I see Twitter reacting in a very confused way... I suppose it depends on the tone of voice with which he said it!
Trump/Russia/SDNY investigation
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) was joined by comedian Ali Woods to look back at the best and worst moments of a rollercoaster season with the annual United Hour Awards.
Has Ten Hag been sacked yet? We're not sure and we hope not, but it's looking more likely as the days pass.
Who should replace him and why is it taking so long to make a decision?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Something is going to drop sooner or later. One thing for sure is there appears to be an awful lot of scared people around at the moment.
Matt Whitaker will not recuse himself from Mueller investigation – reports
Acting attorney general had been under pressure to do so, on the basis of his criticism of Mueller on cable TV and in print
Acting attorney general had been under pressure to do so, on the basis of his criticism of Mueller on cable TV and in print
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...cting-attorney-general-mueller-inquiry-recuse
It's like at the start of all this, they said to each other "Hey how about like Watergate but slower?"
Watergate took several years.
There’s no way this can be real. I don’t belieeeve it.
Is that satire?
There I was thinking she was just some random Trump nutter..... But she's a god damned senior advisor of his. Unbelievable.
Has to be a joke.
incredible
She's just trolling to pick up hits to her website.
She also knows Trump’s disdain for McCain and probably thinks this level of trolling will endear herself to him.
Is that even possible to believe?!
This. She's been irrelevant for a long time, what better way to make yourself a topic of conversation than to say something so obviously stupid/outrageous. It pays her bills.
I don’t understand this. What are they saying/suggesting?
Seems Whitaker is starting to figure out that he himself will wind up with considerable legal exposure if he continues going along with Trump.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I think he must realise that Trump views Whittaker as his White House Michael Cohen. You think he’d be bright as a career prosecutor but he seems oblivious to fact he is not immune to obstruction of justice charges himself.
Much like Trump thought having his own attorney do his dirty work would be protected by ACP, I think he assumes that Whittaker will have some form of immunity from investigation as the leader of said investigation.
Russia supported Jill Stein with a social media blitz to help propel Trump to Oval Office
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/12/bu...al-media-blitz-help-propel-trump-oval-office/
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/12/bu...al-media-blitz-help-propel-trump-oval-office/
Great to see Putin get on board with environmental causes.
McCain died four months ago.
But the article linked in the tweet is dated 2017.
trump under 17 investigations.
https://www.wired.com/story/mueller-investigation-trump-russia-complete-guide/
https://www.wired.com/story/mueller-investigation-trump-russia-complete-guide/
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I doubt all those people voted because of what the Russians did. She got a lot of votes from people who just could not bring themselves to vote for Hillary.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Likely correct. Still Putin gave it his best shot and she gullibly played along by taking on the role of idealistic anti-establishmentarian.
This time round the DNC needs to do a lot more than just give lip service to the Social Democrats. Or disaster awaits.
I saw friends and family members (all GOP supporters) share that stupid Yosemite Sam meme, and called a few out for bullshit.
It's the tweet, not the article that is relevant.
Sure, but everything in the tweet implies that it's happening now, "everyone has just now realized so we've been asking questions, but McCain still refuses to answer". You don't word it like that when referencing something that happened over a year ago. I also doubt most people click the links to articles in tweets tbh, especially when there is what looks like a short summary in the tweet itself.
It's obviously (or hopefully at least) a way to get hits and to get people talking about her like some of the guys above have suggested.
It does seem the tweet has resurfaced in a smear effort as most will see the recent date and think she's asking this of a dead man.
But it's Pierson so feck her.
But it's Pierson so feck her.
Oh snap is that the guy from looming tower?
The tweet hasn’t “resurfaced”. It’s a new tweet which is why it’s rightly being ridiculed.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
So now company A have taken their appeal (against the Mueller subpoena) to the Supreme Court.
Why fight a subpoena this much?
Astonishing that the identity of the company and country haven't leaked yet.
There is a rumour it’s linked to a company indicted my Mueller who have been trying to gain access to key documents using discovery but have been denied up until now. The issue with that being they are peddlers of fake news and would likely pluck bullshit narratives from the documents and use them to sully the investigation.
How about this for a mind feck though:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I've got to believe Papp and his wife are going to become multi millionaires by selling their story to someone in Hollywood.
I think this means we're about as close as we can be to the big show starting.