Should artifacts be returned to former colonies?

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,461
Location
Tameside
I built a lot of the storage for the British Museum a few years back, feck me they have way more than you'd ever think.
They did a conference for other museums where they advocated experimenting when developing temporary exhibitions by just setting up a mock-up of it in a different exhibition space. They don't have any idea about the limited resources most other museums have in comparison to theirs, they are a step away from 'let them eat cake'.
 

Edgar Allan Pillow

Ero-Sennin
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
41,490
Location
┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬
No it doesn't depend. These "artifacts" (which in many cases include actual human remains), belong to the people from where they came from. So who decides if the actual home of these art works is "safe" or "stable" enough for them to be returned? Because things never get stolen or destroyed in Western museums? The level of arrogance and snobbery is off the charts here.
Possibly one of UNs councils or something.

Yes, the chances of a artifact being safe is much higher in a museum in London is far higher than a similar museum in Jordan or Syria.
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,790
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
@Colin , how would you feel if you had a lovely chess set that your ancestors built and then Silent Witness came over uninvited, lorded it over you for a couple of hours and left with one of the rooks?
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
Interestingly, there's a new article on the BBC about treasures looted from Africa. I'm not sure about the stuffed man-eating lions, but I can see why the other items are of great value to their countries of origin.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-45406557
all of that stuff should be given back. I believe looting like that these days can result in being court martialled and some time in jail. The government should push to have it returned. Doubt they will though.
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,814
@shamans

some more polling, with slightly differently worded questions. Very strong partisan divide, and some age and gender divides.

 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,367
What's wrong with Jordan? They haven't had any internal warfare I'm aware of
They're a favourite target of whatever jihadi group is flavour of the month, being on such friendly terms with the non Muslim world.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,972
Location
London
I'd say its the responsibility of who has them at the moment to ensure they remain safe, especially in situations where the original country is run by militants who are committed to destroying artifacts.
Those same artifacts survived hundreds to thousands of years on those countries without European saviors stealing them in order to prevent them.
 

Grinner

Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Staff
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
72,287
Location
I love free dirt and rocks!
Supports
Arsenal
I watch Antiques Roadshow here in the US and you often see stuff come up that was clearly looted by American GIs in WW2. Should that stuff be returned?

What's the rules on spoils of war?
 

oneniltothearsenal

Caf's Milton Friedman and Arse Aficionado
Scout
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
11,225
Supports
Brazil, Arsenal,LA Aztecs
I watch Antiques Roadshow here in the US and you often see stuff come up that was clearly looted by American GIs in WW2. Should that stuff be returned?

What's the rules on spoils of war?
Some of it would practical yes? For instance, I have a Nazi officer's knife that my uncle looted in WW2. There would be no way to return that and I doubt Germany would even want it. I don't even display it or anything its sitting in some box in the garage I haven't seen in years.
But if it was for instance a high quality hereditary Japanese wakizashi then I would put in the effort if I inherited that to try to return it to the original family.
 
Last edited:

oneniltothearsenal

Caf's Milton Friedman and Arse Aficionado
Scout
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
11,225
Supports
Brazil, Arsenal,LA Aztecs
Look up the BBC show 'fake or fortune'. Its a really great show.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_or_Fortune?
Thanks for the show. I watched one episode on this sculpture that might have been an original Giacometti but even at the end they couldn't truly determine because of some good forgeries of the process. Interesting story, I'll definitely check out a few more

It's quite tough to fool an expert, I'd even say that it's almost impossible. The problem is, if it's not a Picasso or Matisse, there won't be many experts that specialise on this particular artist, and no one wants to send a painting abroad just to check it's legitimacy (or pay a huge sum for an expert to fly in). Auction houses usually hire authenticity experts beforehand, but there are many cases when they were not ready to spend a huge amount on a real expert and went with a cheaper option.

It's almost impossible to pass chemical and physical tests that not only tell you the age of this painting but also, for example, the specific chemical formula of paint that the artist used at that period, but those tests are ridiculously expensive and they're never done unless there is a huge doubt over a very expensive piece's authenticity. Most of the fakes are easily spotted by a trained eye — it'll either be a random compilation of images from other works or a painting of a lesser-known artist from that same school/period with a little editing.

So it's all is about your resources. You won't find many fakes if you go through the best and the biggest museums that don't have problems with financing and employ the most competent personnel. But, obviously, the risk grows as the institution gets smaller. There is also a risk with international exhibitions — something that Ghent got caught in. They exhibited a private collection of Russian avant-garde artists and there were obviously no experts in Belgium on the matter. So, instead of going to the real experts, they decided to ignore the issue and the questions that were raised about the collection owner's credibility earlier. I suspect that the director was in on this though, and it was a corruption rather than an incompetence.

Most of the fakes go to private collections. Collectors are often more enthusiasts than experts themselves and there are tons of questionable influences around them that can offer you ill advises. Plus they don't often know who is the best expert on the particular artists, so they go to the first one, who may not be familiar with all the details needed for a thorough check. I know a lot of stories when the experts told the owner that their piece is fake and they did nothing about it — because that will only hurt them, so they kept pretending that they have an original piece.
This makes a lot of sense. Great info there. I didn't think about how much technology must help since the 1970s. From the way you describe it I wouldn't be surprised if there were con groups? A really good forger and a couple lesser known "experts" seem like they might be able to get away with selling to some private collections and making a nice little grift on it. I can imagine a good movie plot around it at least
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,270
Location
?
I don’t think there has to be a blanket rule for everything ever removed from its country of origin. But some things should obviously just be given back, and the more clear cut cases shouldn’t be ignored just because of the ones which aren’t, in my opinion.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,073
Location
Moscow
From the way you describe it I wouldn't be surprised if there were con groups? A really good forger and a couple lesser known "experts" seem like they might be able to get away with selling to some private collections. I can imagine a good movie plot around it at least
Yeah, it’s usually how this happens. Usually with the help of an intermediary, who organizes the sell and pays an expert for a fake certificate. It’s obviously very hard to spot that from the outside and to prove a forgery after the deal, as no one (including a new owner) is interested in another expertise and private collections are rarely exposed to the general public.
 

Giggsyking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
8,623
I'd say its the responsibility of who has them at the moment to ensure they remain safe, especially in situations where the original country is run by militants who are committed to destroying artifacts.
You mean stealing them in the first place, just like what the Americans did in Iraq thousands of artifacts were stolen by them and being sold in private auctions.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,376
Location
Centreback
British colonists were bad but I wonder why no one ever mentions the French. They were a thousand times worse. Yes, the British used India for its own benefit but at least it tried to make excuses and at times actually did try to integrate with society (still was pretty bad overall but I mean they built some infrastructure too)

The French on the other hand were absolutely brutal with the African nations they colonized.
Perhaps because this isn't a French forum?
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,376
Location
Centreback
I was being facetious. Of course we wont ask for it, its part of history and we moved on.



I'm now on my 6th country of living/working. I've yet to come across anywhere that tries to be ashamed of its history the way the UK does.
Perhaps they can learn from us then?
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,264
Location
Manchester
Does anyone really own anything? Everything is borrowed from nature anyway.

I started off taking the piss with that but I think I've instantly persuaded myself.
 

simonhch

Horrible boss
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
14,549
Location
Seventh Heaven
Supports
Urban Combat Preparedness
There’s only 5,761 people on Easter Island. Give each of them a free trip to come and see the artifact. They can not only bathe in the glory of their own cultural heritage, but also the thousands of antiquities we’ve stolen from all over the world.

Plus, I bet the fish and chips are way better in London.
 

SquishyMcSquish

New Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Messages
8,198
Supports
Tottenham
I guess it depends on how the artifacts were obtained. If they were straight up looted then I don’t see how we have any right to keep them.

If they were solid or legally ceded in treaties of war/a gift etc then it becomes trickier.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,446
Location
Birmingham
Does anyone really own anything? Everything is borrowed from nature anyway.

I started off taking the piss with that but I think I've instantly persuaded myself.
You are a man of wisdom.
 

SteveJ

all-round nice guy, aka Uncle Joe Kardashian
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
62,851
Yet more wisdom:

If someone stole your pants off the washing line & then 'shared them with the world' in a museum, you'd be pissed off royal an' no mistake, guv.

TL;DR Give the stuff back, twits.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,073
Location
Moscow
I'm not sure you are speaking from personal experience or just suspicion, but if you're a UK museum, for example, you have to abide by the laws of the land as well as a code of practice, which means all of the shady dealings you mention are not going to happen. There's always got to be a paper trail.
Thought about your post when I was reading the news. One of the Russian museums decided to do a big exhibition of the works from their collection, mostly focused on Russian avant-garde. Since it was a big event, they decided to invite experts to check their collection and, unsurprisingly, found quite a few fakes. One of them was Malevich — the original work was in museum's collection since the 20's, but turns out it was replaced by a fake in the 70's and the original is now at New York's MoMA... And, by the way, I'm not accusing MoMA of anything — I'm 99% sure that they've bought the work legitimately, but one of its previous owners organised the whole thing.
 

villain

Hates Beyoncé
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
14,974
On the topic of other colonialists;


France in particular were particular scumbags, and I think they still get colonial tax from former colonies.
It's not just the Brits were who were bad.
 

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,461
Location
Tameside
Thought about your post when I was reading the news. One of the Russian museums decided to do a big exhibition of the works from their collection, mostly focused on Russian avant-garde. Since it was a big event, they decided to invite experts to check their collection and, unsurprisingly, found quite a few fakes. One of them was Malevich — the original work was in museum's collection since the 20's, but turns out it was replaced by a fake in the 70's and the original is now at New York's MoMA... And, by the way, I'm not accusing MoMA of anything — I'm 99% sure that they've bought the work legitimately, but one of its previous owners organised the whole thing.
Yeah, it's not foolproof. There's always the possibility of an inside job, as the sums of money involved are a lot more than most curators will ever earn!
 

Trizy

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
12,009
Isn't the Vatican littered with relics and artifacts?

I was there once but the actual museum part was under construction and closed. Apparently there's billions of stuff in there.
 
Last edited:

Raulduke

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
2,560
Isn't the Vatican littered with relics and artifacts?

I was there once but the actually museum part was under construction and closed. Apparently there's billions of stuff in there.
The obelisk in St Peter's Square is Egyptian as are quite a few of the obelisks around Rome itself.
 

Trizy

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
12,009
Yeah, one of them even conducts mass from his window.
You just reminded me of my visit. I was in the square with thousands of people and there were big screens showing the Pope saying mass. Thought it was cool but was wondering where he was (rumors were he was in Argentina at the time). Took me a while to notice no one looking at the screen but towards a tiny window in an non-important looking building considering the Architecture of the neighboring buildings. He was great live though :lol: