prateik
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2005
- Messages
- 42,189
There is no way he leaves for free.. Barca might accept he wants to go and accept a reasonable bid.. but cant see him walking out on a free.
If he has a legitimate unilateral release clause there is nothing Barca could do, and shouldn’t have let it be included in the first place.I have no fecking clue of what the Messis are arguing about there. He has a contract at Barcelona and they have right to a compensation as he is a club asset and one cold argue, the best asset. I know he wants to leave but wanting to leave on a free is incredibly wishful thinking.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It's because it's a direct translation from Spanish and from my experience direct translations from Spanish to English especially when the topic of conversation is quite high can make a sentence difficult to understand.Is it just me or do these sentences make little sense?
Messi staying at Barca with a payrise and a handpicked president would be the least surprising news ever" Exclusive preview of http://TyCSports.com : MESSI STAYS IN BARCELONA! BombBombBomb
TO BE CONTINUE..."
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Fabrizio Romano retweeted this.
Seems like a bad translation. I would read it as 'We aren't sure which contract La Liga have analysed in order to come to the conclusion there is a €700m release clause ' applicable in the event that the player decides to urge the unilateral termination of the same '.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yep. Water is wetMessi staying at Barca with a payrise and a handpicked president would be the least surprising news ever
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Will Koeman stay though?Messi staying at Barca with a payrise and a handpicked president would be the least surprising news ever
but it's not!Yep. Water is wet
I've literally just watched a 11min video on this now.but it's not!
In fairness, if you've spent 11 minutes watching a video about that, then you absolutely have the right to reject itI've literally just watched a 11min video on this now.
And as water is in fact not wet, I'm gonna be that arse that rejects that comment every time somebody says it
Go on...I've literally just watched a 11min video on this now.
And as water is in fact not wet, I'm gonna be that arse that rejects that comment every time somebody says it
Well!Go on...
Exactly! You can't unknow it now and you must spread the word.I've literally just watched a 11min video on this now.
And as water is in fact not wet, I'm gonna be that arse that rejects that comment every time somebody says it
Well yeah I googled it and it took me a lot less than 11 minsWell!
Water makes things wet, but it is in fact liquid
Surely that's just posturing. They can't keep the club legend against his will, at 33, costing them what he does. I suspect they are hoping for a mega money offer from City to fix their horrendous finances.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Maybe do some reading then. Yes he has a contract, that's the entire point.I have no fecking clue of what the Messis are arguing about there. He has a contract at Barcelona and they have right to a compensation as he is a club asset and one cold argue, the best asset. I know he wants to leave but wanting to leave on a free is incredibly wishful thinking.
It says end of season ??? Then barca dont have e leg to stand on.Maybe do some reading then. Yes he has a contract, that's the entire point.
The barcelona board have agreed to a stipulation within it which allows termination of the contract if messi wishes to leave at the end of any given season. It's been in his contract for years. It was also in Xavi, Puyol, Iniesta's. It's not wishful thinking. He literally has a clause allowing him to leave on a free at the end of the season if he so wishes. The issue at hand, and what the "Messis are arguing about there" is that Barca are saying that the contract stated he could only leave on a free at the end of the season during a specific date / time period stipulated in the contract. Messi was originally saying that this should not be applicable as a date since the season was extended. They are now saying that actually, no such date even exists - It simply specifies at the end of the season.
I think the discrepancy is that Messi believed it to be 'before start of 20/21 season'. Barca believe it to be 'before end of June 2020'.Should be pretty simple, show the clause in the contract that states there is a situation where he can unilaterally void the contract/leave on a free. If you can't, shut the hell up.
It would after the money goes to them from Chelsea. Real Madrid gave money to Chelsea, who'd have given some to Lille, who'd have then given some to Tubize.Why would Real have to pay Tubize? Would this not fall upon Lille?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Watford midfielder Abdoulaye Doucoure will engage with Everton. The player is already there. 4-year contract. Transfer fee between 22 and 25 million Euros.
The Tweet was spawned off of Moi Llorens' Tweet. I'm wondering if he's just relaying information here or confirming what their sources have also relayed to them. Note: the Di Marzio team has a Spanish correspondent now in Matteo Moretto.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He runs the club, I’m pretty sure he has full control over all the contract renewals. They would slide a paper over and ask what his terms are.Can someone explain to me why Barca gave Messi a contract that lets him leave for free before a certain date at the end of the season if the contract runs for multiple seasons? What do they have to gain from that? At the time of the contract, there was never anything to suggest he would leave anyway and they inserted the €700m release clause. If reports are accurate, he could have left for free before June 30th, 2020, but July 1st, the price is €700m until June 30th, 2021. Rinse and repeat.
What am I missing?
Oy vey. And everyone thinks United is run by a bunch of wankers.He runs the club, I’m pretty sure he has full control over all the contract renewals. They would slide a paper over and ask what his terms are.