Walters_19_MuFc
Full Member
Wow. People are really desperate, judging by the votes. Having said that, Mourinho's track record doesn't lie. He has been a very successful manager. Still wouldn't want him, though.
I didn't see much of his Porto team but I found his Chelsea, Inter and Real teams mostly soulless machines, effective at scoring yes, but it was not the flair football I want to see from United, there's just something very mechanical about everything he touches, and I hate his trait of trying to see out games with a DM sub at 70 minutes instead of going for the jugular like Pep and Klopps teams do.Well what can I say, I've always been kind of a closet Mourinho admirer (from afar), and even wanted him to replace Fergie in 2013. He can be petulant yes, but a lot of it is physiological warfare (barring this season, the Tito eye gouging and the Eva episode - the details of which are still pretty murky). Do think his reputation for being the baron of shite football is a little undeserved too. His teams have never finished outside of the Top 3 in the league in terms of scoring (and that 3rd position was from his first season back at Chelsea in 2013, apart from that he has always finished in the Top 2). His first Chelsea team played some lovely football at times, as did Porto. Even Internazionale could be exciting - defeating Barcelona 3-1 at San Siro was no mean feat and they were pulsating vs Chelsea at Stamford Bridge with Sneijder running riot. Real Madrid scored 326 league goals under him in 3 seasons. Barcelona scored 320 goals in comparison, and they had Pep at the helm for the first 2 seasons, including the 2011/ 2012 season when Real Madrid established a new Liga record for goals in a season that stands to this day - with 121 in 38 games. One might argue that anyone could get that level of production from a team boasting the talents of Ronaldo, Benzema, Di María and Özil, but Barcelona had an even better attack and Madrid still managed to outscore them. He does deserve some form of credit for that. Even the draw in Madrid vs United was quite open, and only a sensational performance from De Gea kept them at bay.
He is pragmatic first and foremost no doubt about it, but if he has the personnel to play attractive football, he won't necessarily shackle them unless the occasion demands it - big European matches, title deciders, against key rivals and the like. It's just that those kind of bigger matches are more highlighted, so he has gotten the label of a bus parking anti-football expert. Also, he is quite fluid when it comes to formations. Porto played a sort of diamond with Deco as the AM behind two strikers, Chelsea played a 4-3-3 with Lampard as the attacking box to box and Essien as the defensive box to box with Robben and Duff out wide, Internazionale alternated between a 4-2-3-1 and a 4-3-3 with Sneijder tucking in and Milito, Eto'o, Pandev up front. So the hopes for a 4-3-3 wouldn't necessarily die with his appointment. With Madrid, he was almost forced into a 4-2-3-1 because of Özil too. He will play the formation which will get the best out of the available personnel, so nothing is set in stone from that perspective.
Also, a couple quick points:
1. He will be up for it. We know what happened when he was sacked at Chelsea for the first time - his Internazionale tenure was really special, and I think Mourinho will be super motivated to take the United job. Remember when he was at Porto and linked to the Liverpool job before joining Chelsea. He said something to the tune of - United and Liverpool are the two teams he would love to manage in England because of their history. And I think United might bring the best out of him, really do. It might just be a perfect storm situation with a club that needs guidance coupling with a decorated manager who's beleaguered right now, and at the nadir of his career.
2. Chelsea's performances this season were not all on Mourinho. The players had quite visibly given up for some reason, and I suspect there were a lot of background politics going on with multiple people trying to one up each other under Abramovich. Plus, a lot of Chelsea supporters I know said that they had overachieved last season, and were set to regress following a summer where they didn't make substantial improvements in terms of adding quality players to push on. Far too much of the blame is being leveled on Mourinho which I think is a bit unfair.
3. Despite his failings at Chelsea, IMO Mourinho is still a Top 3 manager. He has a fantastic body of work and it's a bit early to downgrade him. Some class Simeone alongside him and Pep, others Ancelotti; but IMO Mourinho has the best resume after (or at par with) Pep. Too many times people rely on emotion which stems from a dislike of José, his personality, or the notion of his dull brand of football; but rationally speaking, he is a winner (6 months doesn't change that), and might just be the best choice, especially now that Pep and Carlo look set to join other clubs. And what went on at Chelsea doesn't really affect that stance, because we know too little to form a concrete opinion.
Mourinho as a short fix until the summer to win the league. Pep in the summer.
That's how I see it. If we can sign him up for the beginning of next season, I'd be willing to risk a stop-gap. Otherwise, it's going to have to be Jose.Well?
If Van Gaal goes that is, which seems likely.
If we go for stop gap, there is huge risk of missing out on top 4 and in summer if Pep chooses City and Mourinho goes to PSG or Real Madrid or somewhere else, we risk not having a big name manager available while missing out on CL next year. Basically, that risk is worth only if Pep commits to us.
If we get Mourinho right away, we at least have a proven winner as manager and though it might stifle youngster development and he will create controversies sometimes, he will keep United among top clubs.
Basically, if Pep is not committing to us for sure AND that too in next summer (no sabbatical), then it is huge risk going for stop gap now.
The problem is, who else is there?Mourinho?
You mean the guy who makes himself more important than the club he manages?
And just shipwrecked Chelseas's season?
64 people want him?
ROFLOL!
Mourinho's not going to accept an interim position. He'd demand at least three years.The problem is, who else is there?
Giggs >> Jose?Mourinho's not going to accept an interim position. He'd demand at least three years.
His style of play is defensive and boring.
Ancelotti would be a better choice. Or hand the reigns over to Giggs. Let him have a shot, with possibly Rene Meulensteen
brought on board.
The guy that won the league last season? The guy that has won the league in 4 different countries. Yeah, wonder why anybody would want him. Lets just give it to Giggs, he once managed a team for 3 games or something. Much better.Mourinho?
You mean the guy who makes himself more important than the club he manages?
And just shipwrecked Chelseas's season?
64 people want him?
ROFLOL!
We are talking about an interim manager.Giggs >> Jose?
You're living in a bubble.
Do you mean not or now?Depends on Pep. We are not heavily dependent on sponsors for revenue, Maureen has a track record of offending people so f*ck knows who he might upset. One thing is clear, LVG must go now.
You're not wrong.The stop gap that would give us the best chance of qualifying for champions leagu is Louis van gaal. Not very exciting but the truth unfortunately...
The guy that has managed 4 wins in the last 15 games?The stop gap that would give us the best chance of qualifying for champions leagu is Louis van gaal. Not very exciting but the truth unfortunately...
You never know. Could happen.Giggs stopgap and Guardiola in the summer (I KNOW, NO CHANCE).
Except that they aren't the same at all. Ironically, they are completely different.The first two options are ironically the same.
I can understand Guardiola, but I don't see why Ancelotti would be superior to Mourinho. He's not one for long term roles either and he can blow hot and cold. He's done well in the Champions League but his league career hasn't been anything special. Other than the fact he's been sitting at home and Mourinho's had his first real crap season, I don't see the advantages (unless it's the character issues that you're worried about).Voted Mourinho, however, if Pep/Carlo were up for it in the summer, I'd actually wait til then with van Gaal (not Giggs) in charge.
No. Mourinho has a record of not staying at a club for more than 3 seasons, being successful for only 2. Pretty stop gap if you ask me.Except that they aren't the same at all. Ironically, they are completely different.
Not if you're living in 2015. If you're stucked in eighties, then yes.No. Mourinho has a record of not staying at a club for more than 3 seasons, being successful for only 2. Pretty stop gap if you ask me.
Whether that's his fault or the clubs board is a different story all together.