How much more do you think we're going to get out of these idiots though?
Transfer Tweets - 2019/20 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting
- Thread starter KM
- Start date
- Status
Or we won’t. Time will tell how badly Ole wants to keep the wantaway striker he deemed not in his plans who makes 200k per week.
It's the principle, they played hardball over Perisic, demanding Martial plus cash, time for us to do the same and get the full fee upfront.Who cares how much they pay up front though seriously, people are acting as if it's their money
Not about that. Its about our club not being mugged off.Who cares how much they pay up front though seriously, people are acting as if it's their money
Inter played hardball with us a couple seasons ago for Perisic. We're in the driving seat now.
Who cares.
Does anyone know the severity of his knee problems? It would be a no-brainer if he was fit and fine, but then it would be surprising that Barca would sell..
I think it will be nothing then. Yes Inter are cnuts and if we are happy to keep Lukaku then fair enough. Lets move on with signing players we actually need and not waste valuable time negotiating with the feckers.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He’s got no fecking knees
It's firing up now...I like it
We want £75M and if rumours are to be believed, their first bid was £62M. We should hold out for 75M!
This post is fairly stupid for a few reasons.Who cares how much they pay up front though seriously, people are acting as if it's their money
Yep. Feeling a lot more optimistic.
Inter , we should do all of our dealings early and in the remain of transfer window, go around and troll with these type of offers.
, we should do all of our dealings early and in the remain of transfer window, go around and troll with these type of offers.He’s crap and, rightly, nobody else wants him. Our bargaining position is weak.
I agree. €10m upfront for two years is a laughable offer. Lukaku is only 26, he'll be in his prime once they pay the rest, for an international who will score a lot of goals for them, I'd tell them to feck off. If they want him that bad, then they'll pay the fee and keep Conte happy.
We need to get our players in first like you said, never mind entertaining embarrassing offers like that.
And whay is that? People are being dramatic.This post is fairly stupid for a few reasons.
Ridiculous. No loans. Just pay the fee and it should be 75m GBP not a penny less.
The only issue is that he's injury prone but he's a good defender.
This window will known as "The Summer of Fridge Chutney's Twitter Updates".
edit: since you're scouring the lower leagues, give me some AFC Wimbledon news please
@Fridge chutney
edit: since you're scouring the lower leagues, give me some AFC Wimbledon news please
@Fridge chutneyTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Me!
This is why we're in the mess we're in. We (as in the hierarchy of the club) are awful at negotiating, both buying and selling. Teams think they can take us for a ride and we end up paying or offloading players for silly amounts. About time we play hardball like the other teams.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
We’re the only club in the world who thinks he’s worth it, and we’ve made it clear we don’t even want him. Tough to justify such a silly valuation. We will accept less of course.
Not really. The amount we receive for transfers may impact our ability to spend and arguably agreeing to such a shit up front transfer fee could set a precedent for future transfer offers similar to our past contract negotiations resulting in us struggling to get players we want to keep (herrera, de gea, rashford) to agree new contracts.
Nick Powell. Havent heard from him in a while. I rated him and thought he started well here.
Chelsea must be pretty desperate then. Suddenly our 50m on Fred doesn't look so bad
Our negotiating position isn't great though is it?
It's fairly well known that we want to get rid of the player and the player want's to leave. We also know that Inter are pretty much the only team interested in him (I've not seen anything to suggest otherwise) and they aren't exactly loaded. I really don't think are going to get a much better offer. It's also in our interest to try and get it done sooner rather than later.
Him going would mean we can replace him with a better more suitable option, get his 200k a week wages off the bill and also not waste the summer haggling over a few million when it's clear all parties want the deal done.
He had a great EL final. Was his best game for Chelsea. But yeah, 50m is a lot for an inconsistent player
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I thought Chelsea were banned?
Honestly wouldn't be against selling Lukaku for peanuts to any other Italian side just as a 'feck you' to Inter. They are pathetic.
Absolutely. Even Declan Rice tweeted about this signing (they played together).This window will known as "The Summer of Fridge Chutney's Twitter Updates".
edit: since you're scouring the lower leagues, give me some AFC Wimbledon news please
In other Wimbledon news, today they welcomed back Vaughan Ryan as a first team coach. A good couple of days for Wimbledon!
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Didn’t stop Paul McGrath
I heard that Chelsea was banned from registering players and Kovacic is already registered at Chelsea.
He did? I probably missed that. I though he said he will speak with the club.
And what kind of replacement are we going to buy for that money you mentioned really? We are not buying a better striker than Lukaku that is for sure.
I have no problem in him leaving as long it’s on a serious proposition, not some lazy ass loan offer. They can feck off and do that with the crooks from Torino.
- Status