SecondFig
Full Member
He'd done well to get back in front of his man, and then ruined it all by lunging inHe didn't have to lunge in and invite the dive.
He'd done well to get back in front of his man, and then ruined it all by lunging inHe didn't have to lunge in and invite the dive.
Not a breakaway though, Agbonlahor stopped and Vidic was between him and the goal, I think the call was fantastic by the ref.last defender....not sure why the red wasn't given.
i don't think that matters though, does it? letter of the law is if you are last defender, you are off. either it was no foul, or pk and red. not inbetween. that is the issue with refereeing and rules in football. too much ambiguity.Not a breakaway though, Agbonlahor stopped and Vidic was between him and the goal, I think the call was fantastic by the ref.
I would like to know any defender in the world that would be able to out pace those 3 when they have the run on themtorres, eto'o...now add agbonlahor.
Dowd bottled it, simple as.last defender....not sure why the red wasn't given.
Agbonlahor was about to shoot. Vidic was last man. Vidic fouled and caused Agbonlahor the chance to score. Stone wall penalty and stone wall red card. It can't be any more redder than that.Not a breakaway though, Agbonlahor stopped and Vidic was between him and the goal, I think the call was fantastic by the ref.
Eh, those are three of the fastest strikers in the world. Name a defender who could match those three for pace?torres, eto'o...now add agbonlahor.
Last defender is a simplistic term, but it has little to do with the laws of the game. It's about preventing a scoring chance and I'd say Vidic's position may have saved him there. If it was a case desperately challenging a player already past you, he'd be off. In a case like this, however, the defender has the right to challenge for the ball. He challenged a player in the box trying to get past him and committed a foul.i don't think that matters though, does it? letter of the law is if you are last defender, you are off. either it was no foul, or pk and red. not inbetween. that is the issue with refereeing and rules in football. too much ambiguity.
I think the thing that saved him was that Dowds a pussy.I think the only thing that saved him from being sent off was
a> it was already a peno
b> G.A was going away from goal, not direct at goal, and Evra was not too far away
Actually, I believe the letter of the law is that you have to deliberately stop a clear goal scoring opportunity.i don't think that matters though, does it? letter of the law is if you are last defender, you are off. either it was no foul, or pk and red. not inbetween. that is the issue with refereeing and rules in football. too much ambiguity.
YepI think the thing that saved him was that Dowds a pussy.
He was the last man, pulled his man's shirt before fouling him with a poor tackle which was no where near the ball.
Exactly. Abonglahor had already lost his "goalscoring opportunity" once he was inside the box. As Vidic said in the interview, what saved his ass was that he was not behind the player when he fouled him. I can understand a yellow but it wasn't a red card. In my motherfecking opinion.Vidic had already successfully fouled him outside the box, pulling his shirt so that he ruined the angle. Inside the box he completed the foul on a player who'd already lost the goalscoring opportunity. Red? Yellow x 2? No red could be construed as Dowd trying not to ruin the game. No card was comedy genius. But frankly, who cares (apart from O'Neill the Villa fans and the press of course)
Apparently not. Disappointing. He can't handle strong, pacy strikers. He's no Rio.He was very good. Great to have him back. Hopefully he's over his woes in the big games now... We'll see against Milan.
Agreed. He ain't the same without a Rio ever since the Torres incident.Apparently not. Disappointing. He can't handle strong, pacy strikers. He's no Rio.
We'll call this the make up for the penalty that should have been in the FA Cup semi last season.Remember this. A referee has played a major part in helping us win a trophy. These things do tend to even themselves out.
Aye. Just making the point that we tend to remember the ones that weren't given and completely forget about the ones that went our way. Which is only natural ofcourse.We'll call this the make up for the penalty that should have been in the FA Cup semi last season.
rio hasn't been that great against pacy guys.Apparently not. Disappointing. He can't handle strong, pacy strikers. He's no Rio.
We should have had a penalty today as well. Arsenal got an even cheaper one yesterday for the same thing, only less obvious.We'll call this the make up for the penalty that should have been in the FA Cup semi last season.
Didn't SAF say this about his performance vs Wigan last year?Praise for vintage Vidic
Sir Alex Ferguson said he would have been “amazed” had the FA taken retrospective action against Nemanja Vidic for a challenge on Johan Elmander during the Reds’ 4-0 win over Bolton Wanderers.
Opposition manager Owen Coyle claimed his striker required four stitches in his head after the Serbian defender caught him with his forearm. The Bolton boss branded the contact "terrible", but Sir Alex says it was merely a good old-fashioned centre-back’s challenge. The FA confirmed on Monday they would not review the incident.
“Vidic came in at half-time with a lump on his head the size of an egg, a swollen jaw and a black eye,” Sir Alex told press in Munich. "What's that story about living in glass houses?
“I would have been totally amazed if Vidic had been charged… it was a clear eye-on-the-ball header from a centre-back. There was no intent whatsoever and no eye towards the opponent. I don’t even know if he knew who was beside him or where he was.
"His sole intention was to attack that ball and head it clear, and he did that.”
Sir Alex went on to lavish praise upon Vidic, labelling his performance at the Reebok Stadium "the best I've seen from a centre-back in years".
"I didn’t see all the other games but I didn’t have to," he said. "The return to our Vidic and Ferdinand partnership means the back four is solid again. Edwin van der Sar’s return has helped, too.
"There was a time earlier in the season when all those players were injured and we were very fragile. You can see the solidity now, you can see the experience of these players… it’s making a massive difference to the performance of the team."
http://www.manutd.com/default.sps?pagegid={F9E570E6-407E-44BC-800F-4A3110258114}&redirectorid=news_story&newsid=6647703
Obviously even better then. Superior.Didn't SAF say this about his performance vs Wigan last year?
Yeh I just found it funny how he said the exact same thing last season.Obviously even better then. Superior.
Yeah, just wait for GazNev to say something different. That happens a lot too.Yeh I just found it funny how he said the exact same thing last season.