Napoli president rules out signing Africans committed to Nations Cup

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,071
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
There's nothing wrong or racist about it. Losing a player for a chunk of time every 2 years is a little too often to be entirely happy with when you're talking about investing tens of millions. Even more so if they become a key player.

Personally, I would not go for such a policy as I think if they're good enough they're still going to make a huge contribution, so it feels like shooting yourself in the foot to limit your talent pool.
It's 5-6 games they're missing out on. The competition is less than a month. It's hardly make or break.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
I don't think it is about individual control. It's about what requires protection and why. It's about pregnancy being a biological imperative for the human race to flourish and the other being optional participation at a football tournament that the African federations are wholly responsible for organising. Apples and oranges, I think.
The african federations, not the players. That's my point. Many (most?) players dream of playing for their country, and they're being asked to give that up if they want to qualify for a job. So apples and smaller apples I'd say.
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,071
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
This SAF thing is a myth. He signed and probably wanted more African players than he did German. He wanted essien and wanted Mikel (arguably had him), signed fortune and djemba-djemba, also diouf and Manucho. If he felt you were good enough, or could potentially develop into something, he'd sign you, simple as that.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,949
Location
France
United was pioneering this last season
I'm not joking! :lol:


The FIFA calendar is a bit strange, there is a way to benefit almost everyone globally, if I'm not mistake a break in March April would allow all international tournaments to be played, I could forget a region but the weather is the most stable globally around that time and it would only take an extension of the current March international window by 20-25 days.
 

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,065
The african federations, not the players. That's my point. Many (most?) players dream of playing for their country, and they're being asked to give that up if they want to qualify for a job. So apples and smaller apples I'd say.
There are probably things you and I are giving up to qualify for any job. That's the commercial world. Wouldn't we like X weeks to pursue our dreams on full pay too? What is so important about kicking a footie around compared to my dream or yours? Ultimately there are some things that require protection on moral and ethical grounds and there are some things which don't.

The federations are nothing without players. At the moment, this is a complete non issue, I don't think Africans will be hitting the panic button because Napoli FC have taken a view, so this line of argument isn't especially important. But I would say the federations have to take into account the view of their players, and if their employment was widely impacted then I am sure we would see a compromise. This is another way in which it is distinguished from pregnancy.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
There are probably things you and I are giving up to qualify for any job. That's the commercial world. Wouldn't we like X weeks to pursue our dreams on full pay too? What is so important about kicking a footie around compared to my dream or yours? Ultimately there are some things that require protection on moral and ethical grounds and there are some things which don't.

The federations are nothing without players. At the moment, this is a complete non issue, I don't think Africans will be hitting the panic button because Napoli FC have taken a view, so this line of argument isn't especially important. But I would say the federations have to take into account the view of their players, and if their employment was widely impacted then I am sure we would see a compromise. This is another way in which it is distinguished from pregnancy.
We don't live in hypotheticals, we live in the now.

Right now, in the current system where club and international football are completely intertwined, a group of people are being rejected by an employer base on something beyond their control. That's discrimination whichever way you want to look at it.

If you agree with that discrimination for whatever reason, that's a different story.
 

DeGea’sFeet

New Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2022
Messages
733
I've not said either are acceptable. There is a case that both aren't.

Bilbao have followed this ethos since the early 1900s. It is a club policy and they don't discriminate based on a players skin colour or what national team they wish to play for.

The Napoli situation is the ethos of one man who is devaluing African football in comparison to other players and nationalities around the world.
How thou? If there were other international competitions held mid season and he only attacked the African Cup then yes. But it’s literally only this that has affected his team.
I think some people are actually patronising a whole continent by turning this into something more.

Also the Napoli guy isn’t discriminating on skin colour, Africa is a continent with every skin tone imaginable and the guy has clearly stated the criteria for signing players from African countries. Bilbao clearly do discriminate on skin tone and nationality, don’t know many Chinese, Nigerian, or Italian people who are Basque!

The closest example we have is international breaks, managers moan about that all the time but we don’t turn it into more than what it is. Managers being selfish to their own self interest.
 
Last edited:

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,643
Supports
Everton
How thou? If there were other international competitions held mid season and he only attacked the African Cup then yes. But it’s literally only this that has affected his team.
I think some people are actually patronising a whole continent by turning this into something more.

The closest example we have is international breaks, managers moan about that all the time but we don’t turn it into more than what it is. Managers being selfish to their own self interest.
The Nations League is played during the football season. You don't have people saying you can only sign for me if you refuse to play in the Nations League/Euros etc. Additionally, you have leagues and teams completely changing their season for the WC this year. There may well be some African players and fans that value AFCON as highly because they have a chance of winning it. You saw how much it meant to Senegal and Mane to win it this year.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,026
Supports
Real Madrid
if an african player is called to play in the afcon, they have no control over when it's played. Why should they be punished for it?
It is already the case that African players are punished for something they have no control over (their nationality). The punishment is that it is more difficult for football clubs to sign them.
 

GMoore23

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
3,526
Thinly veiled "I refuse to sign Africans because I'm a racist"
Hardly so. There's so much money on the line now at the top level and losing important players mid season puts it at risk.
It's not personal Sonny, It's strictly business.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,912
Yahoo put out an interesting take on this

FIFA, soccer's global governing body, has long codified that respect. It requires professional clubs to release their players for top international tournaments. And in a non-globalized world, the rule would be a non-issue. Italy's Serie A would wrap up before the Euros, and Uruguay's Primera Division would split for Copa America, and South Africa's PSL would break for AFCON, and so on, and all would be well. If Napoli's roster were largely populated by Italians, like it was decades ago, De Laurentiis would have no problem.

But European soccer, of course, consolidated its wealth, and began attracting stars from all around the world. Four leagues and a dozen clubs in particular, driven by ruthless commercialism, priced out every other continent, and began offering salaries that the Global South could not, and cannot, match.

And then, emboldened by their wealth and amplified by Eurocentric media, they began pressuring the rest of the soccer world to heed their demands.

AFCON has been a winter-spring tournament since its founding in the 1950s. That it now presents a conflict for elite players is a problem of Europe's own neocolonial making. And yet Europe, rather than elevate the AFCON alongside the Euros — they are equivalents, after all — has primarily treated it as a nuisance. Clubs rejoiced when organizers moved the 2019 edition to the summer. They whined and complained when it returned to the winter in 2022 amid the pandemic.

"Is there ever a tournament more disrespected than the Africa Cup of Nations?" wondered former England striker Ian Wright.

"The coverage," Wright said, "is completely tinged with racism."

The tournament, said Crystal Palace coach Patrick Vieira, a Senegalese-born Frenchman, "needs to be more respected — because this competition is as important as the European Championships."

But it isn't treated as such in England. It's not difficult to see the double-standard throughout Europe, especially when people like De Laurentiis make it explicit. They only know positions of power, and expect the world to bend to their will. If, in some alternate reality, a Canadian club began signing top Italian players, and its season did not halt for the Euros, how would an Italian feel if that Canadian club pressured players to skip the Euros?

But because it is Africa, the world's most oppressed and neglected continent, and because Europeans have never had to deal with anything of the sort, and because they only consider their own perspectives, they have the gall to suggest that a player should prioritize a few club games over the biggest or second-biggest international tournament of his life.

They have never considered that, perhaps, a far more reasonable solution would be for European leagues to adopt extended winter breaks that would cover all or part of AFCON.

At the very least, they could empathize with their players, and enthusiastically embrace their AFCON participation.
https://sports.yahoo.com/news/napol...aurelio-de-laurentiis-comments-190903428.html
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
It is already the case that African players are punished for something they have no control over (their nationality). The punishment is that it is more difficult for football clubs to sign them.
That's not what I see. If players are good, clubs will sign them, even if they have to miss an average of 3 or 4 matches a season because of the afcon. Which if we are honest is basically nothing when compared to what they contribute to the club.

Napoli is outright saying they don't care how good they are. If they're african, they don't want them. That's discrimination.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,534
Bilbao clearly do discriminate on skin tone and nationality, don’t know many Chinese, Nigerian, or Italian people who are Basque!
They accept anyone who has spent sufficient time in the youth system of a Basque club.

Their policy is worth debating but they clearly do not discriminate against anyone based on skin tone or nationality.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,643
Supports
Everton
Also the Napoli guy isn’t discriminating on skin colour, Africa is a continent with every skin tone imaginable and the guy has clearly stated the criteria for signing players from African countries. Bilbao clearly do discriminate on skin tone and nationality, don’t know many Chinese, Nigerian, or Italian people who are Basque!
Have you heard of the Williams brothers? Their parents are from Ghana and they are black.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,534

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,949
Location
France
Have you heard of the Williams brothers? Their parents are from Ghana and they are black.
He could check the teams right now most age class have at least one black kid. Athletic policy is to only have local or basque players, being born or bred in the region is enough.
 

DeGea’sFeet

New Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2022
Messages
733
The Nations League is played during the football season. You don't have people saying you can only sign for me if you refuse to play in the Nations League/Euros etc. Additionally, you have leagues and teams completely changing their season for the WC this year. There may well be some African players and fans that value AFCON as highly because they have a chance of winning it. You saw how much it meant to Senegal and Mane to win it this year.
National League are played in the summer.

Qualifiers are played during the season and league matches stop on the weekend before. Not as if teams are playing without their best players. So it’s not comparable but still an annoyance that I’m sure most manager would rather not have.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,643
Supports
Everton
National League are played in the summer.

Qualifiers are played during the season and league matches stop on the weekend before. Not as if teams are playing without their best players. So it’s not comparable but still an annoyance that I’m sure most manager would rather not have.
It's the Nations League, there are no qualifiers. Either way it doesn't take away from the original point that people don't hold AFCON as the same value as the Euros, Copa etc which is disrespectful and devaluing to African players, fans and people.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,643
Supports
Everton
Lucky for them they’re not from Ghana otherwise they’d never get signed by Bilbao
Inaki Williams has declared to play for Ghana... + being from somewhere is far more nuanced than being born there.
 
Last edited:

Bole Top

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
3,540
Have you heard of the Williams brothers? Their parents are from Ghana and they are black.
they were born in Bilbao. if they weren't and they spent early years in London for example, they would have been rejected on that particular basis. it's an obvious case of "discrimination" for everyone else, but the one we accepted. it will be the same with Napoli.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,643
Supports
Everton
they were born in Bilbao. if they weren't and they spent early years in London for example, they would have been rejected on that particular basis. it's an obvious case of "discrimination" for everyone else, but the one we accepted. it will be the same with Napoli.
And? Where did I argue that they weren't? The poster said that Bilbao discriminate based on nationality and skin tone. That's not true.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,026
Supports
Real Madrid
Have you heard of the Williams brothers? Their parents are from Ghana and they are black.
Due to a relatively low immigrant population in the region, the policy also had the consequence of Athletic Bilbao having been the last club in La Liga to field a black player. That was ended in 2011 when Jonás Ramalho, whose father is Angolan, made his debut. In 2015 Iñaki Williams (born in Bilbao to Ghanaian immigrant parents) became Athletic's first black goalscorer. Prior to Ramalho, in 2000 the first African-born player in the club's youth system was Blanchard Moussayou whose promising career was curtailed by injury; some years later, he stated his belief that it was 'twice as hard' for a black player to make an impact at the club.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,949
Location
France
they were born in Bilbao. if they weren't and they spent early years in London for example, they would have been rejected on that particular basis. it's an obvious case of "discrimination" for everyone else, but the one we accepted. it will be the same with Napoli.
Not exactly, to be eligible you need to be homegrown. Of course if you are not born in Basque country, haven't been developed in a basque club and you have no link to Basque country outside of being currently in the reigon, you are not eligible.
 

DeGea’sFeet

New Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2022
Messages
733
It's the Nations League, there are no qualifiers. Either way it doesn't take away from the original point that people don't hold AFCON as the same value as the Euros, Copa etc which is disrespectful and devaluing to African players, fans and people.
Think you’re mistake. Teams play in a league format to qualify for the finals in the summer. So they are essentially qualifiers.

Don’t know what to say about your second point. Please explain what you mean by people and hold to the same value?
 

Bole Top

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
3,540
Not exactly, to be eligible you need to be homegrown. Of course if you are not born in Basque country, haven't been developed in a basque club and you have no link to Basque country outside of being currently in the reigon, you are not eligible.
which is my point obviously - not everyone can play for them, in fact, very low % of players can - because they decided that way. it's a definition of exlusive club that nobody have and never had problem with. private owners like current Napoli boss should have that same liberty without bringing all this racism talk into it.
 

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,493
Location
London
They should be because its something many clubs and managers are annoyed about and seem to factor in when signing players. SAF used to complain about it as well.
Didums, hasn’t stopped African players being signed by the biggest clubs in the world.
Managers and chairmen will whinge about everything and anything. So again, doubt Africa give a feck.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,949
Location
France
which is my point obviously - not everyone can play for them, in fact, very low % of players can - because they decided that way. it's a definition of exlusive club that nobody have and never had problem with. private owners like current Napoli boss should have that same liberty without bringing all this racism talk into it.
But the post that you quoted was about them descriminating based on skin color, which isn't really the case. Bilbao goal is to promote local young footballers and basque decents, by definition it's a small portion of people but it's not limited to skin color or your ethnicity. The easiest way to play for them is to play for a basque club as a kid, that's how Laporte did it, iirc he had to play for the Aviron Bayonnais in order to join the Athletic.
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,071
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
which is my point obviously - not everyone can play for them, in fact, very low % of players can - because they decided that way. it's a definition of exlusive club that nobody have and never had problem with. private owners like current Napoli boss should have that same liberty without bringing all this racism talk into it.
It's one thing to say you're only signing players who had their football education in your own region. It's another to say you're not signing any players from a particular continent because they might miss a max of 6 games every 2 years.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,643
Supports
Everton
Think you’re mistake. Teams play in a league format to qualify for the finals in the summer. So they are essentially qualifiers.

Don’t know what to say about your second point. Please explain what you mean by people and hold to the same value?
They market it as the Nations League, not the Nations League qualifiers. It's a new format and tournament but it's played within the season.

It's self explanatory. The yahoo article makes a good point. Would people expect the Euros to be moved if an MLS team suddenly started hoovering up the top talent that would be playing there? Of course not. They'd say the MLS team was talking shite. The AFCON is less marketed, less respected as a spectacle and the players desire to play in it is often seen as odd by non-Africans within football who don't put it on the same pedestal as other tournaments because of when it is played and because of backwards thinking.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,789
Location
india
These big statements are always dumb. For the right price, he’ll have Mane over Charlie Adam even if Charlie Adam can play a few more games over a 4 year period.
He knows he can't sign a Mane. The difference between the alternatives wouldn't be a huge deal hence its fine for him to stick his stance.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,714
Didums, hasn’t stopped African players being signed by the biggest clubs in the world.
Managers and chairmen will whinge about everything and anything. So again, doubt Africa give a feck.
De laurentiis and SAF were among the few who had spoken about their intentions. I am sure that there are other clubs who keep such policy under wraps and many more who take AFCON in account prior signing new players. Not to forget those players who choose to represent their adopted country instead to avoid hurting their career too much.

It's a shame because the African continent can become the next SA football wise. It's also a way to help people get pulled out of poverty and can be a great tool to tackle racism.
 

Bole Top

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
3,540
But the post that you quoted was about them descriminating based on skin color, which isn't really the case. Bilbao goal is to promote local young footballers and basque decents, by definition it's a small portion of people but it's not limited to skin color or your ethnicity. The easiest way to play for them is to play for a basque club as a kid, that's how Laporte did it, iirc he had to play for the Aviron Bayonnais in order to join the Athletic.
but it's limited to other things.

1. how do you choose to be born in Basq country? you obviously can't.
2. how many kids from around the world actually have the chance to move to Basque country in that age? they're fecking kids, they depend on their parents.

all this sounds clear and easy on paper but is far from being that way. if you're kid from Ankara/Rio/Johanseburg, your path is in 99% cases sealed when it comes to playing from Bilbao. that's the simple truth.

Napoli will exlude much lower number of players than Bilbao will. the only difference I see is that their old president isn't camuflaging it under "encouraging young Basq players" policy. he could care less about age, sex. orientation, skin and nationality. he's looking at his club only and he isn't hiding it.
 

Chipper

Adulterer.
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
5,684
It's the Nations League, there are no qualifiers. Either way it doesn't take away from the original point that people don't hold AFCON as the same value as the Euros, Copa etc which is disrespectful and devaluing to African players, fans and people.
The Euros and Copa simply has better teams participating so why would people in general value them the same?

South American people and Europeans have their countries involved in those tournaments so why would they in particular?

At least AFCON gets way more coverage in the UK compared to the AFC Asian cup even though both continents perform at a similar level in World Cups. That, justifiably so is likely down to the large number of African ex-pats and their descendents currently living in the country.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,643
Supports
Everton
The Euros and Copa simply has better teams participating so why would people in general value them the same?

South American people and Europeans have their countries involved in those tournaments so why would they in particular?

At least AFCON gets way more coverage in the UK compared to the AFC Asian cup even though both continents perform at a similar level in World Cups. That, justifiably so is likely down to the large number of African ex-pats and their descendents currently living in the country.
How are teams meant to get better if you don't afford them the same opportunities to get better by supporting their infrastructure? In a footballing perspective they're better statistically but perhaps not to African people and their players. It means as much to them to play in AFCON as it does to Euro/Copa players. Plus the National League in England doesn't have better teams than the PL but why shouldn't they have the same value? They are just as important to football in England as the PL teams are.
 
Last edited:

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,949
Location
France
but it's limited to other things.

1. how do you choose to be born in Basq country? you obviously can't.
2. how many kids from around the world actually have the chance to move to Basque country in that age? they're fecking kids, they depend on their parents.

all this sounds clear and easy on paper but is far from being that way. if you're kid from Ankara/Rio/Johanseburg, your path is in 99% cases sealed when it comes to playing from Bilbao. that's the simple truth.

Napoli will exlude much lower number of players than Bilbao will. the only difference I see is that their old president isn't camuflaging it under "encouraging young Basq players" policy. he could care less about age, sex. orientation, skin and nationality. he's looking at his club only and he isn't hiding it.
Okay, you are going on a tangent here. I already justified the rational behind De Laurentiis point so I won't get involved in that one.
 

Bole Top

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
3,540
Okay, you are going on a tangent here. I already justified the rational behind De Laurentiis point so I won't get involved in that one.
nah, I'm done actually since I said everyhing I have to say about both cases. both Bilbao and Napoli policies I find 100% acceptable.
 

Chipper

Adulterer.
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
5,684
How are teams meant to get better if you don't afford them the same opportunities to get better by supporting their infrastructure? In a footballing perspective they're better statistically but perhaps not to African people and their players. It means as much to them to play in AFCON as it does to Euro/Copa players.
Of course it means as much to the players involved and the fans, agree wholeheartedly.

Just don't really get why you'd expect people in general to value them the same.

Wouldn't be surprised if many Africans don't give a crap about the Euros and I wouldn't see that as a bad thing.

Then if you have for example a Korean football fan, they're probably going to be interested in the AFC Asian Cup but then if they are going to watch other tournaments would likely go for the Euros or Copa before AFCON so they can watch legendary national teams like Brazil, Argentina, Germany, Italy etc.

Just seems normal/not a problem.