I wasn't talking about materialistic things.No way it's worse than for an average person. It's a similar trauma but for most of us it's much more difficult to replace stolen valuables than it is for a professional footballer.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
I wasn't talking about materialistic things.No way it's worse than for an average person. It's a similar trauma but for most of us it's much more difficult to replace stolen valuables than it is for a professional footballer.
I think rich people spending money is always a good thing, it helps the economy, the more they spend the better it is for everyone else.If you need to spend £10k on a handbag to get some low class tart to sleep with you, then you have a problem.
Sounds like trickle down economicsI think rich people spending money is always a good thing, it helps the economy, the more they spend the better it is for everyone else.
It depends on what the money is being spent on. The labour-value being put into a designer handbag is a total waste of resources...it is labour-value that could be used elsewhere. 1000 people spending £10 on a handbag would be significantly more beneficial to the economy than some WAG spending £10k on one.I think rich people spending money is always a good thing, it helps the economy, the more they spend the better it is for everyone else.
Would be interesting to know whats better for the economy, your average footballer in the 50% that go broke within 5 years of retirement or a footballer who misers and hordes.Sounds like trickle down economics
People already made tha..... Oh wait...PSG will come in with a bid now
Just logged on. Great minds etc etcPeople already made tha..... Oh wait...
Eh? You'll have the explain that one to me.It depends on what the money is being spent on. The labour-value being put into a designer handbag is a total waste of resources...it is labour-value that could be used elsewhere. 1000 people spending £10 on a handbag would be significantly more beneficial to the economy than some WAG spending £10k on one.
People already made tha..... Oh wait...
He is very very good at what he does.I know, of course. It's just the idea that someone who isn't very good at what he does has that sort of money...
People already made tha..... Oh wait...
People already made tha..... Oh wait...
I don't believe in trickle down theory, but since there are rich people with plenty of money, it helps the economy if they spend it.Sounds like trickle down economics
This sounds like an add for a Russian Bridal Site.You would buy a woman for 10k?
Hermes Birkin Handbag - Cost: $23,775.00 At least it's got Free Shipping!They are said to have made off with a £15,000 Cartier bracelet, a £10,000 Hermes Birkin handbad and an Audemars Piguet watch worth £50,000.
The raiders then demanded the keys to a £100,000 Range Rover before using it to make their getaway.
Be pretty useless to the burglars with that padlock on it tbfHermes Birkin Handbag - Cost: $23,775.00 At least it's got Free Shipping!
WAG bags would definitely be pricey as none of them would be caught dead with cheap accessories. Anyway, all the burglars need is to steal and the police would give them a value assessment the next day assisting the burglars to fence it at proper price.how does anyone know what a hand bags worth or av I missed something ?
Yep same here.Love reading threads like this here. The poor guy was robbed in his home. Who cares if he has expensive jewelry and handbags there? It's his money he earned, he can spend it how he likes. So many jealous people in here upset that some people make a lot of money. So much demonization of those with wealth.
As for the gun comment, this would have ended differently in Texas. Someone robs my home with a bat when I'm there with my wife and kid, they're leaving with their tail between their legs or in a body bag, and rightfully so.
The use of the phrase gold-digger and implication that Cleverley's girlfriend will only sleep with him in return for expensive trinkets suggests that the green-eyed monster might have a part to play in this latest rant. Perhaps getting all swole hasn't turned him into quite the cassanova he thought it would?
You're getting a lot of stick for this but feck them, you absolutely have a valid point.It depends on what you're spending it on.
In my eyes, a flash millionaire who spends tens of thousands of pounds on jewelry is materialistic scum in the same way that some grisly chav is materialistic scum for spending half a week's wages on a £100 pair of designer jeans. They are all the same to me.
A 50,000 pound watch, incredible.'They are said to have made off with a £15,000 Cartier bracelet, a £10,000 Hermes Birkin handbad and an Audemars Piguet watch worth £50,000'
That's fecking obscene. No sympathy from me at all.
Not at all. It's been like that forever and ever. Even Seneca, that old feck who once claimed that he carries everything with him that he owned, was known to have amassed a huge fortune after making it big in roman society and reportedly dined off tables made from lemon tree wood with ivory legs. When people get rich, they buy expensive crap no matter how many poor people might be around. Since always. The big difference in modern society is that we can now see pictures, tweets and videos of those rich people and their golden crap whenever we fancy it.I wouldn't necessarily say those in question are 'scum', but it's certainly indicative of modern society that some cnut would spend £15k on a watch or whatever, (and then be defended by a bunch of strangers on the internet for doing so) when you see endless stories of children(etc) needing a couple of grand for life saving treatment, going unaided.
Sounds a lot, but it isn't. Not in the whacky world of watches.A 50,000 pound watch, incredible.
Maybe they bused it?!Typical scousers. Oh wait he still lives in crime free Manchester.
I know that he doesn't.
How much does Tom Cleverley contribute to charity, exactly?You're getting a lot of stick for this but feck them, you absolutely have a valid point.
I wouldn't necessarily say those in question are 'scum', but it's certainly indicative of modern society that some cnut would spend £15k on a watch or whatever, (and then be defended by a bunch of strangers on the internet for doing so) when you see endless stories of children(etc) needing a couple of grand for life saving treatment, going unaided.
I wouldn't like people telling me how to spend my money and I'm not short on material goods myself, so I can see the hypocrisy here. Even so, I can't help think it's fecking vulgar spending so much on materialistic 'luxury'.
£5 pound a month direct debit to the RSPCA and a couple of quid in the collection pot for Bernardo's on his weekly Tesco shop?How much does Tom Cleverley contribute to charity, exactly?
Nope, not really. Assuming the material cost for a £10 handbag is around £3 to £4, you get around £6 to redistribute to employees (labour, marketing, support). Material cost for a £10k will be significantly smaller than 30-40% hence the amount of money the seller has left will be higher. Obviously it's all theoretical because there's no way that all this money will be redistributed and a £10 handbag sold 1,000 times could still generate more income for employees but it's not as straightforward as you present because there are other sides to it.It depends on what the money is being spent on. The labour-value being put into a designer handbag is a total waste of resources...it is labour-value that could be used elsewhere. 1000 people spending £10 on a handbag would be significantly more beneficial to the economy than some WAG spending £10k on one.
I assumed with you calling him a cnut for spending money on a watch whilst there are kids out there needing operations that you'd have had a breakdown of his charitable contributions in order to be able to draw some kind of conclusions.£5 pound a month direct debit to the RSPCA and a couple of quid in the collection pot for Bernardo's on his weekly Tesco shop?
I might have missed a couple of things though, so feel free to tell me how wonderful he really is.
Guns. A shotgun preferably and a couple of handguns. Those fools wouldn't rob a rich person in America with baseball batsIf only Cleverly had a gun.
Runs away
No they'd rob them with guns.Guns. A shotgun preferably and a couple of handguns. Those fools wouldn't rob a rich person in America with baseball bats