Red the Bear
Something less generic
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2021
- Messages
- 10,281
Yeah, he got busted for it a while ago , clenbuterol I think.Probably. Alvarez is just a bit more blatant.
Said it was due to him eating a stake outside his training camp

Yeah, he got busted for it a while ago , clenbuterol I think.Probably. Alvarez is just a bit more blatant.
https://www.boxing247.com/boxing-news/canelo-alvarez-100-beats-usyk-says-eddie-hearn/220480Wait people were genuinely thinking he had any chance against an average cruiserweight not to mention the heavyweight champion of the world.
To be fair even though Eddie is a proper wanker he just said canelo told him so.
Is callum Smith another overhyped British product? I mean the guy is freakishly tall for that weight (have no idea how he gets it that low) and still seems kinda lackluster to be honest.
Conor BennWho are the other overhyped British products out of interest?
Conor Benn
Conor Benn
Just find the hype they generate to be too much for example haye, eubank jr, carl froch and many others.Who are the other overhyped British products out of interest?
The likes of Fury, Taylor for example didn’t turn out bad. In fact, they reached heights that exceeded their hype but I do get what you’re saying.Just find the hype they generate to be too much for example haye, eubank jr, carl froch and many others.
Some genuinely good boxers but I feel the hype machine goes too far at times.
The likes of Fury, Taylor for example didn’t turn out bad. In fact, they reached heights that exceeded their hype but I do get what you’re saying.
Funnily enough fury wasn't your media darling (Joshua had a lot more media attention thrown his way) maybe due to being more controversial perhaps.The likes of Fury, Taylor for example didn’t turn out bad. In fact, they reached heights that exceeded their hype but I do get what you’re saying.
I think Froch got every ounce of what he put into boxing to the point he perhaps overachieved based on pure ability. That’s because he was very willing to challenge himself apart from being openly scared of GGG. I didn’t think he’d beat Pascal, many felt Abraham was gonna beat him, Bute was strongly favored too and he silenced doubters with the Groves rematch. Not a pound for pound player or an hall of famer, but a fine career nonetheless.I don't think Froch was overhyped. He had a fantastic career all things considered. David Haye perhaps. He had the talent though but his failings were injuries/attitude.
Joshua was carefully constructed inside and outside the ropes. Unfortunately, it appears his finest hour - the Klitschcko win - was the fight which appears to have taken a lot of his fire. He appeared willing to go through hell to win a battle. Now, not so much.Funnily enough fury wasn't your media darling (Joshua had a lot more media attention thrown his way) maybe due to being more controversial perhaps.
Maybe it's just due to us being rather lackluster at the moment so the media attention is shifted to uk because of the lingua franca and all that.
The thing about Joshua is that he really isn't a natural boxer , fury derides him for it (calling him stiff and all that) and honestly I feel there's a degree of truth to it, he just feels off at times like a fish out of water , it was severely visible in the usyk match where he was clearly outclassed.Joshua was carefully constructed inside and outside the ropes. Unfortunately, it appears his finest hour - the Klitschcko win - was the fight which appears to have taken a lot of his fire. He appeared willing to go through hell to win a battle. Now, not so much.
Fury wasn’t given a prayer against Wladimir, the boring nature of the fight didn’t exactly excite people, nor did his meltdown after it, he gained some luster back with the Wilder fights and he’s became more likable too. In fact, his last three fights, he’s been very exciting whereas previously he was a bit boring in the ring.
The thing about Joshua is that he really isn't a natural boxer , fury derides him for it (calling him stiff and all that) and honestly I feel there's a degree of truth to it, he just feels off at times like a fish out of water , it was severely visible in the usyk match where he was clearly outclassed.
I'm not taking credit away for him as he truly is a consummate professional in terms of working hard, the problem is he really isn't excessively blessed in one area to make up for his shortcomings (he doesn't have the best chin, best knockout power or endurance) , to me he's a better version of frank Bruno.
I never understood why fury didn't get they hype he deserved ( i was very impressed by his showing against Wladimir as you could argue he beat the better version of an all time great much more easily than the rusty version that Joshua gone to war with) but he might be on the cusp of achieving that if he goes for the undisputable title match.
I think Usyk beats Joshua again, possibly by late stoppage next time and I give Usyk almost a 50/50 shot with Fury. I think Usyk is the best fighter in the world and he’d present a lot of stylistic problems for Fury.The thing about Joshua is that he really isn't a natural boxer , fury derides him for it (calling him stiff and all that) and honestly I feel there's a degree of truth to it, he just feels off at times like a fish out of water , it was severely visible in the usyk match where he was clearly outclassed.
I'm not taking credit away for him as he truly is a consummate professional in terms of working hard, the problem is he really isn't excessively blessed in one area to make up for his shortcomings (he doesn't have the best chin, best knockout power or endurance) , to me he's a better version of frank Bruno.
I never understood why fury didn't get they hype he deserved ( i was very impressed by his showing against Wladimir as you could argue he beat the better version of an all time great much more easily than the rusty version that Joshua gone to war with) but he might be on the cusp of achieving that if he goes for the undisputable title match.
Anyway I might be made a fool of and Joshua actually proves me wrong but we'll see.
I think Usyk beats Joshua again, possibly by late stoppage next time and I give Usyk almost a 50/50 shot with Fury. I think Usyk is the best fighter in the world and he’d present a lot of stylistic problems for Fury.
I agree.I think Usyk beats Joshua again, possibly by late stoppage next time and I give Usyk almost a 50/50 shot with Fury. I think Usyk is the best fighter in the world and he’d present a lot of stylistic problems for Fury.
I don’t think much phases Usyk. He’ll get focused for sure.i wouldn’t be surprised if Usyk loses the rematch, I can’t see him being fully focused for this one.
Amir Khan has announced his retirement
He’s had a good career, but maybe the highlights of his career are the lowlights - Garcia, Canelo KO, Brook.
Good luck to him. I was never a big fan, I felt he should have made that Brook fight a lot earlier and he seemed to have every excuse in the book not to do it. Claiming he had bigger fish to fry when he blatantly did not, and the next fight would contradict him. To me if you're a British fighter and there's a big domestic clash, why would you not want to do it? If you're not even the best in your own country it isn't good for credibility. I think we possibly found out why but that was a major disappointment.
Fair play to him for getting in the ring with the likes of Canelo, even though it was pure folly - it was also brave. Good wins over Maidana and also Devon Alexander was a good fighter. A lot of ups and downs that's for sure.
But they've both been around a long, long time. I buy that at some stage Brook wasn't the name. There were opportunities when it didn't make sense but also plenty when it did, especially over the last 5-6 years or so.I think earlier in their careers Khan likely would have beaten Brook but it just wasn't going to make him the same money and it was a risk he didn't need to take. To me, honour's even, Brook got his fight and got a terrific win, Khan showed great heart and had a great career. Can't say fairer than that really.
But they've both been around a long, long time. I buy that at some stage Brook wasn't the name. There were opportunities when it didn't make sense but also plenty when it did, especially over the last 5-6 years or so.
Instead they both played it safe and waited until a time when the fight didn't have as much meaning as it should have done. Yes Brook got it eventually but it's always going to be tainted by the idea that it was more a case of who is the least shot rather than greatness. That's the disappointment. You say it yourself, you think Khan would have won at some point, I personally don't but we should have had that answer.
Of course not, but I think we’ve really been spoilt in terms of UK fighters in the last 20 years or so.It's not something I'm going to lie awake wondering about tbh. I really enjoyed watching Khan but he's not an all timer is he? Just one of those things really, they put on a great fight when it eventually happened, Brook won fair and square, I'm happy enough with that.
A bit harsh. The Maidana fight was a classic. A great win against a guy who went on to give Mayweather one of his toughest fights later in his career.
Khan was flawed but great value. You never knew what would happen when he fought. Super fast hands but poor defensively and with a questionable chin.