Moises Caicedo | Chelsea player

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,401
Supports
Chelsea
@WeePat what's happened to him and Enzo?
They need Gallagher to hold their hand apparently. Enzo has been pretty good this season, albeit not amazing. Caicedo has been OK. Both were god awful tonight. Very discouraging to watch.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Genuinely didn't realise he was playing until I saw this thread bumped.
 

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,298
100 million for him and and another 100 million for Enzo. Very poor tonight.
 

Red in STL

Turnover not takeover
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
9,837
Location
In Bed
Supports
The only team that matters
I don't think so, Caicedo has always been rated, even pre-Brighton, and was good under Potter too. I think the combination of loss of form, increased expectation, an unsettled team around him, a new manager still finding his feet, and Chelsea's general recent chaos is enough to have affected how he looks on the pitch. And I'm informed by Chelsea fans he has had some good games for them.
He's gone from being a big fish in a little pond to a little fish in a big pond, some players can't handle it but we'll see
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,063
Location
Canada
Not easy to perform on the back of such a big price tag in a dysfunctional team. I think he'll come good long term, same with Enzo (who has been generally good anyway), but mentality is a big part after big transfers.
 

iKnowNothing

Full Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
2,844
Location
hangin in there
Not easy to perform on the back of such a big price tag in a dysfunctional team. I think he'll come good long term, same with Enzo (who has been generally good anyway), but mentality is a big part after big transfers.
.. and then we’ll sign one of them in their 30s to fix our midfield :drool:
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,401
Supports
Chelsea
Not easy to perform on the back of such a big price tag in a dysfunctional team. I think he'll come good long term, same with Enzo (who has been generally good anyway), but mentality is a big part after big transfers.
I agree. I think in general Caicedo has been OK. He just hasn’t great, or particularly impressive, which is what people expected after the season he had with Brighton and the price tag. And that’s the problem when you buy players at that price level. There’s no grace period, when realistically there should be when you consider the fact that he’s only turned 22 last month.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,605
Location
Manc
Him and Enzo are a bloody expensive pair of water carriers. 200+ million should really get you more for your money.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
He's been nothing close to what he was at Brighton, system player?
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,414
Location
Berlin
He's been nothing close to what he was at Brighton, system player?
Surely a system player but emphasized by the fact that Chelsea isn't just in lack of a good system, they apparently (based on today) have a pretty dysfunctional system going on.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
Surely a system player but emphasized by the fact that Chelsea isn't just in lack of a good system, they apparently (based on today) have a pretty dysfunctional system going on.
If he played for City he would look like Fernandinho.
 

Changeisgood

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
730
Supports
Arsenal
He needed a club where he could more simply slot in. The move was not a good one. He went to a team in relative turmoil and being as young and somewhat inexperienced as he was.... not a good idea. He will probably turn out to be decent in the end, but Chelsea was not the right destination. He should have stayed at Brighton.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,627
Guilty of charge. Thought he'd be better buy than Rice. But so far, Rice is cruising up nicely while Caicedo has minimal impact.

Still rate him though.
 

GoonerGirly

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Messages
1,034
Supports
Arsenal
Guilty of charge. Thought he'd be better buy than Rice. But so far, Rice is cruising up nicely while Caicedo has minimal impact.

Still rate him though.
There's a player in there of course and he's still very young. I'm sure he'll come good eventually. But IMO for that crazy money, you want something a bit more "guaranteed" and could make an impact immediately. His experience is definitely what we needed. Rice was already a very seasoned PL player and international and while I didn't think he'd be so good so quickly, I never doubted that he was the right player for us at this stage. Caceido had just had his real breakthrough season with Brighton when he signed for Chelsea, a bit more of a gamble IMO.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,627
There's a player in there of course and he's still very young. I'm sure he'll come good eventually. But IMO for that crazy money, you want something a bit more "guaranteed" and could make an impact immediately. His experience is definitely what we needed. Rice was already a very seasoned PL player and international and while I didn't think he'd be so good so quickly, I never doubted that he was the right player for us at this stage. Caceido had just had his real breakthrough season with Brighton when he signed for Chelsea, a bit more of a gamble IMO.
Yeah. My posts in Rice closed thread:

https://www.redcafe.net/threads/declan-rice-signs-for-arsenal.477048/post-30733564
80m for Rice is reasonable. He's not a one season wonder, and he impressed me during WC.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/declan-rice-signs-for-arsenal.477048/post-30694404
Hopefully Rice turns into Arsenal's Maguire. Slim chance (as I rate Rice pretty high), but man can hope.

although I did say this
Personally think Caicedo worth 100m. Rice is not so much.
 

LDUred

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
1,868
Brighton have been a well-coached team for a while, with a clear style of play that is effective. If you parachute one of their players into an utter train wreck of a side like Chelsea, they will undoubtedly look half the player.

It's not so much about signing good players as having a system in which they can excel.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,120
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
It's absolutely amazing that we somehow didn't buy him, considering how poor he is.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Another overhyped yute. There’s a dozen Caicedo’s in football. Glad we didn’t waste have a transfer budget on him. Be interesting to see how much money Chelsea spend next summer with yet again no European football.
 

Borys

Statistics Wizard
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,102
Location
Bielsko Biala, Poland
Guilty of charge. Thought he'd be better buy than Rice. But so far, Rice is cruising up nicely while Caicedo has minimal impact.

Still rate him though.
Same here, and in the long run I still think Caicedo will be great. But doesn't look particularly impressive so far. Defensively he's been alright I guess, but there is little ball progression from him.
 

Donut

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2004
Messages
4,863
There’s no space for both him and Lavia in the team anyway. Yeah it’s nice to have many quality players but they’re pretty similar and if Lavia doesn’t stink up the place you’d imagine he’ll bench the 120 million Caicedo.
 

Acole9

Outstanding
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
12,507
He was bang average last night. I forgot he was on the pitch until he made a foul in the second half.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,401
Supports
Chelsea
looks lazy as shit, you knew what time it was when he turned down playing for Klopp
Are you saying you knew he was lazy because he said no a team that decided they wanted to sign him in a whim?
 

el_loco_bielsa

Full Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
267
Location
Yorkshire, UK
Supports
liverpool
Are you saying you knew he was lazy because he said no a team that decided they wanted to sign him in a whim?
No, he’s saying it was pretty obvious what his priorities were when he decided to turn down klopp’s hardcore preseason double training sessions and opted for the money, the London nightlife, and the kickabout-in-a-park training sessions poch has your overpriced squad doing.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,401
Supports
Chelsea
No, he’s saying it was pretty obvious what his priorities were when he decided to turn down klopp’s hardcore preseason double training sessions and opted for the money, the London nightlife, and the kickabout-in-a-park training sessions poch has your overpriced squad doing.
It was a blatant panic bid. He turned you down because Liverpool didn’t bother speaking to the lad before throwing £111million at Brighton. You’re just here to troll though, so I’ll leave you to it.
 

el_loco_bielsa

Full Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
267
Location
Yorkshire, UK
Supports
liverpool
It was a blatant panic bid. He turned you down because Liverpool didn’t bother speaking to the lad before throwing £111million at Brighton. You’re just here to troll though, so I’ll leave you to it.
Panic bid, you say? As opposed to the comprehensively well thought out squad-building exercise your owners have undertaken at Chelsea?
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,401
Supports
Chelsea
Panic bid, you say? As opposed to the comprehensively well thought out squad-building exercise your owners have undertaken at Chelsea?
Well Chelsea have been speaking to him since January, so yes it was a deal a long time in the making. Can’t blame the lad for saying no to a team who decides to throw a record bid at him on a whim. He was chilling in London waiting for our bid to finalise when he heard about Liverpool’s random monster offer.
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,832
Location
Inside right
Well Chelsea have been speaking to him since January, so yes it was a deal a long time in the making. Can’t blame the lad for saying no to a team who decides to throw a record bid at him on a whim. He was chilling in London waiting for our bid to finalise when he heard about Liverpool’s random monster offer.
Is this a case of a player securing the bag and then putting his feet up, or is he just plain struggling for form?
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,401
Supports
Chelsea
Is this a case of a player securing the bag and then putting his feet up, or is he just plain struggling for form?
I mean there’s no evidence of the first suggestion, so my guess he’s just struggling for form. He hasn’t even been particularly bad, but I understand with his price tag, rival fans will enjoy his struggles.
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,832
Location
Inside right
I mean there’s no evidence of the first suggestion, so my guess he’s just struggling for form. He hasn’t even been particularly bad, but I understand with his price tag, rival fans will enjoy his struggles.
I don’t watch you guys at all - only game I’ve paid attention to was vs us where you were so bad, you made us look good, so no frame of reference for the player.

Would take him in a heartbeat, so surprised by how bad it sounds like he’s been.