Wayne Rooney image 10

Wayne Rooney England flag

2014-15 Performances


View full 2014-15 profile

5.9 Season Average Rating
Appearances
37
Goals
14
Assists
6
Yellow cards
4
Red cards
1
Status
Not open for further replies.

Black Adder

Rarer than an eclipse.
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Messages
3,667
Location
Hrvatska
He wasn't good, by far our worst perfomer, yet he kept on trying, bullying Skrtel and their defence and didn't completely sulk down.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
50,084
Location
W.Yorks
If anything, it's kind of refreshing that we don't need our striker to be having a good game to - a) put in a good team performance and b) score goals... we've been so reliant on our strikers in recent years.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,681
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
If anything, it's kind of refreshing that we don't need our striker to be having a good game to - a) put in a good team performance and b) score goals... we've been so reliant on our strikers in recent years.
We do need them to work as hard as Rooney did yesterday, mind you. Crap and all as he was on the ball he ran the channels and dragged their central defenders out of position. I don't think either of our goals would have happened with RvP or Falcao playing instead of him.
 

bishblaize

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
4,280
I wonder how Rooney is going to fit in next season? Is he good enough to play the lone striker role, even when you consider the other strikers on the market we might try and buy? I mean he's our best striker right now, but he has his limitations in a lone striker role. I certainly dont want to see him back in midfield either, at least not in this 4-1-4-1 style formation we've been playing.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,681
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I wonder how Rooney is going to fit in next season? Is he good enough to play the lone striker role, even when you consider the other strikers on the market we might try and buy? I mean he's our best striker right now, but he has his limitations in a lone striker role. I certainly dont want to see him back in midfield either, at least not in this 4-1-4-1 style formation we've been playing.
Haven't we been playing 433? I think he'd be good all across the front three. He's always tended to drift left when playing up top anyway. Seems to like to attack from that area of the pitch.
 

bishblaize

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
4,280
Haven't we been playing 433? I think he'd be good all across the front three. He's always tended to drift left when playing up top anyway. Seems to like to attack from that area of the pitch.
I wouldnt say so. Like all these things it depends on how it unfolds in real time, and from game to game the formation could end up very different in the end. Our team starts with a flat 4 in the middle though, with Young and Mata out on the wing. Obviously Mata drifted a lot and the formations are a bit academic once the game is in motion. Young was certainly playing as a winger though.



That formation above was how I saw the game.
 

Ballache

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
17,233
Location
Stockholm/Beirut
Supports
Martial
Haven't we been playing 433? I think he'd be good all across the front three. He's always tended to drift left when playing up top anyway. Seems to like to attack from that area of the pitch.
It's 4-3-3 in attack but 4-1-4-1 when we defend. At least that's what LvG said.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,681
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I wouldnt say so. Like all these things it depends on how it unfolds in real time, and from game to game the formation could end up very different in the end. Our team starts with a flat 4 in the middle though, with Young and Mata out on the wing. Obviously Mata drifted a lot and the formations are a bit academic once the game is in motion. Young was certainly playing as a winger though.



That formation above was how I saw the game.
Potatoes, po-tah-toes. I saw Hererra, Fellaini and Carrick playing as central midfielders, with Rooney, Mata and Young ahead of them.

Like you say, though, formations are only fixed on paper. The same adaptability which has seen Mata play Rooney as a CM regularly this season, means he'll get his game next season regardless. Even if we sign a superstar loan striker. As per my previous post, I think he'd be good on the left of a front three.
 

bishblaize

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
4,280
Potatoes, po-tah-toes. I saw Hererra, Fellaini and Carrick playing as central midfielders, with Rooney, Mata and Young ahead of them.

Like you say, though, formations are only fixed on paper. The same adaptability which has seen Mata play Rooney as a CM regularly this season, means he'll get his game next season regardless. Even if we sign a superstar loan striker. As per my previous post, I think he'd be good on the left of a front three.
Hmm, not sure I'd agree. Look at the heatmaps and Young, Herrera, Felllaini and Mata definitely played in a line, with Young and Mata playing quite wide. Obviously Mata was the one that got forward yesterday to good effect. Last week it was Fellaini though.




 

endless_wheelies

feeling dizzy
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
3,224
Should be taken off penalties.
18 out of 26 is shite
TBF Van Persie takes them when he's fit. Asides from Rooney yesterday we had an out of form Falcao and a Mata whose only other penalty I can remember was dumped straight into the goalkeeper's hands in the 2012 Champions League final; no-one else that readily takes them and was also on the pitch springs to mind.
 

Sam

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
31,585
Had a bit of a shocker (as usual) on Merseyside yesterday. Its got to the stage where he should just be dropped for games away at Liverpool/Everton. It was obvious he would miss the penalty.

Hope this doesn't lead to him being pushed back into midfield though.
 

Orton

Ati-virus, keeps missing the n button
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
18,981
Location
bonnie wee Scotland
We do need them to work as hard as Rooney did yesterday, mind you. Crap and all as he was on the ball he ran the channels and dragged their central defenders out of position. I don't think either of our goals would have happened with RvP or Falcao playing instead of him.
Really? Pretty sure Fellaini had a big part to play in occupying their defenders too, and only you would use Rooneys performance yesterday as something to have another dig at our other strikers. Pretty sure those goals wouldn't have happened without mata on the pitch. Do you remember the last Liverpool game when RVP was one of our best players?

Unless of course you think Moreno didn't lose his man for both goals? Don't see what that has to do with Rooney playing personally.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
50,014
Location
London
If anything, it's kind of refreshing that we don't need our striker to be having a good game to - a) put in a good team performance and b) score goals... we've been so reliant on our strikers in recent years.
Yep. Can't remember our midfield scoring as many goals as this year since Ronaldo left. Mata has 8, Herrera and Fellaini have 5 each, Di Maria has scored 4, Bind has 2 and Carrick has 1. 25 goals from central midfielders, quite good return. Usually it was only strikers and wingers scoring goals for us.

Saying that, Rooney was shocking yesterday. There is some black magic spell on him for this game, it always happens.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,681
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Really? Pretty sure Fellaini had a big part to play in occupying their defenders too, and only you would use Rooneys performance yesterday as something to have another dig at our other strikers. Pretty sure those goals wouldn't have happened without mata on the pitch. Do you remember the last Liverpool game when RVP was one of our best players?

Unless of course you think Moreno didn't lose his man for both goals? Don't see what that has to do with Rooney playing personally.
It's not a tricky concept to grasp. What might help would be reading the post you just responded to.

By running the channels and dragging the CBs out of position that creates space for other players to exploit. The space between Moreno and his CB, for example, that Mata ran into when he scored his first goal. Even a crap performance from a striker (and that was a crap performance) can be mitigated by hard work and a willingness to run around a lot. The latter two qualities being notably absent from almost all of RvP's performances in the last 12-18 months.
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,176
It's not a tricky concept to grasp. What might help would be reading the post you just responded to.

By running the channels and dragging the CBs out of position that creates space for other players to exploit. The space between Moreno and his CB, for example, that Mata ran into when he scored his first goal. Even a crap performance from a striker (and that was a crap performance) can be mitigated by hard work and a willingness to run around a lot. The latter two qualities being notably absent from almost all of RvP's performances in the last 12-18 months.
Agreed and this is roughly what I have been saying regarding Rooney's performance yesterday and again I will pose the question - who else would we have played who would have done better [than Rooney]?
 

Orton

Ati-virus, keeps missing the n button
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
18,981
Location
bonnie wee Scotland
It's not a tricky concept to grasp. What might help would be reading the post you just responded to.

By running the channels and dragging the CBs out of position that creates space for other players to exploit. The space between Moreno and his CB, for example, that Mata ran into when he scored his first goal. Even a crap performance from a striker (and that was a crap performance) can be mitigated by hard work and a willingness to run around a lot. The latter two qualities being notably absent from almost all of RvP's performances in the last 12-18 months.
You are just blatantly biased when it comes to describing his performances and If you watched many Liverpool games you would see their centre backs getting pulled out of position more often than not and it's something that was picked up on earlier in the season them leaving huge gaps. Nothing to do with Rooney playing. I like how you conveniently compare his game to RVPs worst performances when the team was disjointed with a crap midfield and past it Falcao up top. Funnily out best 2 games of the season are when we have a proper midfield who can play together. How are you meant to know how van Persie would have played considering he's not had the luxury of playing infront of the proper midfield we had yesterday and last week, without Falcao hindering the team? I'm saying that and I liked Rooneys game against Spurs but come on to say the goals wouldn't have happened if he wasn't playing? Surely you don't believe that.
 

Orton

Ati-virus, keeps missing the n button
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
18,981
Location
bonnie wee Scotland
Agreed and this is roughly what I have been saying regarding Rooney's performance yesterday and again I will pose the question - who else would we have played who would have done better [than Rooney]?
That's not the point. He said the goals wouldn't have happened if Rooney wasn't on the pitch which is just clear biased nonsense.
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,176
That's not the point. He said the goals wouldn't have happened if Rooney wasn't on the pitch which is just clear biased nonsense.
Its impossible to say one way or another. However I dont think it is outlandish to say that with RVP or Falcao up front instead of Rooney, we would not have had nearly as much movement, and our ability to press Liverpool would have been diminished also.
 

Orton

Ati-virus, keeps missing the n button
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
18,981
Location
bonnie wee Scotland
Its impossible to say one way or another. However I dont think it is outlandish to say that with RVP or Falcao up front instead of Rooney, we would not have had nearly as much movement, and our ability to press Liverpool would have been diminished also.
It's just another stick to beat them players with when they didn't have the luxury of playing infront of a balanced team. RVP has showed plenty in the past that he can cause centre backs lots of problems, heck he done it last time he played Liverpool, and the best defence in the league (this season) earlier on when he didn't have Falcao up beside him. Rooney's always rubbish at Anfield, we all accept that by now but lets not pretend he was instrumental in yesterdays win when he clearly wasn't. Liverpool's defence is always there for the taking.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
I wonder how Rooney is going to fit in next season? Is he good enough to play the lone striker role, even when you consider the other strikers on the market we might try and buy? I mean he's our best striker right now, but he has his limitations in a lone striker role. I certainly dont want to see him back in midfield either, at least not in this 4-1-4-1 style formation we've been playing.
That all depends if we do go out and try to buy more strikers. If we keep Hernandez when he comes back, we'll have Rooney, RVP, Wilson, and of course Hernandez too, presuming we don't extend Falcao's spell here. That combination of four, while far from perfect, is fairly decent. I'd argue that central defence, potentially right back, and maybe even central midfield which still has its weaknesses will be seen as greater areas of priority in the transfer market. Unless Rooney's form really goes to shit, I can see him being our main striker up front next season, although obviously a lot can change.
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,176
It's just another stick to beat them players with when they didn't have the luxury of playing infront of a balanced team. RVP has showed plenty in the past that he can cause centre backs lots of problems, heck he done it last time he played Liverpool, and the best defence in the league (this season) earlier on when he didn't have Falcao up beside him. Rooney's always rubbish at Anfield, we all accept that by now but lets not pretend he was instrumental in yesterdays win when he clearly wasn't. Liverpool's defence is always there for the taking.
I have never claimed that Rooney was instrumental, simply that he offered some qualities that our other strikers dont, and that he did contribute to the win despite not getting on the scoresheet and missing a penalty. I think I rated him a 5, my second lowest (lowest was Di Maria) from the team.

Regarding RVP, he is deteriorating due to his age and hasnt performed well since the world cup, really. Some of this may be due to our poor form for the first half of the season, but RVP at this stage of his career is a pure poacher. His movement in and around the opposition box is probably still good (match fitness issues aside), but he doesnt have anything like the same energy or workrate as the likes of Rooney or Fellaini. I like RVP as a player, and he has some of the best technique in the world, but I dont think we can really justify including him in big away games like Anfield.
 

Orton

Ati-virus, keeps missing the n button
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
18,981
Location
bonnie wee Scotland
I have never claimed that Rooney was instrumental, simply that he offered some qualities that our other strikers dont, and that he did contribute to the win despite not getting on the scoresheet and missing a penalty. I think I rated him a 5, my second lowest (lowest was Di Maria) from the team.

Regarding RVP, he is deteriorating due to his age and hasnt performed well since the world cup, really. Some of this may be due to our poor form for the first half of the season, but RVP at this stage of his career is a pure poacher. His movement in and around the opposition box is probably still good (match fitness issues aside), but he doesnt have anything like the same energy or workrate as the likes of Rooney or Fellaini. I like RVP as a player, and he has some of the best technique in the world, but I dont think we can really justify including him in big away games like Anfield.
He possibly is deteriorating, and he isn't able to play week in week out, but I don't see why he should be judged so harshly for the failed partnership with a past it Falcao, with Rooney and Blind sitting in midfield when the team were clearly struggling as a whole. RVP has had some games this season which were fantastic and some where he was invisible, and he's never been the kind of striker to chase down defenders and run about all match. Heck, Rooney's work rate wasn't as good as it usually is yesterday. RVP does guarantee good hold up play though, and not giving the ball away to lead counter attacks for the opposition. He still has something to offer.
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,176
He possibly is deteriorating, and he isn't able to play week in week out, but I don't see why he should be judged so harshly for the failed partnership with a past it Falcao, with Rooney and Blind sitting in midfield when the team were clearly struggling as a whole. RVP has had some games this season which were fantastic and some where he was invisible, and he's never been the kind of striker to chase down defenders and run about all match. Heck, Rooney's work rate wasn't as good as it usually is yesterday. RVP does guarantee good hold up play though, and not giving the ball away to lead counter attacks for the opposition. He still has something to offer.
RVP definitely has something to offer, and I would be happy for us to keep him next season. However I feel my point stands that he is not a player we want to be starting in tough away matches at the moment. Simply put, in games like Anfield we cannot have any passengers - everyone on the team must be able to contribute and work. I think that with Rooney, even when he has a poor game, he still contributes and influences the match. With RVP on the other hand, if he has a bad game we may as well be playing with 10 men. For what its worth, I put Mata into that category as well.
 

The-Natural

Full Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2012
Messages
570
Location
pub know-it-all
He's done well since we've at last moved to a one striker system but yesterday, in our biggest game of the season against our fiercest rivals, his performance was totally unacceptable. It really is inexplicable how suddenly his entire game can go to shit and we ended up winning in spite of him. By all means he deserves to continue in the same role and I have no doubt he will put in a better performance against villa but yesterday was another reminder IMO that Rooney is indeed a player in decline and if united really are as serious about swiftly getting back to the summit of the game as they say they are then I do honestly think that trying for a top quality centre forward e.g. Lewandowski this summer is the right idea. If not then (considering the business we intend to do to strengthen all our other areas that need reinforcing) I think that the striker position could be a weak point for us next season when we move to the 4-3-3.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
37,535
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
This wasn't a good performance as he was quite sloppy on the ball and not so good with his passing. However, he wasn't a total liability up front and still contributed to stretching Liverpool's defence and causing them problems. Quite often, Skrtel had a tough time dealing with Rooney, and him and Sakho were getting attracted to his movement quite often. Two of those moments resulted in the two goals we scored. I'm glad to see that, even if he was not performing well, he was still sharp enough to cause Liverpool's defence problems with his movement and positioning.

Still, though, that doesn't excuse the fact that he didn't have a very good performance. His sloppiness on the ball was quite annoying to see.
 

LR7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
8,885
I watched the game back last night and he was even worse than I remembered. I criticised Di Maria for repeatedly giving the ball away when he came on but Rooney was just as bad in the first half. It's amazing that we managed to play so well in despite him being so poor.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,496
Haven't we been playing 433? I think he'd be good all across the front three. He's always tended to drift left when playing up top anyway. Seems to like to attack from that area of the pitch.
I wouldnt say so. Like all these things it depends on how it unfolds in real time, and from game to game the formation could end up very different in the end. Our team starts with a flat 4 in the middle though, with Young and Mata out on the wing. Obviously Mata drifted a lot and the formations are a bit academic once the game is in motion. Young was certainly playing as a winger though.



That formation above was how I saw the game.

Definite 433. From van Gaal's mouth and also those graphics that show a players average position throughout the game.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,496
Not sure why there's such a big discussion on Rooney's performance. It's Wayne Rooney, he serves up this type of performance every so often and has done since forever.

He'll score against Villa.
 

Rob Bowman

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2004
Messages
3,543
Location
Lost American
Saying that, Rooney was shocking yesterday. There is some black magic spell on him for this game, it always happens.
I posted this elsewhere but think it deserseves a mention in the Rooney thread...

I agree Rooney did not play well yesterday. But watch this video esp around 4:42 mark where we see all the work Rooney put in that goes unnoticed most of the time. But because he was willing to do that work, even when his "A" game was missing, allowed us as a team to impose our will for the first 30 mins...

http://www.lfc.vn/motd1/motd-liverpool-man-utd-s15-w30/2/

*Also if you watch carefully you can clearly see us line up in a 4-1-4-1 defensively,

And yeah I know it is a Pool site, sorry about that ;).
 

Rooney in Paris

Gerrard shirt..Anfield? You'll Never Live it Down
Scout
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
36,147
Location
In an elephant sanctuary
I didnt think he was as bad as a lot of people are making out. Not among our better players on the day, not one of his best or most influential performances, but not the liability some are making out. And he was totally justified taking the penalty, even if he didnt take it well. No need to dwell on this, he's been fantastic in recent games and Im sure will be back to his best against Villa.
Agree. He was actually very efficient off the ball in pressing and closing down the channels, won a few knock downs against Skrtel for layoffs to partners, and as someone pointed out, would have had a goal had Di Maria not completely missed his pass on the break. He wasn't a liability at all when moved into midfield I thought, did what he had to to finish off the game.

I agree his passing was off though, and the performance was below par compared to the rejuvenated stuff we've seen recently, but then again that happens at Goodison and Anfield, whatever his form of the moment is.
I wouldnt say so. Like all these things it depends on how it unfolds in real time, and from game to game the formation could end up very different in the end. Our team starts with a flat 4 in the middle though, with Young and Mata out on the wing. Obviously Mata drifted a lot and the formations are a bit academic once the game is in motion. Young was certainly playing as a winger though.



That formation above was how I saw the game.
It's 4-3-3 in attack but 4-1-4-1 when we defend. At least that's what LvG said.
Yep, had no idea LvG confirmed it, but that's what I thought as well, the shape is different when we're defending and when we're on the ball.
Not sure why there's such a big discussion on Rooney's performance. It's Wayne Rooney, he serves up this type of performance every so often and has done since forever.

He'll score against Villa.
Actually, loads of players, including top players, have bad games.
 

Bobcat

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
6,392
Location
Behind the curtains, leering at the neighbors
Not sure why there's such a big discussion on Rooney's performance. It's Wayne Rooney, he serves up this type of performance every so often and has done since forever.

He'll score against Villa.
Yeah, but considering his history, being an Evertonian, and then a United player, it's quite amazing how consistently poor hes been against Liverpool. Even more so, when you consider he was on fire against Spurs just a week ago. It's quite clear he hates them, and considering his mentality in big games, it's weird he never shows up against them.
 

Roman Bellic

Prick
Joined
Jul 21, 2014
Messages
7,145
Yeah, but considering his history, being an Evertonian, and then a United player, it's quite amazing how consistently poor hes been against Liverpool. Even more so, when you consider he was on fire against Spurs just a week ago. It's quite clear he hates them, and considering his mentality in big games, it's weird he never shows up against them.
Perhaps he tries too hard?
 

LeChuck

CE Specialist
This is the kind of shit this thread attracts. As shit a post as Rooney's performance today.
lol-grow up.

It was selfish. It's selfish to want to take a penalty if your record isn't good and you deny a teammate a hatrick away at your biggest rivals. Selfish. Please understand this. If it was Phil Jones on a hatrick, then I can understand Rooney taking it. If there was 20+ min to play, then I can maybe understand this as well.

The fact is, it was deep into injury time, Rooney had a shocker so far, Mata was having a good game, and he's technically proficient, and he's on a hat trick away to our biggest rivals. Even Rooney admitted after the game he should have given it to Mata...so the striker himself admitted he was selfish.

But thanks for your contribution.

An accomplished pen taker? He has scored 4 in game penalties in his career compared to Rooney's 24. What are you basing this accomplished penalty taking skill on? Hes hardly ever taken any.
It's widely known that AVB wanted Mata to be Chelsea's primary penalty taker. In fact, there's an article about it. I even remember there being a discussion about it on the pitch between Lampard, Droggers and Mata (against I think Man City). I doubt AvB would choose an incompetent penalty taker for Chelsea, especially considering the amount of penalties they get.

Mata was also the 2nd in line penalty taker at Valencia (after David Villa), so again, I doubt he'd be given that position if he was crap at penalties.

Mata is a gentleman-I remember in a League Cup game for Chelsea, he offered the penalty to Torres as he was on a barren run (which he turned down), so it's not much surprise that he didn't complain much when Rooney took the ball.

We never do tha, I remember Ruud wanting to give a penalty to Forlan who hadn't scored in a while and Fergie didn't allow it. Same happened once when Tevez was on a hattrick and Ronaldo still took.the penalty as he's our designated penalty taker. I don't blame Rooney for this, there's no room for sentiment in football, he missed shit happens.
I agree to an extent, but I stand by what I said, as does Rooney.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.