Definately a reboot.
I'd definitely hang around for a snog...Not so much standing around listening to the baddie gloat.
A bit late to the party, but the missus and I just finally saw it tonight. Was a bit odd, that one minute the bomb was going to blow in 23 days and in the next scene it was 11 hours off. Could they really keep Gotham City for three or four months. Was decent enough and maybe I will enjoy it more on a second viewing but agree with others saying it is probably the weakest of a very strong three.Same. It was ok.
Not enough Batman though. A few punches and an occasional gadget is about it. Didn't care for how it set up the characters either, it was all too rushed in a film that was too long. Somehow
Oh and I don't think they conveyed how the time passed at all well either, but that's a small gripe.
Nuke the Fridge is the site breaking it and apparently have been pretty good on news like this a few times before, and here's another snippet from another site:
All interesting, especially the stuff about the IMAX platters. Fingers crossed we get a Director's Cut now, but this is Nolan afterall!
Rushed?
was not that impressed,I found him very hard to understand most of the time.
Admittedly if there was bad sound when watching it, then it wouldn't have been easy, but I don't get all the voice complaints. I found him very easy to understand most of the time.
Same here, except during the first scene in the plane, where the voice was pretty weird (but I think I read somewhere they had to re-dub it or something). His voice really didn't bother me, and I thought he was great as Bane.
I think we could all make a voice be memorable. Perhaps the key would be to also not make people want to bang their head into a brick wall everytime they heard it.
If it's the scene when Batman rescues JGL then it's just really shoddy directing/editing.
This is pretty much what happens in the comics, and what happens in most Super Hero stories. The Batman games for PS3 etc all have this too. It's not a documentary, it's a story about a man who dresses as a bat and jumps from tall buildings, floating by use of a cape. The realism expected from these films is a bit silly, really.
The thing is all three of the movies had elements of unrealism about them but people are making it out as if they are realistic whereas this isn't! I remember someone pointing out when he lit up the batman sign on the bridge how stupid it was, just remember sitting there wondering if this guy realises he is watching a Batman movie or not....
Yeah it was that exact scene iirc.
I get that this is a superhero film and realism shouldn't be expected but when you see 4 guys with machine guns attacking a superhero and taking turns to do this it's the sort of fiction that just doesn't belong in any movie. I wouldn't have mind if Batman shot lasers out of his ass to fend the others off while taking them out one by one but just standing there like idiots with a gun in their hands annoyed me a bit.
One man's quest to get retribution following his parents death, by trying to stop villains in a moral way (no killing) and without expecting anything in return (identity kept secret). Basically the usual good vs evil stuff
Yeah, it's not complicated. Good trilogy, hitting occasional great highs. It could (and already has) been done a lot worse.
