The RedCafe Boxing Thread

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,107
The only losses Brook has had have been to legit world class fighters. Khan really can't say the same.

That he doesn't have the résumé he should have is a legit criticism, but it should equally be directed to Hearn for screwing him after the Porter win. I mean who the feck puts their fresh 147 world champion in against the p4p scariest puncher in his era, who is two whole weight classes above him? He was never the same after that. Then, when he stepped up in class v Spence and Crawford, he was always on a hiding to nothing, and there's no shame in that whatsoever.
Indeed, he's fought some unbelievable fighters. Those three are genuine class, all would be within the top 10 in the sport at the time he fought them.

He's had a decent career but could have been better with a bit more luck. Very talented fighter, I think his problem has always been that his Ingle reflex based style tends to fall apart a bit under sustained pressure. It looks great when he's on top but at the very top it's a bit dubious and then he had to do a ton of holding to compensate. I think all Ingles fighters have been like that but he's probably been the most talented since Naz.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
Indeed, he's fought some unbelievable fighters. Those three are genuine class, all would be within the top 10 in the sport at the time he fought them.

He's had a decent career but could have been better with a bit more luck. Very talented fighter, I think his problem has always been that his Ingle reflex based style tends to fall apart a bit under sustained pressure. It looks great when he's on top but at the very top it's a bit dubious and then he had to do a ton of holding to compensate. I think all Ingles fighters have been like that but he's probably been the most talented since Naz.
Yeah fully agreed.
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
20,241
Location
England
The only losses Brook has had have been to legit world class fighters. Khan really can't say the same.

That he doesn't have the résumé he should have is a legit criticism, but it should equally be directed to Hearn for screwing him after the Porter win. I mean who the feck puts their fresh 147 world champion in against the p4p scariest puncher in his era, who is two whole weight classes above him? He was never the same after that. Then, when he stepped up in class v Spence and Crawford, he was always on a hiding to nothing, and there's no shame in that whatsoever.
Yup. Why did he even take that fight? Really halted his career.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
Fight went exactly how I expected it would if they fought 5/6 years ago. Brook is just on another level to Khan in so many ways. He’s a much smarter fighter, a much better finisher, moves around the ring better, picks his shots better, takes a shot better.

I was worried Kell might be shot but make no mistake this is exactly how this fight goes at any point in their careers. Khan is fast……end of. He has nothing else but his speed and to be fair the heart of a lion.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,511
Location
Manchester
Fight went exactly how I expected it would if they fought 5/6 years ago. Brook is just on another level to Khan in so many ways. He’s a much smarter fighter, a much better finisher, moves around the ring better, picks his shots better, takes a shot better.

I was worried Kell might be shot but make no mistake this is exactly how this fight goes at any point in their careers. Khan is fast……end of. He has nothing else but his speed and to be fair the heart of a lion.
Do you really think he moves around the ring better? I don’t. I think Brook has the timing and power (he’s naturally the bigger fighter anyway).
 

M15 Red.

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2015
Messages
800
Brooke demolished Khan tonight. Credit to Amir for surviving so long. No rematch needed.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
Do you really think he moves around the ring better? I don’t. I think Brook has the timing and power (he’s naturally the bigger fighter anyway).
Khan has incredible speed but Brook is just the superior boxer. He has a higher boxing IQ than Khan. Always has.
 

IWat

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
895
Neither does Khan... and this is not a world class win at all.
Yes, he does. Malignaggi won another title after losing to Khan, Judah a 2 div champ, Maidana a 2 div champ who obliterated Broner after losing to Khan, Alexander (granted with issues) a 2 div champ. And that's me being fair and not giving him wins e.g. over Barrera for example due to his age when Khan fought him.
 
Last edited:

IWat

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
895
The only losses Brook has had have been to legit world class fighters. Khan really can't say the same.

That he doesn't have the résumé he should have is a legit criticism, but it should equally be directed to Hearn for screwing him after the Porter win. I mean who the feck puts their fresh 147 world champion in against the p4p scariest puncher in his era, who is two whole weight classes above him? He was never the same after that. Then, when he stepped up in class v Spence and Crawford, he was always on a hiding to nothing, and there's no shame in that whatsoever.
Prescott is really the only non-world class loss Khan has in my opinion. Every other loss is to someone who won belts in at least 2 divisions (Brook excluded).

I completely agree with you on Hearn, it's a real shame.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,580
Yes, he does. Malignaggi won another title after losing to Khan, Judah a 2 div champ, Maidana a 2 div champ who obliterated Broner after losing to Khan, Alexander (granted with issues) a 2 div champ. And that's me being fair and not giving him wins e.g. over Barrera for example due to his age when Khan fought him.
None of that convinces me ... since I knew those otherwise I wouldn't comment. Maidana is as close as it got, but his rep is overly boosted by troubling a coasting Floyd.

I don't consider someone 'world class' just because they have a name. Khan's cherry picked his fights reasonably so people fall for the hype he wants you to fall for. Everyone wins belts nowadays, too many of them and some top tier guys care less about them so drop them for fun.

I wouldn't call Porter overly world class either before that comes in, but at least he wasn't on the slide. And Brook did feck all with that win anyway, three mid to lower tier guys then walks into GGG for like no reason whatsoever - still stunned he even went 11 with Spence after that.
 

IWat

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
895
None of that convinces me ... since I knew those otherwise I wouldn't comment. Maidana is as close as it got, but his rep is overly boosted by troubling a coasting Floyd.

I don't consider someone 'world class' just because they have a name. Khan's cherry picked his fights reasonably so people fall for the hype he wants you to fall for. Everyone wins belts nowadays, too many of them and some top tier guys care less about them so drop them for fun.

I wouldn't call Porter overly world class either before that comes in, but at least he wasn't on the slide. And Brook did feck all with that win anyway, three mid to lower tier guys then walks into GGG for like no reason whatsoever - still stunned he even went 11 with Spence after that.
I get what you're saying about belts, it's why I didn't include Kotelnik, Diaz, Collazo etc who were all former champs and were either poor champs e.g. Kotenlnik or well past their peak at the time. To me though it's much rarer that someone manages to fluke it across multiple weight divisions.

I'd personally say Porter was world class. I don't think you have to be a future hall of famer to have been a world-class fighter. But it's the joy of everyones definitions being different.
 

LDUred

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
1,919
Still to this day one of the greatest fights I've ever seen.
Yeah, stunning fight. That was Amir Khan at his best and also showing all his chinny nature. He was very vulnerable but also very capable of hurting his opponent. It was a fascinating match-up with an equally volatile, mercurial fighter.

Tonight, his legs just weren't there and he wasn't causing Brook any trouble with what he was throwing. He didn't look at the races.

The loss against Peterson was very unfortunate. He clearly won that and it's an L on his record that should not be there.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Khan hasn’t fought in 2.5 years and lost a lot of money in property,, this wasn’t anything more than a money grab..
He had a TV show on BBC. I think him and his wife are likeable but Khan is a bit of a doormat. He built this daft wedding venue for his dad at the cost of millions. His ‘mates’ take the mic out of him too asking for stuff. He can’t say no to anything.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
Prescott is really the only non-world class loss Khan has in my opinion. Every other loss is to someone who won belts in at least 2 divisions (Brook excluded).

I completely agree with you on Hearn, it's a real shame.
Peterson? I wouldn't have him on that level, even Garcia is borderline for me.

Brook's losses were to people who were genuinely in the p4p conversation. While most of Khan's were as well, he also had some absolute stinkers in there as well.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
31,236
Supports
Everton
Yeah definitely, one took the fight because he wanted to fight; the other wanted the purse
i think so. It’s a shame it happened now as you’ll still get people saying if it was x years ago Khan would have won etc.
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,732
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
Brook should retire as well, titanium in the eye and looks terrible against any decent fighter. I fear Sky will try and drum up some support for a Eubanks fight, then he gets really injured again.
It's a good way to call it a day with the win over Khan, but I still think he could beat Eubank. I've been a big fan of Brook and don't want to see him get messed up and lose another after this fight, but a part of me would love to see him take Eubank apart.
 
Last edited:

Glorio

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
4,708
There’s a reason why one never wanted this fight….which we saw last night.
Exactly - he knew he'd get beat, he made it all about levels while obviously ducking a better but less popular fighter, agreed when there were no other options, and got taken apart like he would have while they were at their peaks.

If anything I felt being at this point of their carriers was a bit of a leveller as Brook has taken some serious punishment recently.
 

BBer13

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
438
I think kell brook has had a great career, the win against Khan is the perfect way for him to end it now. With kell brook he is very big at 147, he can make the weight but i still would of liked to see him go up one weight division and try for a title there. He has only lost against P4P fighters, and except for the crawford fight he never looked massively out of place in the ring with any of them. He was stupid to fight a prime GGG but he was boxing well until his eye socket gave way and in the spence fight i had him winning the fight until the headbutt broke his other eye socket. The crawford fight was disappointing to watch, but you can see his preparation for that fight wasn't all there. He came in very drained, didn't have the longest of camps and his trainer in dominic ingle wasn't there which i think made a massive difference. Overall a very good career, just a shame he spent a lot of his prime fighting lesser quality fighters, he deserved a few bigger nights in my opinion given his talent.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
It's a good way to call it a day with the win over Khan, but I still think he could beat Eubank. I've been a big fan of Brook and don't want to see him get messed up and lose another after this fight, but a part of me would love to see him take Eubank apart.
Don’t see it, I’d expect Eubanks to eat him alive, much bigger fighter and a lot more power than he’s used to. Kell doesn’t need to be taking anymore punishment at this time in his career but Sky need a PPV and this looks the only one they got.
 

IWat

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
895
Peterson? I wouldn't have him on that level, even Garcia is borderline for me.

Brook's losses were to people who were genuinely in the p4p conversation. While most of Khan's were as well, he also had some absolute stinkers in there as well.
Peterson is fair, although how that fight was given to him I am not sure. I'd personally say Garcia was though.

I agree that if you look at Brook's losses, it is in his favour over Khan. I just don't think Brook has the body of work really to directly compare to Khan. Khan fought more than double the amount of former/current world champs, I would expect him to have more losses. Khan was facing people like Judah, Garcia etc after the same amount of fights Brook was fighting (and struggling in some cases) against Matthew Hatton, Carson Jones etc.

Either way, I'm glad they seem to have buried it now and their respect after was great to see.
 
Last edited:

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Peterson? I wouldn't have him on that level, even Garcia is borderline for me.

Brook's losses were to people who were genuinely in the p4p conversation. While most of Khan's were as well, he also had some absolute stinkers in there as well.
Yeah but his wins aren’t that impressive? Brook is a man who went from one extreme challenge to middle of the road fights. It’s been a strange career
 

Dirty Schwein

Has a 'Best of Britney Spears' album
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
32,512
Location
Miracle World
Supports
Luton Town
Peterson is fair, although how that fight was given to him I am not sure. I'd personally say Garcia was though.

I agree that if you look at Brook's losses, it is in his favour over Khan. I just don't think Brook has the body of work really to directly compare to Khan. Khan fought more than double the amount of former/current world champs, I would expect him to have more losses. Khan was facing people like Judah, Garcia etc after the same amount of fights Brook was fighting (and struggling in some cases) against Matthew Hatton, Carson Jones etc.

Either way, I'm glad they seem to have buried it now and their respect after was great to see.
This. It's annoying when there's sour grapes (looking at you Wilder).
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
Peterson is fair, although how that fight was given to him I am not sure. I'd personally say Garcia was though.

I agree that if you look at Brook's losses, it is in his favour over Khan. I just don't think Brook has the body of work really to directly compare to Khan. Khan fought more than double the amount of former/current world champs, I would expect him to have more losses. Khan was facing people like Judah, Garcia etc after the same amount of fights Brook was fighting (and struggling in some cases) against Matthew Hatton, Carson Jones etc.

Either way, I'm glad they seem to have buried it now and their respect after was great to see.
Willie Limond and Micheal Gomes dropped Amir Khan. Fighting more doesn’t make it inevitable that Brook would’ve lost more. For me Khan had more opportunities than Brook because of his name. Brook had to build his name and force his way. His performances in his defeats to GGG and Spence were excellent. In any case styles make fights and Brook is all wrong for Khan, too big, powerful, intelligent for him.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
Yeah but his wins aren’t that impressive? Brook is a man who went from one extreme challenge to middle of the road fights. It’s been a strange career
Who did Brook avoid or turn down a fight with?
 

Kazi

Full Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2013
Messages
11,320
Location
SIIIUUUUUU
The issue with Brook's career is that he would always have issues getting high profile fights, as the contenders in the division saw him as a high risk low reward opponent. Ideally, he needed Hearn to really invest in him by overpaying good contenders to get in there with Brook, but that'd never happen.

Khan on the other hand has had a massive profile since he won Silver at the Olympics. It would always be easy for Khan to get good contenders in there with him as they'd be enticed by the profile of the fight, and the money that comes along with it.

I think Brook in his prime is just as good / if not better than Thurman, Porter, Danny Garcia etc. But a bit behind the elite (Crawford, Spence)
 

IWat

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
895
Willie Limond and Micheal Gomes dropped Amir Khan. Fighting more doesn’t make it inevitable that Brook would’ve lost more. For me Khan had more opportunities than Brook because of his name. Brook had to build his name and force his way. His performances in his defeats to GGG and Spence were excellent. In any case styles make fights and Brook is all wrong for Khan, too big, powerful, intelligent for him.
I'm not going to try and defend Khan's punch resistance aha, although he's got a terrible habit of trying to fight fire with fire when he gets rocked instead of going back behind the jab, which he doesn't have the chin to do.

I agree, I think at their peaks it's heavily dependent on the weight class. Welter and above I think Kell wins, below I'd have Khan.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
I'm not going to try and defend Khan's punch resistance aha, although he's got a terrible habit of trying to fight fire with fire when he gets rocked instead of going back behind the jab, which he doesn't have the chin to do.

I agree, I think at their peaks it's heavily dependent on the weight class. Welter and above I think Kell wins, below I'd have Khan.
Fair enough. I’d have beat kell at a lower weight though :lol:
 

IWat

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
895
Fair enough. I’d have beat kell at a lower weight though :lol:
Well yeah, the majority of Khan's best work was at light-welter though. That fundamentally is why I don't think it happened back then, Khan very much picked his fights at welter because it was at the top of his effective weight ceiling. And Brook was unwilling to catch weight it between - Which I am not criticising him for because yeah, he has the same right to be picky when operating outside of his natural division.
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,732
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
Don’t see it, I’d expect Eubanks to eat him alive, much bigger fighter and a lot more power than he’s used to. Kell doesn’t need to be taking anymore punishment at this time in his career but Sky need a PPV and this looks the only one they got.
I know what you mean and I said the same, rather not see him take any more punishment and go out on a high. But I think he absolutely could have (slight chance he still could) beat Eubanks. He's shite. If he'd have fought him instead of GGG that night then I reckon he'd have given him a lesson in boxing.
 

Gentleman Jim

It's absolutely amazing! Perfect even.
Joined
Jun 14, 2015
Messages
3,158
Location
Salford
Supports
city
I know what you mean and I said the same, rather not see him take any more punishment and go out on a high. But I think he absolutely could have (slight chance he still could) beat Eubanks. He's shite. If he'd have fought him instead of GGG that night then I reckon he'd have given him a lesson in boxing.
Eubank is most certainly not shite, he's a much improved fighter who's likely to win a version of a world title before he's done.
Agreed that Brook would have beaten Chris 6 years ago though but now my money's on Eubank.
 

IWat

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
895
I know what you mean and I said the same, rather not see him take any more punishment and go out on a high. But I think he absolutely could have (slight chance he still could) beat Eubanks. He's shite. If he'd have fought him instead of GGG that night then I reckon he'd have given him a lesson in boxing.
The problem I see for Brook with Eubank Jr is that Chris is a natural middleweight and isn't going to come down much if any further considering he's fought at super-middleweight numerous times. Brook is best at 147lbs, regardless of what he himself thinks.
 

Gringo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
3,431
Supports
Portugal
Eubank is most certainly not shite, he's a much improved fighter who's likely to win a version of a world title before he's done.
Agreed that Brook would have beaten Chris 6 years ago though but now my money's on Eubank.
Who does Eubank beat for a word title.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
Yeah but his wins aren’t that impressive? Brook is a man who went from one extreme challenge to middle of the road fights. It’s been a strange career
Yeah, in terms of career I think it's fair to say Khan has had the better one, but I think a lot of that has been down to mismanagement from his promoter(s) rather than it being down to Brook solely. If he had the opportunities Khan had early doors, we'd have seen a much better Kell. As it was, he was kept at the British/European level far too long and stagnated. Then, when he finally won his title, Hearn put him in with a legit killer in GGG. Like, seriously, what were they thinking?
 

Gentleman Jim

It's absolutely amazing! Perfect even.
Joined
Jun 14, 2015
Messages
3,158
Location
Salford
Supports
city
Who does Eubank beat for a word title.
Impossible to say as no idea who he will be matched against or at which weight he will be challenging.
Most likely is that he moves up to Super Middle and picks up a shot at that weight if and when it fragments due to Canelo chasing other straps.