izec
Full Member
Ronaldoesque in his prime United time.
Was unbelievable
Was unbelievable
Reminds me of the one he scored against the World XI in a charity match.Ronaldoesque in his prime United time.
Was unbelievable
Enjoy the moment you miserable feckerI don't mean to sound like a glass half empty type of guy, but we're probably going to pay for that goal in shooting hubris, i.e. by a long series of ambitious and failed attempted strikes from Rashy.
I didEnjoy the moment you miserable fecker
That freekick technique is pretty much pot luck, you're relying on fecking up the stability of the airflow by hitting the valve. Even Ronaldo has an absolutely horrible conversion rate, but when it works it's amazing.Wonder how many of them he's got on target this season.
Yeah, it's blind luck. Ronaldo is shit at freekicks, but when they do go in they are spectacular.That freekick technique is pretty much pot luck, you're relying on fecking up the stability of the airflow by hitting the valve. Even Ronaldo has an absolutely horrible conversion rate, but when it works it's amazing.
The more he practises,the luckier he getsYeah, it's blind luck. Ronaldo is shit at freekicks, but when they do go in they are spectacular.
Ronaldo? His conversation rates suggests he's not that lucky. He had 1 from 93 at one point. Neither is Rashford, it's only the second or third he's scored from a lot of attempts.The more he practises,the luckier he gets
It's not pot luck. If you hit the ball the same way 100 times you will get the exact same result 100 times. It's physics not magic.That freekick technique is pretty much pot luck, you're relying on fecking up the stability of the airflow by hitting the valve. Even Ronaldo has an absolutely horrible conversion rate, but when it works it's amazing.
Chelsea, obvs.Which do you prefer:
vs Chelsea
or
vs Celta Vigo
57So how many ‘tries’ before we see his next FK banger? We can make this into a thing
And ignoring other condition (wind, ball condition, pitch condition, etc.)? If you hit the ball the same way 100 times you may get many different results because you're doing it in real world, not simulation.It's not pot luck. If you hit the ball the same way 100 times you will get the exact same result 100 times. It's physics not magic.
Having said that, the reason why Ronaldo and Rashford get it wrong so often is because there is very little margin for error with this technique. You have to hit it with power at a precise spot and a slight variation in hitting the spot coukd lead to a very different outcome.
It's obvious Rashford must be scoring loads of these in training.
This is real life, not a simulation model.It's not pot luck. If you hit the ball the same way 100 times you will get the exact same result 100 times. It's physics not magic.
Having said that, the reason why Ronaldo and Rashford get it wrong so often is because there is very little margin for error with this technique. You have to hit it with power at a precise spot and a slight variation in hitting the spot coukd lead to a very different outcome.
It's obvious Rashford must be scoring loads of these in training.
As far as the free kicks themselves, yeah, agreed.Chelsea, obvs.
Not 21 anymoreThat was a stunning goal. Fans often forget Rashford is only 21 y.o. and there is every reason to expect he can become (much) better than he is now.
Yup. That was an absolute beauty, but he only does that 1/20 times, so we need someone who can be a consistent threat on FK's. Pereira is at least better on corners than Youngs floating shite, but there is still room for improvement and in any case dont i think Pereira will be a mainstay in this side once we get some new midfielders inAbsolutely stunning strike but we still need a consistent set-piece specialist.
Reminds me of Ronaldo’s one against Sunderland same side and went in at the same height!Absolutely stunning strike but we still need a consistent set-piece specialist.