My point exactly.
Bruce may have been a great defender for the EPL of the time which struggled back then against the top foreign clubs. However those who got raised up watching the likes of Baresi, Bergomi, Maldini and Koeman play knew the massive gap between what the EPL of the time could offer in terms of defenders as compared to what the other leagues could offer. The likes of Bruce would have struggled in the late 80s and early 90s Serie A. He lacked the speed, the brilliance and the positioning sense to make it. A brick wall may be great to keep the typical England's striker of the time at bay but would have ended up slaughtered by the likes of Romario, Stoichkov, Roberto Baggio or Van Basten who had more to offer than simple physical strength or pace.
Incidently few years (or decade) later England would end up producing the best defender of his generation, a genius in his own right. His name? Rio Ferdinand. Rio had everything, speed, positional sense, leadership, intelligence and technique. If he was Italian he would have been likened to the true greats such as Maldini (he reminded me a lot of him) for the simple reason that he had no weaknesses and could win the ball without having to dive in tackles. Unfortunately there's plenty of EPL fans around who prefer Vidic or Terry instead of him. There again, we're talking about fans who question whether Scholes (another British gem and a unique player in his own right) is better than frigging Lampard and who find Jones antic of heading the pitch as a show of commitment rather then simply.....sad.
And before you criticize me I invite you to first sit down, take a beer and watch some old matches of the time. I did that with my cousin few weeks ago and we were both amazed about the amount of space British defenders used to allow opposition to do the damage.