Manchester United Kits 2014/15
- Thread starter bosnian_red
- Start date
- Status
God no, gold on red looks like a LFC kit
White for me as well.
What does this mean?
See now I really like it, perhaps make the sponsor white and that's not a bad looking kit.
Gold on red reminds me of my favourite football United played and one of my favourite United kits.
We deserve a sexy kit after this horrific season.
Bottom right: Black with red stripe
Direct copy of Bayerns new kit, but yes, would love
Direct copy of Bayerns new kit, but yes, would love
I love that gold one. I like the stars on it as well.
Ewww that addidas kit, isn't that what Bayern had a couple of seasons back?!
I'd see us play in a bin liner if we could have some decent football.
It looks like a Munster rugby shirt.
Same every year, kit leaks and everyone is disgusted, player's wear kit and everyone is slightly impressed.
Doesnt matter what nike put out, fans will always complain about something. Whether its the fit or the shade of bloody red. Then suddenly, when the season starts and theyve seen the players wear it in pre-season, its not so bad anymore.
It be exactly the same with adidas.
It be exactly the same with adidas.
Major League Soccer??
lol yeah I know what MLS stands for. I'm asking what does looks like an MLS kit mean? MLS kits are the same as any football kit.
Except, to be fair, the table cloth. Almost no-one came round on that one. We just endured it because we won the league wearing it.
This is my favourite from the last 5/6 years.
They look shite....can't stand the Chevy on the front.....would prefer just the emblem but they would never do that.
No, no, no. What's with the 3 stars on the Adidas shirt?
Yes I realise it would be for the European Cups. After the shit we give city about their stars, even though we have earned it.
OK if UEFA allows any club to use the stars. No if a club decides to award them to itself.
I can't get how horrible it looks. That log
Hideously huge sponsor logos polluting the whole kit, terrible colour contrasting, looking very cheaply made.
Isn't the colour red every year?
Yep, people get used to them. Even the tablecloth one started to look decent.
This year's home kit was nice though, even though it didn't bring us any luck.
Am I missing something? I don't see any stars?
Look cheaply made? They are all made by Adidas so don't let all the Adidas lovers here you say that. I have Toronto FC and LA Galaxy shirts too and they are made of the same material as other Adidas shirts worn by European teams.
Secondly you're painting the whole league with the same brush. There are some god awful kits in the PL but that doesn't make them all shite.
Just off the top of my head:
Portland Away shirt - no huge sponsor and colours don't contrast
Houston Dynamo's have no sponsor and their kits are the same as Southampton, Stokes, and a few others but only a different colour. Colorado don't have a sponsor and came up with the unique idea of having the stripes in their jersey being made up of the names of all the season ticket holders. There are a lot of nice kits in the MLS so it was a bizarre criticism to use.
Doesn't mean nothing at all but seen this on Chevrolet's twitter feed
The logo on that top is hopefully what we could have, far less disastrous than having a huge gold cross on our shirt.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The logo on that top is hopefully what we could have, far less disastrous than having a huge gold cross on our shirt.
Wow those second set of kits (red,white,black) really look very nice. Which is why I want Adidas. They make better looking kits.
At Old Trafford, that's Robson and Cole. That is our new kit.
This looks like an Arsenal shirt. Hope that is the logo we get though.
I don't mind the gold one personally, but white would look so much better.
Love that Portland shirt. Wish we would be a bit more adventurous with the colours of our away kits something like that would be nice.Look cheaply made? They are all made by Adidas so don't let all the Adidas lovers here you say that. I have Toronto FC and LA Galaxy shirts too and they are made of the same material as other Adidas shirts worn by European teams.
Secondly you're painting the whole league with the same brush. There are some god awful kits in the PL but that doesn't make them all shite.
Just off the top of my head:
Portland Away shirt - no huge sponsor and colours don't contrast
Houston Dynamo's have no sponsor and their kits are the same as Southampton, Stokes, and a few others but only a different colour. Colorado don't have a sponsor and came up with the unique idea of having the stripes in their jersey being made up of the names of all the season ticket holders. There are a lot of nice kits in the MLS so it was a bizarre criticism to use.
It's a big positive to see that Chevvy logo looking like it does. Gives me some slight hope that they will use that with us.
The Portland shirt is really nice. Can't see it as a United shirt though
It frustrates me that we always go between blue, black and white when it comes to away shirts.
Home shirts are set in stone, but the away side gives you the chance to be adventurous, and different, yet we always stay with certain colours
The Portland shirt is really nice. Can't see it as a United shirt though
It frustrates me that we always go between blue, black and white when it comes to away shirts.
Home shirts are set in stone, but the away side gives you the chance to be adventurous, and different, yet we always stay with certain colours
With a logo like that, the leaked home shirt would actually be a pretty nice one, in my opinion. And I'd be able to tolerate the away shirt. But I thought the leaked United shirt pics were a sure thing?
They all look really nice. Shame we won't ever see them on our players.
That means ALOT because the actual logo of Cheverolt is not the actual logo, but a 'monotone'.
That means the most of the kits here are fake.
This is fake then!!
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The red one above is probably the nicest leak so far imo.
I hope it does mean the tops are fake.
The logo for a start is just really eye catching (I guess that is what they want), but it is so ugly. It works on a car cause it is so small, but that logo has been blown up to 3 or 4 times its size, and it just looks really ugly..
On top of that, the kit itself doesn't look anything special at all. All of the Adidas mock ups look a lot neater, eye catching and just in general a nice top to wear.
I assume with a lot of hate the United tops get in general over the past years, that the board would actually see this, but maybe they don't.
We really do get the raw end of the deal when it comes to kits. Very poor, what look like, last minute kits.
I aint bought a kit in a few years now, purely down to the designs.
The logo for a start is just really eye catching (I guess that is what they want), but it is so ugly. It works on a car cause it is so small, but that logo has been blown up to 3 or 4 times its size, and it just looks really ugly..
On top of that, the kit itself doesn't look anything special at all. All of the Adidas mock ups look a lot neater, eye catching and just in general a nice top to wear.
I assume with a lot of hate the United tops get in general over the past years, that the board would actually see this, but maybe they don't.
We really do get the raw end of the deal when it comes to kits. Very poor, what look like, last minute kits.
I aint bought a kit in a few years now, purely down to the designs.
The Adidas mock up's have the better logo though, imagine the leaner logo on the Nike kit and its a much better design imo. Saying that I just fecking hate Adidas kits, id prefer Puma over them.
Also, clinically implementing a monotone Chevrolet logo is cheaper than using the actual Chevrolet logo because of the huge amount of ink needed.
What do you think of the new Arsenal ones? Not a big fan personally
- Status