I wouldn’t, it was marginal at best. Casemiro made a good tackle, Amrabat and Gordon had a clash of legs but nothing clear cut.If that situation with Amrabat and Gordon was on the other end and we weren’t given a penalty, I’d be fuming.
I wouldn’t, it was marginal at best. Casemiro made a good tackle, Amrabat and Gordon had a clash of legs but nothing clear cut.If that situation with Amrabat and Gordon was on the other end and we weren’t given a penalty, I’d be fuming.
Yeah the same for me. The contact wasn’t big but he stepped on his achilles. Stupid foul when Casemiro had it covered. We’re lucky, which is nice for a change.Yeh, was a pen. Didn't think it was in real time, still didn't think it was after a couple replays. But the more I saw it the more it looked a pen.
That was nothing. Small contact. Casemiro took the ball away. Gordon was never going to get chance. For me, no penalty.It wasn't an ordinary collision. He trods on his achilles. It's a foul.
What?!?! Come on, have an unbiased discussion. Did you not see Gordon’s sock and heel? Its a defo penI wouldn’t, it was marginal at best. Casemiro made a good tackle, Amrabat and Gordon had a clash of legs but nothing clear cut.
This is why I can’t take posters seriously on this forum. The bias is staggering. I’m an avid Utd fan, but I’ll call it as it is. That’s a penalty every day of the week, and twice on Sunday.That was nothing. Small contact. Casemiro took the ball away. Gordon was never going to get chance. For me, no penalty.
Yeah. It’s not a collision or clash of legs when the attacking player is running with the ball towards the goal and is about to shoot, and the defending player tackles him from behind without even being close to getting the ball.What?!?! Come on, have an unbiased discussion. Did you not see Gordon’s sock and heel? Its a defo pen
Fair enough, but for me if the contact was enough to rip his sock and cause that redness we saw then it was enough contact to be a foul. Was clumsy from Amrabat, who was panicking.That was nothing. Small contact. Casemiro took the ball away. Gordon was never going to get chance. For me, no penalty.
I wouldn’t, it was marginal at best. Casemiro made a good tackle, Amrabat and Gordon had a clash of legs but nothing clear cut.
You have to be fecking kidding?That was nothing. Small contact. Casemiro took the ball away. Gordon was never going to get chance. For me, no penalty.
It isn’t. For me. There is no bias.This is why I can’t take posters seriously on this forum. The bias is staggering. I’m an avid Utd fan, but I’ll call it as it is. That’s a penalty every day of the week, and twice on Sunday.
He is taking a risk and against some other team or other referee it might have been different. But for me, nothing.Fair enough, but for me if the contact was enough to rip his sock and cause that redness we saw then it was enough contact to be a foul. Was clumsy from Amrabat, who was panicking.
Just a fair conclusion from me.You have to be fecking kidding?
It's not illegal to suggest we might have had a slice of luck, feck me.
That is not how bias worksIt isn’t. For me. There is no bias.
He is taking a risk and against some other team or other referee it might have been different. But for me, nothing.
Just a fair conclusion from me.
You are genuinely talking utter shite didn't he rip his sock too?It isn’t. For me. There is no bias.
He is taking a risk and against some other team or other referee it might have been different. But for me, nothing.
Just a fair conclusion from me.
If it was at the other end, you wouldn’t have got to see 15 replays, from every angle in slow motion. If it was at the other end it would have been brushed off and not discussed by anyone in the broadcast.If that situation with Amrabat and Gordon was on the other end and we weren’t given a penalty, I’d be fuming.
That may well be true, but it doesn’t change the fact for me that it should’ve been given.If it was at the other end, you wouldn’t have got to see 15 replays, from every angle in slow motion. If it was at the other end it would have been brushed off and not discussed by anyone in the broadcast.
I reckon we've had equivalent or more contact not given as penalties at least 10 times this season.If it was at the other end, you wouldn’t have got to see 15 replays, from every angle in slow motion. If it was at the other end it would have been brushed off and not discussed by anyone in the broadcast.
Exactly. Clearly the point is not to scrap VAR but on the contrary to fecking look at the images on the screen. What are these clowns doing.They should also scrap the ref's whistle and the linesman's flag. That will stop them from fecking up!
How do people reason the technology is at fault. They have to improve the use of the technology, not ban the technology, because of human error using it. What are we, the medieval church?
Exactly and they are just pushed aside with no discussion.I reckon we've had equivalent or more contact not given as penalties at least 10 times this season.
I think it was a pen but I dont think the ref had a good enough view to give it.That may well be true, but it doesn’t change the fact for me that it should’ve been given.
They were one of a handful people claiming conspiracy during Liverpool's game (which nothing was riding on for pool) for perfectly good offside calls.That is not how bias works
No it wasn't, that's why VAR was introduced.Life was fine without it
Who's saying that? Clearly the problem is the implementation. Which sounded bad before it was introduced, due to the lack of plan for edge cases and subjective calls. If anything the reality was even worse than many of us feared.They should also scrap the ref's whistle and the linesman's flag. That will stop them from fecking up!
How do people reason the technology is at fault. They have to improve the use of the technology, not ban the technology, because of human error using it. What are we, the medieval church?
Screenshot makes it look like he’s trying to make a tackle, which would be much worse. They’re both running, Amrabat can’t change where he’s planting his foot while running.
Long way to say it's a foul.Screenshot makes it look like he’s trying to make a tackle, which would be much worse. They’re both running, Amrabat can’t change where he’s planting his foot while running.
Subjective calls are always going to be like this.
Nah, was just a tangle of feet. I know the ripped sock and red ankle looked painful but there was zero intent. Correct call.If that situation with Amrabat and Gordon was on the other end and we weren’t given a penalty, I’d be fuming.