is 10 min
Anyone watching able to confirm that’s fair?
Literally said it in a group chat about ten mins ago that they’d get ten mins added.10 minutes stoppage time.
A lot of game would justify this much added time but it's never applied.Total 18 minutes of added time.
Not even hiding it anymore.
Liverpool are possibly the only club in England that get this treatment.10mins extra time. Seems like whole world is trying to force liverpool into top 4. How come we never get this type of benefits? I do admit during SAF time we do get a bit of that but not to this extent.
What actually happened in both halves for this to happen? Was there even a long break in play?Total 18 minutes of added time.
Not even hiding it anymore.
Yes that is what I don't understand. What was the reason that they get these treatment. Was it because most of the people with decision making power are liverpool supporters?Liverpool are possibly the only club in England that get this treatment.
All I can think of is that Villa were doing some of the worst time wasting I've seen, from very early in the half.Apart from the Mings studs up challenge, I can’t remember any major stoppage. I was watching both games.
Villa were shithousing but no worse than I see in most games.All I can think of is that Villa were doing some of the worst time wasting I've seen, from very early in the half.
But 10 minutes was ludicrous.
Klopp's shithousery definitely helps. Refs are human after all - surely they're influenced (even if subtly) by narratives in the media, press conferences, etc.Yes that is what I don't understand. What was the reason that they get these treatment. Was it because most of the people with decision making power are liverpool supporters?
I've asked on various forums and Reddit, and absolutely nobody has been able to explain why the ref decided to add about 500% more time than average for a PL game. Someone murmured something about timewasting, but it would be plain impossible to waste that much time without getting sent off. Couple of injuries but none severe, one penalty, one VAR overturn, and two goals should not come out to more than like 5-6 minutes at the most.Please tell me this added time on both halves is justified. It's getting silly now.
We saw that a few years back when he started bawling about how many penalties we were getting (at that point, we'd gotten one more than them, by the way) and then we suddenly didn't get a single pen for the next eight months or so, despite numerous utter stonewallers that the refs just opted to deny us.Klopp's shithousery definitely helps. Refs are human after all - surely they're influenced (even if subtly) by narratives in the media, press conferences, etc.
He’s not, but Haaland doesn’t play for Chelsea so it’s completely irrelevant. You can only judge Chelsea relative to their best players, so of course Nkunku being missing is going to make it easier for a Liverpool,Nkunku is hardly Haaland is he? I doubt it will have much impact on the result.
I don't think so. Jackson might start and score a bagful. Chelsea are at home and they should be getting a result against Liverpool with or without their new striker.He’s not, but Haaland doesn’t play for Chelsea so it’s completely irrelevant. You can only judge Chelsea relative to their best players, so of course Nkunku being missing is going to make it easier for a Liverpool,
The same Chelsea that finished in the bottom half of the table last season?I don't think so. Jackson might start and score a bagful. Chelsea are at home and they should be getting a result against Liverpool with or without their new striker.
They've since spent god knows how much. Liverpool are also quite average, with a poor defence and untested midfield. Game will probably be strewn with errors and end 2-2.The same Chelsea that finished in the bottom half of the table last season?
Which are the players Chelsea have signed that you think will elevate them from last season?They've since spent god knows how much. Liverpool are also quite average, with a poor defence and untested midfield. Game will probably be strewn with errors and end 2-2.
Liverpool didn't exactly pull up any trees last season. Think when you look at the respective squads it's fair to say that Chelsea under a new coach following a good Pre Season would be disappointed not to get a result at home.The same Chelsea that finished in the bottom half of the table last season?
Back in early December. We don't play Chelsea til thenNkunku unavailable on Sunday due to a customary and timely pre-Liverpool injury.
These wankers are off to their jammy ways and the season hasn’t even started yet!
Incredible.
The same Liverpool that finished 6 points below us in 3rd place. They had a very strong end to the season.Liverpool didn't exactly pull up any trees last season. Think when you look at the respective squads it's fair to say that Chelsea under a new coach following a good Pre Season would be disappointed not to get a result at home.
I can already see a miss hit Salah shot bouncing off Colwill’s toe, just out of Silva’s reach and into Gakpo’s path for an easy goal.I need to stop seeing every second ball somehow fall to them this season. Especially when it spins and bobbles to someone waiting in space for an easy tap in.
Yeah our form dropped off because we lost our best defender and midfielder for extended periods and had no striker.The same Liverpool that finished 6 points below us in 3rd place. They had a very strong end to the season.
It’s impossible to tell what sort of form these teams will come into the first game of the season with but there’s nothing to suggest Chelsea would be favourites over Liverpool at this point in my opinion, especially without one of their major summer signings.
I could be wrong and I hate praising Liverpool as much as the next person, but I also think it would be foolish to write them off considering how they ended last season.
Regardless the Nkunku news, which won‘t help, I do think they seriously lack quality upfront. Maybe in 2-3 years all those youngsters come off good but I see a lack of goals hindering them to win as much as needed to really go for 1-4. Still a hard side to play against and beat mind you. Maybe if they get Vlahovic in and that group of youngsters hit the ground running.Chelsea are going to shock a lot of you next a season. They have good players and a good manager, they will not be a walkover for most teams.
Was it not 8 points a difference in the end?The same Liverpool that finished 6 points below us in 3rd place. They had a very strong end to the season.
It’s impossible to tell what sort of form these teams will come into the first game of the season with but there’s nothing to suggest Chelsea would be favourites over Liverpool at this point in my opinion, especially without one of their major summer signings.
I could be wrong and I hate praising Liverpool as much as the next person, but I also think it would be foolish to write them off considering how they ended last season.
It was.Was it not 8 points a difference in the end?