Brophs
The One and Only
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 50,668
We need an number 2 that will put the Heaton on DDG
We need an number 2 that will put the Heaton on DDG
Please tell me what was so shit about this deal!Please tell me why the person in charge of transfers is not responsible for a shit deal. Very much looking forward to it
Yeah that’s what my first reaction was tooI guess we’re Top 4 rivals and now any injury to De Gea means Heaton is in goal and there’s a significant gap between the two. So they’re probably playing the odds to make sure we have no cover
If that was their plan they'd have been better recalling him on the last day of the window, not the first.I guess we’re Top 4 rivals and now any injury to De Gea means Heaton is in goal and there’s a significant gap between the two. So they’re probably playing the odds to make sure we have no cover
I like to think the blame lies at the door of EtH personally and I hope, can't speak factually as you are, hope that Murtough and EtH work this out equally and JM is not just picking players himself.Please tell me why the person in charge of transfers is not responsible for a shit deal. Very much looking forward to it
Possibly, depends on the terms of the loan. Maybe they could only recall him back within a week or so given I doubt the club would have wanted the option of the recall to be there.If that was their plan they'd have been better recalling him on the last day of the window, not the first.
It's not exactly United's fault Newcastle have recalled him. We didn't send him back. I expect most loans will have some form of recall option especially with keepers. The only thing United did wrong was sign him in the first place.
Interesting, that would suggest that the Saudi's aren't the ones buying us then?It's obvious, the Saudi's dropping the shirt deal interest, and now one of their players been recalled as soon as the contract will allow.
They know something, and don't want to be associated with us.
You mean Qatari involvement?It's obvious, the Saudi's dropping the shirt deal interest, and now one of their players been recalled as soon as the contract will allow.
They know something, and don't want to be associated with us.
Dude, take a chill. It was a loan to cover a position that was never likely to need it. It hardly matters.Another Murtough masterclass. What a genius
Interesting theory. Is it really that petty between Saudi and potentially Qatar that they act on a second string goalkeeper loan spell?It's obvious, the Saudi's dropping the shirt deal interest, and now one of their players been recalled as soon as the contract will allow.
They know something, and don't want to be associated with us.
Qatar/Dubai, and they certainly don't want any of their players to be here when it happens.You mean Qatari involvement?
A reserve keeper is like having car insurance. You don’t need it until you do. You don’t look back at the end of the year and say “pffft, $2,500 spent on insurance this year and not a single claim”, but when you rear end the car in front and face a $10,000 bill, you are very likely to say “I wish I had insurance”.£1m fee (plus wages) to have him play two games against Villa and Burnley in the League Cup.
UAE is an ally of KSA. It's more like KSA and UAE vs Qatar and Iran.Qatar/Dubai, and they certainly don't want any of their players to be here when it happens.
does nobody remember his shocker against Aston VillaVery proud of him. I laughed I cried I fist pumped the air. 100% clean sheet. Better than De Gea, vDS and Schmeichel. Farewell Dubiaska.
Well Middlesbrough. OK Oblivion. Same difference,This is like Valdes whom we didn’t see much at all and disappeared off into oblivion