Wumminator
The Qatar Pounder
He’s gonna put the city on lockdown.Duncan from Blue is all over this...no worries!
He’s gonna put the city on lockdown.Duncan from Blue is all over this...no worries!
It does suck. And its being really something that needs to be a part of the national and global conversation about COVIDhttps://www.vox.com/2020/5/8/21251899/coronavirus-long-term-effects-symptoms
Well this sucks. Lets hope theres permanent immunity or second infections will be catastrophic
To be fair, a lot of those complications you mention would be common to any ITU admission, for any reason. Which would include flu. Also worth bearing in mind that even the non-ITU related sequelae seem to only be an issue for patients severe enough to end up in hospital.It does suck. And its being really something that needs to be a part of the national and global conversation about COVID
The only metric currently really being used to debate restrictive measures is death rate and whether its an over and under-reaction.
Which is why I find case fatality rate to be simply one part of the wider picture when discussing this disease.
Any herd immunity like strategy would have to take into account that we would be exposing a significant proportion of the population to risks of pulmonary emobolism, strokes, myocarditis, cardiomyopathies, kidney complications, limb venous thrombosis (with potential amputation risks in extreme), possibly irreversible lung damage, intubation complications, tracheostomy complications, increased heart attack risks, vasculitis-like rashes in adults and children , neurological complication, psychological complications, memory and cognitive deficits if they recover from delirium. That is simply not the case when thinking of the flu.
Statisticians are offering their 2 pence on risks of dying but not many are commenting on the risks of the above in those hospitalised who make it out alive and risks to economies if we see a significant percentage of our workforce struck down with the potentially debilitating conditions listed above in short and long term.
He’s gonna put the city on lockdown.
That's fair. I suppose its the wide range and extent of complications, the incidences and what I've read in case reports thats worrying.To be fair, a lot of those complications you mention would be common to any ITU admission, for any reason. Which would include flu. Also worth bearing in mind that even the non-ITU related sequelae seem to only be an issue for patients severe enough to end up in hospital.
I haven’t seen anything anywhere about non-hospitalised patients having permanent consequences of their illness. Lots of stuff about being drained of energy, or reduced exercise tolerance but, again, nothing you can’t get with a bad flu. And we need to keep reminding ourselves that the vast vast majority of future infections will sit in this category.
It’s really hard to keep on top of the science here, it’s so fast moving. But I do think a lot of the non peer-reviewed publications like the one linked above are biased towards exaggeration of the severity of the disease. As that generates more clicks.
And I’m saying this as one of this threads chief scare-mongers!
He’s gonna put the city on lockdown.
Sounds grim. I have some experience of the care home sector on the legal side. As an industry, they are not anywhere near as profitable as the sums they charge would suggest and care home providers often go out of business. The main issue is rents on the buildings which are extortionate. At the start of a lease they often get a favourable deal (since the building is empty) but thereafter, landlords (often institutional investors such as pension funds) hike the rent.Regarding the talk about care homes - really nasty situations from the sounds of it.
My mother works in a private care home and the treatment of staff (and indeed residents) there has been abhorrent. She was refused PPE when she expressed concerns and was told she is “much safer here than at home” - this is to a woman who lives completely safely on her own at home. I should add the owners/higher ups who say this have not entered the home itself for weeks now.
There are currently 8 staff in the home who have tested positive (thankfully my mother tested negative in her test a couple days ago), and 4/5 residents have tested positive. However, she tells me she is certain the number is higher as they have had at least double the ‘usual’ number of deaths in the last 4 weeks. From the sounds of it they are simply refusing to accept the levels of COVID within the home - disgraceful really, particularly as it costs £1,400/week for the residents to stay.
She tells me the home has been reported twice to some authority - unsurprisingly from the sounds of it. I really feel for the staff, residents and families stuck in this situation
EDIT: I also remember her telling me staff were threatened with no sick pay when the virus was in its infancy in this country. Which is obviously not fair - it shows they have absolutely refused to take the situation seriously from the start.
I’d just like to say I’m impressed by your use of heuristic bias!That's fair. I suppose its the wide range and extent of complications, the incidences and what I've read in case reports thats worrying.
From what I'm reading on GP forums on facebook, there's persistently weird symptoms that are there almost a month or so after with chest pains, coughs, myalgia etc but i suppose yes that you can get post-viral. Just the amplification of it on a population wide basis scares me.
I think I may have a heuristic bias though given that I have only worked with hospitalised covid patients.
Fcuk me - will this shit never end?https://www.vox.com/2020/5/8/21251899/coronavirus-long-term-effects-symptoms
Well this sucks. Lets hope theres permanent immunity or second infections will be catastrophic
It highlights a problem that when people are ill (regardless of what they have), they are pressured into working. This seems to be an issue in the UK and I am sure many other countries as well. Maybe after this has blown over, we will have better regulations in place here in the UK.Thought this was a main symptom but even today not regarded as such in the UK.
Yes! PerfectHe’s gonna put the city on lockdown.
That's from yesterday, but imagine it is the same again.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Americans? I thought it was anti-quarantiners? You can’t seem to keep this straight.English . Nearly as bad as Amercians
Don't take life so seriousAmericans? I thought it was anti-quarantiners? You can’t seem to keep this straight.
Well of course you’d say that. You clearly don’t put much stock in it.Don't take life so serious
You remind me of my ex wife at her worstWell of course you’d say that. You clearly don’t put much stock in it.
Thank you.You remind me of my ex wife at her worst
He’s got bigger boobs, so I hearYou remind me of my ex wife at her worst
The nicest ones money could buy.He’s got bigger boobs, so I hear
How else are they supposed to get to work? They are following government advice.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Car if they have one, walk / cycle if practical, or avoid peak times if they are using public transport. It’s difficult though.How else are they supposed to get to work? They are following government advice.
Grant Shapps, the transport secretary, is saying it's your 'civic duty' to avoid public transport. For the millionth time, you couldn't make this shit up.How else are they supposed to get to work? They are following government advice.
Are they effectively saying that if you can’t get to work without using public transport (or at least not at peak times) then you shouldn’t go to work?Grant Shapps, the transport secretary, is saying it's your 'civic duty' to avoid public transport. For the millionth time, you couldn't make this shit up.
Yeah, just over half of people in London own a car and the average person lives 11 miles from work. The idea that public transport wouldn't be packed in different clusters in London is pretty silly, but they knew that when they announced it.In a city which prided itself on public transport, where one could work and live miles apart comfortably, I'm not surprised tubes and busses are full.
I imagine less and less Londoners drive because you simply don't need to, the public transport links are that good.
So when you're telling people to go back to work, what are people expecting? Sure a handful will cycle, but vast majority won't for a variety of reasons.
Thats what they should be sayingAre they effectively saying that if you can’t get to work without using public transport (or at least not at peak times) then you shouldn’t go to work?