Don't think this is true. I believe any country in the EU has the right to ban individuals to travel or live there within reason.
We are weapons makers period and sell to the highest bidder. Weapons other countries can use for their defence. The argument is that they would be purchased elsewhere, possibly from the Russians or French. Unfortunately you do not get to decide how one uses them although I am opposed to the Saudis, I just refuse to equate this to Isis ideology. Also I disagree about reckless bombing in Syria as we tend to aim for Isis controlled territory.
Bangladeshi citizenship is provided primarily jus sanguinis, or through bloodline, irrespectively of the place or legitimacy of the birth. Therefore, any person born to a Bangladeshi woman illegitimately outside Bangladeshi soil would still be a Bangladeshi citizen, whereas a person born to two non-nationals in Bangladesh would not.
Can I please dislike that post?
Yes, if the ban is put in place. It’s easy enough to cross borders though as so many don’t have any passport checks.
You have my blessingCan I please dislike that post?
I try hard not to use the function for main-users.
Dual citizenship must be applied for. Add the facts she's never been to the country and the country has "a zero tolerance approach to terrorism and violent extremism", it's fair to assume that this ting ain't popping yo.
Are you equating ISIS with US and UK? That would be stupid.
Very well said.
This is simply wrong.
They would say that as they do not want responsibility of out terrorists but lawyers have advised the government she is automatically a citizen so this will be a dragged out saga. Who knows, they may not be able to even block it. We'll just wait and see and she'll be in a camp for a few years
Her Dad lives there doesn't he?
Yeah I think this is part of the government's intention, to make it a long and hard process to act as a deterrent for others like her who may come out the woodwork or even other youngsters on the fringes who may be considering to do something as stupid a her.
I'm not entirely sure tbh.
Oh is it. Why?
I’m guessing you’re talking about this...
Which if that’s the case, her being 19 would mean that ruling doesn’t apply to her.
The key words there are that they hadn't attempted to retain the citizenship, meaning there is a process of application, which doesn't look like she'd get through anyways, going back to the BBC link I posted.
1) She is a known ISIS associate. I can't speak for all countries, but those where I know the laws that in itself is a crime and enough to be bared from entry (obviously not if she were citizen of that country too).
Sure it’s a key word... it means she still has the opportunity to until she’s 21.
You’re missing the point. They can only stop her travelling throughout Europe if they happen to stop her and check her details for some reason. That bit is correct whether you like it or not.
Opportunity to apply. The government can use its discretion and refuse.
They would stop her & check her details when she would try and leave the UK or Ireland. The border is 2 ways, we check details when someone is entering the UK and they check details when someone is entering into the Schengen region.
She would need to get into Schengen which is the same as getting into the UK. Also you said:
You're second claim would be true whether she was a European citizen or not, if she did it illegally(if the premise were true to begin with). Also open boarders do not equate to no checks, it's delusional to suggest it does.
I take it you missed the programme where some people walked through border checkpoints (Italy, France I think) with IS flags (as a joke) and no-one stopped them because the checkpoints had been abandoned long ago.
Not according to the BBC article’s legal correspondent...
Yes and if she got through ok then she could live in Holland with her husband’s family.
Not according to Bangladesh:
I'm no lawyer tbh, nor am I particularly well versed in British, Bangladeshi or international law. I'm just going on (as i imagine most are) the wording of the articles of journalists.
You should really inform yourself about Schengen. Would you say people can just walk into the UK from anywhere because there's no boarder check between England and Scotland? I really don't care what some comedians do as a joke. I live near a boarder, I'm very much dependent on an open boarder, and lies like the one you posted are endangering it. She would be checked when entering Schengen, and at this point, she wouldn't be allowed in.
I know. Bangladesh seems to be arguing against their own “bloodline” law. That’s my point.
I find running off to join a terrorist group to be disgusting myself, truth be told.
You can find more than one thing disgusting. I don’t think anyone here condones what she did, least I hope not!
Ooh, guilt by association might not be a good concept for Americans to cite at the moment.
I went (drove) from UK to France, getting on for 2years ago now, and we never got checked once. Only got checked coming back into the UK so it’s perhaps not as tight as people think.
Have you been a member of ISIS?
Lolz you're so basic man no offense
Sorry, can’t answer that. 5th is my right!
Obviously not a serious question. But I very much think you would have been checked if you were a known member.
