Who the hell knows? Juventus wanting Hernandez could be rubbish too.This article states that LVG is making a new striker a priority....Really?
Who the hell knows? Juventus wanting Hernandez could be rubbish too.This article states that LVG is making a new striker a priority....Really?
How many strikers do you think will be on the pitch at the same time?I think it has to be. Yes there are other areas to address too but if you look at the goals City got last year and how many Chelsea will add with Costa, we really can't afford to have another season where outside Rooney and RVP everyone else struggles to get 10 goals
You need some sleep.I think it has to be. Yes there are other areas to address too but if you look at the goals City got last year and how many Chelsea will add with Costa, we really can't afford to have another season where outside Rooney and RVP everyone else struggles to get 10 goals
In which case goals from other positions (midfield/wings) would be prioritised.I think it has to be. Yes there are other areas to address too but if you look at the goals City got last year and how many Chelsea will add with Costa, we really can't afford to have another season where outside Rooney and RVP everyone else struggles to get 10 goals
Yep. It's the last thing we need to worry about. There is no way LVG's main priority is another striker.How many strikers do you think will be on the pitch at the same time?
We lacked creativity and a goal threat from other positions. Signing another striker is ridiculous.
We scored our lowest total in a good few years the same time the league record for number of goals scored in a season was broken. I don't see how that's not an issue. Maybe because it isn't a favourite hobby horse of everyone here like the midfield issue it'll get ignored.You need some sleep.
It doesn't work like that. They weren't told "you, don't score this season", you can't simply instruct someone to score. What you look at is a team that who hasn't seen a non-striker score more than six goals for the last two seasons. Expecting goals from other areas is nice it's trickier than telling them to do it.In which case goals from other positions (midfield/wings) would be prioritised.
If buying a striker gets ignored it won't be a bad thing. CM (x2) LB, CB and a winger should all be addressed before a striker is even considered.We scored our lowest total in a good few years the same time the league record for number of goals scored in a season was broken. I don't see how that's not an issue. Maybe because it isn't a favourite hobby horse of everyone here like the midfield issue it'll get ignored.
One season ago we broke the PL record for the highest number of different goalscorers in a single season.It doesn't work like that. They weren't told "you, don't score this season", you can't simply instruct someone to score. What you look at is a team that who hasn't seen a non-striker score more than six goals for the last two seasons. Expecting goals from other areas is nice it's trickier than telling them to do it.
What formation do you think we will play that warrants a new wingerIf buying a striker gets ignored it won't be a bad thing. CM (x2) LB, CB and a winger should all be addressed before a striker is even considered.
The strikers we have was not the reason we didn't score more goals. The way we played was.
Of course not, but you can buy players capable of scoring in those positions, which is obviously what we need, not more strikers.It doesn't work like that. They weren't told "you, don't score this season", you can't simply instruct someone to score. What you look at is a team that who hasn't seen a non-striker score more than six goals for the last two seasons. Expecting goals from other areas is nice it's trickier than telling them to do it.
I think that it's more about quality than quantity. Young and Valencia are not good enough.What formation do you think we will play that warrants a new winger
Yes like a Muller or a SanchezOf course not, but you can buy players capable of scoring in those positions, which is obviously what we need, not more strikers.
Nope! You can't be serious in agreeing that needing a new striker is 'priority'. Not a chance lad!I think it has to be. Yes there are other areas to address too but if you look at the goals City got last year and how many Chelsea will add with Costa, we really can't afford to have another season where outside Rooney and RVP everyone else struggles to get 10 goals
Who said anything about more? I think we should keep four strikers, I'd just evaluate who those four are. I do think you need three top level strikers in the four. Not two plus others who if you're lucky will end up with a tally of a barely prolific midfielder at the end of the seasonOf course not, but you can buy players capable of scoring in those positions, which is obviously what we need, not more strikers.
Except us there is no team who have 3 strickers who can score +20 goals.Who said anything about more? I think we should keep four strikers, I'd just evaluate who those four are. I do think you need three top level strikers in the four. Not two plus others who if you're lucky will end up with a tally of a barely prolific midfielder at the end of the season
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
And 3 tweetsSeriously we need to have some kind of filter here, this is just some knobjockey with 100 followers
We have now arrived to the completely ludicrous already! I didn't think we would until late July or August but it's here now!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Maybe because there are too many strikers and they aren't getting enough game time to score a decent amount?Who said anything about more? I think we should keep four strikers, I'd just evaluate who those four are. I do think you need three top level strikers in the four. Not two plus others who if you're lucky will end up with a tally of a barely prolific midfielder at the end of the season
So upgrading our 3rd choice striker is the priority, over CM? OK, agree to disagree on that.Who said anything about more? I think we should keep four strikers, I'd just evaluate who those four are. I do think you need three top level strikers in the four. Not two plus others who if you're lucky will end up with a tally of a barely prolific midfielder at the end of the season
City have 4Except us there is no team who have 3 strickers who can score +20 goals.
It's not an either or. This isn't Deal or No DealSo upgrading our 3rd choice striker is the priority, over CM? OK, agree to disagree on that.
I'm happy to have Wellbeck as 3rd choice, esp since we're not in Europe if that means we focus on sorting out CM and defenseWho said anything about more? I think we should keep four strikers, I'd just evaluate who those four are. I do think you need three top level strikers in the four. Not two plus others who if you're lucky will end up with a tally of a barely prolific midfielder at the end of the season
They have 3 Negredo, Aguero and Dzeko. Jovetic cant sleep without injure himself. But yeah you're right i forgot about them.City have 4
In all competitions last year they had 4They have 3 Negredo, Aguero and Dzeko. Jovetic cant sleep without injure himself. But yeah you're right i forgot about them.
Are you drunk or just really tired? Go to bed.It's not an either or. This isn't Deal or No Deal
I'm neither drunk nor tired. I just don't see why it's beyond the wit of man to consider that we can make more than one signing. I just suggested maybe we do need to look at signing a striker. Suddenly that meant we can't sign a CM or I'm tired or drunk?Are you drunk or just really tired? Go to bed.
I said you were right what can i do more !!!In all competitions last year they had 4