BluesJr
Owns the moral low ground
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 9,052
Eddie and Keela are spot on. Jail them ASAP.
It was indeed.Not answering questions could be an instruction by their lawyer or something.
Don't think the dogs were wrong necessarily and Edie was pretty certain about it. But clearly there was lots of people staying in that apartment prior to the McCanns.Eddie and Keela are spot on. Jail them ASAP.
Next step being the difference between murder and accidental death which he literally flits between in the same post. I'm done.@Keefy18
I think you should learn what Occam's razor actually means first, before moving on to the harder steps.
Just read a few posts and to give you an idea of how difficult it is to isolate DNA/fingerprint evidence. I was robbed a while back and I called the police to look over the house. This was a small robbery and nothing serious but I obviously reported it to police and told friends and family. Within a few minutes I had about 6 visitors to my house all wishing to see how I was and they arrived 2 hours before the police did. When the police arrived they took note of the incident and then sent out an officer to dust for prints etc later that day. The result was that about 10 people had visited my private residence in about 4 hours. Needless to say when we got the fingerprint results back they were inconclusive because I we hadnt preserved the scene. Also there were so many unknown finger prints that we could never assess which ones could be the robbers.I'll bow out and bid you all a good day / evening / night wherever you may be.
I've not put anything that ludicrous on here that wasn't already suggested by those close to the case, not sure why the back lash.
Just for the record if I missed certain comments its not intentional just difficult to keep up with all the different comments.
Enjoy folks!
Have you heard the term "You have the right to remain silent"?The doc stated she refused to answer the questions in protest as being labelled "arguida".
If she had nothing to hide and her story was on point she shouldn't of had any concerns other than locating her child.
If someone wrongly accused you of something, wouldn't you loudly state I'm innocent?
I don't practice law but I have often heard the term that silence is an admission of guilt.
Not answering questions could be an instruction by their lawyer or something.
I've no doubt their lawyer advised that.If I was wrongly accused of doing something and my lawyer told me not to answer any more questions about it then I wouldn't answer any more questions. You don't hire lawyers just to ignore their legal advice.
I especially wouldn't answer questions if I had already spent a full day doing so and knew there was zero to gain from answering them once more.
Also, thinking things like "silence is an admission of guilt" is what gets people who don't listen to their lawyers into trouble.
Again, family members / loved ones are invariably guilty in cases of murder / manslaughter and kidnappings.@Keefy18 they refused to answer questions after being made suspects in the case. Being accused of murdering your own daughter after she’s been abducted would probably do that to anybody. Instead of searching for a missing child they’re wasting time and resources on ridiculous leads just like the guy they accused earlier.
The rest is all opinion, nobody knows how they’d react if their child suddenly disappeared into thin air. The stress and panic must be out of this world.
They left the country and rightly so when it was clear they wasn’t looking for Madi, the police were completely incapable of such a case.
Her reaction and not answering question once suspected of a crime is one thing but what you’re insinuating is almost an impossibility in that they killed her.
Feel free to waaay back before I started being absolutely slaughtered by snow flakes on here... I always contested it was manslaughter. It's amazing the amount of times that things are created on here than never exist.Next step being the difference between murder and accidental death which he literally flits between in the same post. I'm done.
Invariably? No they're not.Again, family members / loved ones are invariably guilty in cases of murder / manslaughter and kidnappings.
At this point you are arguing for the sake of arguing.Invariably? No they're not.
There was zero to gain from it because she had already spent a full day answering those same exact questions. There was no new information she was going to give in response to those questions that was going to help find her daughter.Lovely to log into the cafe this morning with a endless list of notifications
I've no doubt their lawyer advised that.
How is there zero to gain from it? She was questioned in the weeks after her disappearance? Should they not of been questioned at all? If my own child went missing I'd be fully complicit with law enforcement and aiding them in their investigation... IF I had nothing to hide.
Again, family members / loved ones are invariably guilty in cases of murder / manslaughter and kidnappings.
Feel free to waaay back before I started being absolutely slaughtered by snow flakes on here... I always contested it was manslaughter. It's amazing the amount of times that things are created on here than never exist.
I'm bored repeating myself but I'll say it again... Accidental death = Manslaughter. They possibly gave her calpol and she took an allergic reaction. It's really, really not that difficult to understand and nor that crazy a theory to think that actually could of happened.
Wait, so Dr Gerry McCann MD didn't know his own 3 yr old daughter was allergic to calpol and/or gave her an over-dose?We aren't dealing with Gerry the Dustbin man, its Dr Gerry McCann MD. I'm sure they'd be aware of DNA considering their line of work.
Again as I've stated it could well of been the first time they gave it to her not knowing.Wait, so Dr Gerry McCann MD didn't know his own 3 yr old daughter was allergic to calpol and/or gave her an over-dose?
Lovely abusive message, how mature of you.@Keefy18 is proper mental.
You said invariably. Unless I'm misunderstanding the word, that's just a wrong statement to make.At this point you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
For someone involved in law, maybe you should do a bit more research. It's common knowledge that a family member / loved one (close friend) will be the perpetrator.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...offences/yearendingmarch2015/chapter2homicide
I'm not an admin, you just come across as a bit of a loon.Again as I've stated it could well of been the first time they gave it to her not knowing.
How could he know if that was the case?
Sorry I forgot, he's all knowing in the world of medicine isn't he.
Lovely abusive message, how mature of you.
Anything of actual intelligent substance to add?
And your an admin? Christ!! Pathetic.
Feck me your a tad pedantic aren't you.You said invariably. Unless I'm misunderstanding the word, that's just a wrong statement to make.
Some good questions here tbf.Why did they repeatedly change their stories? Timeline of events, locations and scenarios. Time and time again this happened under investigation.
Why did Kate refuse to work with the police and refuse to answer questions? A lot folks actually would think that in of itself is an admission of guilt.
Why flee the country once they were considered suspects? Again many would suggest that is an admission of guilt.
Why did she leave her twins in the room her other child had allegedly just been kidnapped from?
If Maddie wasn't drugged, why did the twins never wake up once on that night? Even other posters here have said at least 20 people went to / from the room, wouldn't that wake up 2 kids surely? Before you say no, there's a quote in the documentary that a witness heard Kate scream the apartment complex down practically, that she would never forget it... But still the kids didn't wake? Nothing at all suspect there.
Why specifically announce her disappearance as "They've taken her". Who had taken her and wouldn't the natural reply for a missing child be something along the lines of "they've gone missing"? A family member lost their child before and they sure as hell didn't reply with "they've taken her".
yes that's a good sign that your analysis of the situation is very robustI'm actually dumb founded how the majority of this forum actually believes the parents had sweet fa to do with this. On my own facebook page almost every single one of my mates blame them outright or in the very least suspects them of some wrong doing, But typical of the cafe it has to be different for the sake of a good auld argument.
If you have to make a Maddy joke at least make it funny.Just finished watching this.
If you got to choose between definitively finding out what happened to Madeline or United winning the Champions League. Where would you watch the final?
Based off your username you're clearly an expert when it comes to identifying mediocrity. I'll try to be better.If you have to make a Maddy joke at least make it funny.
Sounds like a fiction novel, but that's the kind of shit wealthy and powerful people can get away with. Reality is crazier (and more sinister) than fiction.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Stumbled across this conspiracy theory. Have no idea how much is true
The fiction yer man is spewing in that twitter thread is much crazier than reality.Sounds like a fiction novel, but that's the kind of shit wealthy and powerful people can get away with. Reality is crazier (and more sinister) than fiction.
What's changed from their original version of events?You do realize that the McCann parents have repeatedly changed their version of events on the night in question?
Only by knowing the truth we can be certain of that.The fiction yer man is spewing in that twitter thread is much crazier than reality.
And it’s sinister too. When conspiracy gonks start persecuting bereaved people. Like the shit-heads who are driving Sandy Hook parents to suicide.
Heard the theory that they were possibly advised by PR people to dismiss it, so as to be seen as nothing to do with it. The documentary as you say is very much in their favour and being 'independent' of their involvement is possibly a bonus for them in terms of combating the conspiracy theories (nobody can claim it's a creation of theirs).I think the family made a massive mistake in not appearing in this documentary. Having watched the whole thing it's pretty obvious to me that they aren't involved in any way and anyone who thinks they are is an idiot, in my opinion of course. That being said, the publicity this brings is good for the case and it's raised awareness that she may still be alive and them appearing would have made that plea to keep looking even more impactful.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jan/23/conspiracy-theories-internet-survivors-truthOnly by knowing the truth we can be certain of that.
Ps. A conspiracy theory is bringing Sandy Hooks parents to suicide?? how?
More than likely this probably has to do with them lying about how many times they went back to check on their kids during the night as they didn't want to look like bad parents than anything more sinister.You do realize that the McCann parents have repeatedly changed their version of events on the night in question?
Have you ever wondered what it would be like to be the subject of one? The attention etc?Only by knowing the truth we can be certain of that.
Ps. A conspiracy theory is bringing Sandy Hooks parents to suicide?? how?
The idea that they hid the body in 2 hours so well that it has not been found for 11 years is a bit crazy, I agree.That they found one of Kates McCann's fingerprints on the inside of a window shutter in a house she was staying in for a week is surely not evidence that she was responsible? She could have opened and closed that shutters 20 times in the days leading up to the disappearance.
It would also have been pretty easy for anyone watching with the intent to kidnap, to enter an unlocked house, remove a sleeping child and escape without being noticed or leaving behind DNA.
It's a far more believable scenario than this remarkable idea that two middle class doctors managed to kill their little girl, hide the body somewhere nearby for 25 days, keep it hidden under the glare of the police and worlds media, then recover the body 25 days later and hide it somewhere else, while on holiday with 7 friends and their other two infant children and then go on to spend the next decade tirelessly campaigning to keep the worlds focus on their missing child. They've lobbied media, governments, police forces and private investigators and consistently refused to let interest in the case die down - you might do that for a few months or a year if you're guilty but you don't do it with this vigour and for this long.
They aren't criminal geniuses getting off on the idea that the world is looking for their kid while they get away with their brilliant and evil scheme.
cnuts, but I wouldn't put those feckers just spewing hate and straight lies (much like nazi revisionists) in the same category with people trying to puzzle the pieces together in search of the truth of unsolved mysteries.
Obviously. I was just curious what was the conspiracy theory...Have you ever wondered what it would be like to be the subject of one? The attention etc?
Internet bullying cause alot of people to commit suicide so image this.
In this documentary the Mccans got plenty of vile hate mail. It is certainly something that could drive someone to suicide.
This is the most hilarious thing I've read on the Caf this year.I'm actually dumb founded how the majority of this forum actually believes the parents had sweet fa to do with this. On my own facebook page almost every single one of my mates blame them outright or in the very least suspects them of some wrong doing, But typical of the cafe it has to be different for the sake of a good auld argument
Facebook pals are always spot on didn’t you know.This is the most hilarious thing I've read on the Caf this year.
And I've spent considerable time in the Brexit thread!
He’s one of ‘those’ guys.What I find bizarre is that keefy is in the McCanns did it camp and MJ inoccent camp. Talking about getting your bearings wrong...
Your mates believe it, it must be true.I'm actually dumb founded how the majority of this forum actually believes the parents had sweet fa to do with this. On my own facebook page almost every single one of my mates blame them outright or in the very least suspects them of some wrong doing, But typical of the cafe it has to be different for the sake of a good auld argument.